ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To provide clinical practice guidelines about fertility preservation (FP) for women with benign gynecologic disease (BGD) developed by a modified Delphi consensus process for oocyte vitrification in women with benign gynecologic disease. METHODS: A steering committee composed of 14 healthcare professionals and a patient representative with lived experience of endometriosis identified 42 potential practices related to FP for BGD. Then 114 key stakeholders including various healthcare professionals (n=108) and patient representatives (n=6) were asked to participate in a modified Delphi process via two online survey rounds from February to September 2020 and a final meeting. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, this final meeting to reach consensus was held as a videoconference in November 2020. RESULTS: Survey response of stakeholders was 75 % (86/114) for round 1 and 87 % (75/86) for round 2. Consensus was reached for the recommendations for 28 items, that have been distributed into five general categories: (i) Information to provide to women of reproductive age with a BGD, (ii) Technical aspects of FP for BGD, (iii) Indications for FP in endometriosis, (iv) Indications for FP for non-endometriosis BGD, (v) Indications for FP after a fortuitous diagnosis of an idiopathic diminished ovarian reserve. CONCLUSION: These guidelines provide some practice advice to help health professionals better inform women about the possibilities of cryopreserving their oocytes prior to the management of a BGD that may affect their ovarian reserve and fertility. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The CNGOF (Collège National des Gynécologues Obstétriciens Français) funded the implementation of the Delphi process.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Endometriosis , Consensus , Delphi Technique , Endometriosis/complications , Endometriosis/therapy , Female , Humans , Oocytes/physiology , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , VitrificationABSTRACT
The management of endometriosis related infertility requires a global approach. In this context, the prescription of an anti-gonadotropic hormonal treatment does not increase the rate of non-ART (assisted reproductive technologies) pregnancies and it is not recommended. In case of endometriosis related infertility, the results of IVF management in terms of pregnancy and birth rates are not negatively affected by the existence of endometriosis. Controlled ovarian stimulation during IVF does not increase the risk of endometriosis associated symptoms worsening, nor accelerate the intrinsic progression of endometriosis and does not increase the rate of recurrence. However, in the context of IVF management for women with endometriosis, pre-treatment with GnRH agonist or with oestrogen/progestin contraception improve IVF outcomes. There is currently no evidence of a positive or negative effect of endometriosis surgery on IVF outcomes. Information on the possibilities of preserving fertility should be considered, especially before surgery.
Subject(s)
Endometriosis/complications , Infertility, Female/therapy , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Female , Humans , Infertility, Female/etiologyABSTRACT
Could the presence of an endometrioma change the management of Assisted Reproductive Technology? The presence of an endometrioma (<6cm) at the time of stimulation or an endometrioma operated prior to stimulation have no impact on the quality of the embryos and the final results of IVF about the pregnancy and live birth rates despite a possible decrease in the number of oocytes retrieved and potentially higher doses of gonadotropins used. The discovery of an endometrioma during IVF stimulation should not lead to an interruption of the attempt. Their surgical treatment before IVF is not recommended just to improve fertility. It is discussed in case of painful symptomatology, depending on the size and/or in case of diagnosis doubt. The associated indications for ART management and surgical history for endometrioma should also be taken into account. There is no benefit of prophylactic surgery to decrease the risk of tubo-ovarian abscess post ovarian retrieval. It is not recommended to make a systematic trans-vaginal ultrasound guided aspiration with or without sclerotherapy of endometriomas before IVF in order to increase pregnancy rates, but it is reserved in case of endometrioma that may hinder the oocyte retrieval. Ethanol sclerotherapy decreases the recurrence rate of endometriomas without altering the results of IVF while a second surgery would have a deleterious effect.
Subject(s)
Endometriosis/therapy , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Female , Humans , SclerotherapyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility and functional urinary and digestive results of nerve sparing techniques in endometriosis surgery. METHODS: A research on the medline/pubmed database using specific keywords (nerve sparing, endometriosis, pelvic nerves) identified 7 publications among about 50 whose purpose was to describe the feasibility, the techniques and the functional results of nerve preservation in this indication. Among them there are: 2 uncontrolled retrospective studies, 3 prospective non-randomized studies, a meta-analysis and a review of the literature. RESULTS: Nerve preservation requires a perfect knowledge of the anatomy of the pelvic autonomic system. The laparoscopic approach is preferred by the different authors due to its anatomical advantage. The feasibility of this technique seems to be demonstrated despite certain limitations in the different studies and depending of the retroperitoneal extension of the lesions. When feasible, it is likely to significantly improve postoperative urinary function (urinary retention) compared to a conventional technique. It is observed no difference regarding digestive function. CONCLUSIONS: Nerve sparing in this indication is a technique the feasibility of which has been demonstrated and is subject to the topography and extent of the disease. In the absence of invasion or entrapment of pelvic autonomic nerves by endometriosis, this technique improves postoperative voiding function (NP3). During pelvic surgery for endometriosis, it is recommended to identify and preserve autonomic pelvic nerves whenever possible (GradeC).
Subject(s)
Endometriosis/surgery , Peripheral Nerve Injuries/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Hypogastric Plexus , Laparoscopy , Organ Sparing Treatments , Pelvis/innervation , Urination Disorders/prevention & controlABSTRACT
Deeply infiltrating endometriosis is a severe form of the disease, defined by endometriotic tissue peritoneal infiltration. The disease may involve the rectovaginal septum, uterosacral ligaments, digestive tract or bladder. Deeply infiltrating endometriosis is responsible for disabling pain and infertility. The purpose of these recommendations is to answer the following question: in case of deeply infiltrating endometriosis associated infertility, what is the best therapeutic strategy? First-line surgery and then in vitro fertilization (IVF) in case of persistent infertility or first-line IVF, without surgery? After exhaustive literature analysis, we suggest the following recommendations: studies focusing on spontaneous fertility of infertile patients with deeply infiltrating endometriosis found spontaneous pregnancy rates about 10%. Treatment should be considered in infertile women with deeply infiltrating endometriosis when they wish to conceive. First-line IVF is a good option in case of no operated deeply infiltrating endometriosis associated infertility. Pregnancy rates (spontaneous and following assisted reproductive techniques) after surgery (deep lesions without colorectal involvement) varie from 40 to 85%. After colorectal endometriosis resection, pregnancy rates vary from 47 to 59%. The studies comparing the pregnancy rates after IVF, whether or not preceded by surgery, are contradictory and do not allow, to date, to conclude on the interest of any surgical management of deep lesions before IVF. In case of alteration of ovarian reserve parameters (age, AMH, antral follicle count), there is no argument to recommend first-line surgery or IVF. The study of the literature does not identify any prognostic factors, allowing to chose between surgical management or IVF. The use of IVF in the indication "deep infiltrating endometriosis" allows satisfactory pregnancy rates without significant risk, regarding disease progression or oocyte retrieval procedure morbidity.
Subject(s)
Colonic Diseases/etiology , Endometriosis/complications , Infertility, Female/etiology , Infertility, Female/therapy , Rectal Diseases/etiology , Colonic Diseases/surgery , Endometriosis/surgery , Female , Humans , Ovarian Reserve , Rectal Diseases/surgery , Reproductive Techniques, AssistedABSTRACT
Should the presence of endometriosis change the management of assisted reproductive technology? There is no difference in pregnancy rate after IVF between an agonist or antagonist protocol in patients with endometriosis, so the choice between one or the other of these protocols is free. But the review of the literature has shown an improvement in the chances of pregnancy in case of prolonged ovulation suppression before stimulation for IVF with a GnRH agonist analogue or with oral contraception, especially in cases of severe endometriosis. Endometriosis, regardless of the stage and type of lesions, would have no effect on the IVF results in terms of pregnancy rate and live birth rate, but with a lower number of oocytes collected, especially in cases of severe endometriosis. In a context of superficial endometriosis without pain and of infertility, surgical treatment of superficial endometriosis is not recommended just to increase the chances of pregnancy in IVF. Surgery may have a place in case of failure of IVF to improve the results of the ART. In case of recurrence of endometriosis, surgery is not better than IVF, a medico-surgical concertation is recommended. In addition, studies on ovulation stimulation for IVF do not show any aggravation of the symptoms associated with endometriosis lesions, or an acceleration of its progression, or an increase in the rate of recurrence of the disease.
Subject(s)
Endometriosis/therapy , Infertility, Female/therapy , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Endometriosis/complications , Female , Fertility Agents, Female/therapeutic use , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/agonists , Humans , Infertility, Female/etiologyABSTRACT
THE PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To study preoperative thresholds of the SF-36 components above which we can predict a high risk of failure in order to improve the quality of life after surgery for patients with minimal endometriosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Design: prospective and multicenter observational study between February 2004 and 2011. PATIENTS: 167 patients with operated minimal endometriosis. SETTING: for the Physical Component Summary (PCS) or the Mental Component Summary (MCS) subscales of the SF-36 questionnaire, an improvement defined by an increase of 5 points. INTERVENTION: evaluation by the SF-36 questionnaire the week before and one year after surgery. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Success of surgery measured by an improvement in both components. We found significantly different initial variables between patients with improvement and those without: initial MCS score (P=0.0003), initial PCS score (P<0.0001) and dyspareunia (P=0.004). Multivariate analysis revealed only two significant variables. Initial MCS higher than 40 (OR=4.6) and initial PCS higher than 50 (OR=10.6) are risk factors for failure of improvement after surgery. CONCLUSION: Surgery is seldom a good treatment for improving QOL in minimal endometriosis. We set two thresholds for SF-36, 50 for PCS and 40 for MCS: above there is a very high risk of failure (86% of failure in our population). Under, the risk of failure remains high (54.3%). CANADIAN TASK FORCE CLASSIFICATION OF STUDY DESIGN: Evidence obtained from well-designed cohort or case-control studies, preferably from more than one center or research group.
Subject(s)
Endometriosis/surgery , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Laparoscopy/methods , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires , Uterine Diseases/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Endometriosis/diagnosis , Endometriosis/rehabilitation , Female , France , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/rehabilitation , Humans , Laparoscopy/rehabilitation , Middle Aged , Preoperative Period , Prognosis , Treatment Outcome , Uterine Diseases/diagnosis , Uterine Diseases/rehabilitation , Young AdultSubject(s)
Endometriosis , Patient Education as Topic , Endometriosis/psychology , Endometriosis/therapy , Fear , Female , Humans , Infertility, FemaleABSTRACT
Endometriosis is a common condition in women, whose main repercussions are painful symptoms. In addition, it was shown that endometriosis was a major cause of infertility and various obstetric complications could be related to this pathology. Uterine rupture is a rare but serious complication whose incidence tends to decrease with the screening of women at risk, however, its fetal, maternal morbidity and mortality causes remains important. We were confronted with a case of posterior uterine rupture in a patient of 36 years, primipare term exceeded in immediate postpartum period. The patient's primary antecedent of uterine surgery torus was responsible for infertility endometriosis. The outcome was favorable for the mother, after a surgical treatment by laparotomy, and for the child. In the literature, two cases have been reported of uterine rupture after endometriosis surgery, which is why we found it interesting to report this rare case. Given the increase in surgical management of this disease, it seems relevant to ask whether, in the future, we should be more vigilant in monitoring pregnancy for these women.
Subject(s)
Endometriosis/surgery , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Rectal Diseases/surgery , Uterine Rupture/etiology , Vaginal Diseases/surgery , Adult , Female , Humans , PregnancySubject(s)
Fertility Preservation/ethics , Cryopreservation , Female , Humans , Male , Oocytes , Semen Preservation , Terminally IllABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare peripartum management of anticoagulated patients concerning locoregional analgesia, post-partum hemorrhage and thrombotic events according to planified interruption or not of antithrombotic therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a single tertiary care center retrospective study of all deliveries associated with antithrombotic therapy from January 2005 to September 2011. RESULTS: We identified 120 cases with prophylactic (71%) or curative (29%) anticoagulation. Two thrombotic events occurred. In case of curative therapy, the use of locoregional analgesia was lower (P<0.0001) and post-partum hemorrhage occurred more frequently (P=0.07) compared to prophylactic therapy. According to planified interruption or not of antithrombotic therapy, we observed a more prolonged duration of therapeutic interruption before delivery (55.6h±63.3 vs 26.4 h±11.6, P<0.0001), higher use of locoregional analgesia (83% vs 71%, P=0.02) but no difference concerning cesarean rate (35% vs 39%, P=0.8) or post-partum hemorrhage (13% vs 14%, P=0.9). CONCLUSION: In case of curative anticoagulation, plannified interruption favours the use of perimedullar analgesia after 24hour delay. In case of preventive anticoagulation, plannified interruption appears unnecessary as the 12hour delay is easier to reach.
Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Peripartum Period , Adult , Analgesia/statistics & numerical data , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Postpartum Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Care CentersABSTRACT
The fertility preservation when it is threatened is a right enshrined in the french law on bioethics. It is most often performed before gonadotoxic treatments for cancers with a long survival. When the patient has a limited life expectancy, is the preservation of fertility lawful? The authors present the arguments for and against the preservation of fertility in this particular situation and give driving they adopt in their team.
Subject(s)
Fertility Preservation/ethics , Fertility Preservation/legislation & jurisprudence , Death , France , Humans , Life ExpectancyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation (OTC) is a very promising approach of fertility preservation for women and young patients who have to follow gonadotoxic treatments (chemotherapy, radiotherapy ). The aim of this study was to analyse the indications and the outcomes of the patients who had OTC in our center during the last 17 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study is retrospective. Forty-six patients, who underwent OTC in the Laboratory of Reproductive Biology of the University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, between January 1997 and December 2009, were included. RESULTS: The average age on the day of ovarian tissue harvesting was 19.5 years. Fifty-two percent of the patients were minor. In order of decreasing frequency, the diseases for which OTC has been proposed were hematologic, ovarian tumors, sarcoma ou PNET and breast neoplasia. In 93.5 %, the harvesting of ovarian cortex was performed by laparoscopy. After OTC, 82.6 % of the patients were treated by chemotherapy. A bone marrow transplant was performed for 48 % of the study patients. At the time of data collection, 57 % of the patients who had evaluation of their ovarian function presented premature ovarian failure. Eight patients had one or more pregnancies after treatment. It was a natural pregnancy for five of them. The three others were obtained by medically assisted procreation (in vitro fertilization and oocyte donation). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: We report a long-term follow-up of patients treated in our center for OTC. The originality of our study is to evaluate all aspects of OTC from the decision to propose the patients an OTC to their outcomes several years after the ovarian tissue harvesting. It is therefore a multidisciplinary approach both oncology, gynecological and pediatric whereas OTC is often considered restrictively in the literature. Finally, it seems to be essential to establish a specific medical care for these patients. This monitoring will allow an adequate assessment of pubertal development and ovarian function, management of estrogen deficiency and secondary infertility, supporting patients in their desire for motherhood.
Subject(s)
Cryopreservation , Fertility Preservation/methods , Neoplasms/therapy , Ovary , Adolescent , Adult , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Primary Ovarian Insufficiency/chemically induced , Primary Ovarian Insufficiency/etiology , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Tissue and Organ Harvesting , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: While association between endometriosis and infertility is well established, there are few studies about the impact of endometriosis on adverse pregnancy outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of endometriosis on obstetric outcomes and whether the severity of the disease had an influence on these. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study to investigate the obstetric outcomes of a population of 1204 subfertile women, including 258 with endometriosis, who obtained, thanks to assisted reproduction technology, a singleton pregnancy evolving beyond embryonic stage. Two analyzes were performed. The first compared women with endometriosis to women with other causes of infertility. The second observed adverse pregnancy outcomes according to AFS-R stages of endometriosis. RESULTS: The overall rate of live birth children was 95.8%. In case of endometriosis, there was a significant increase of the incidence of preterm delivery, especially before 32 weeks amenorrhea (6.2% vs 3.1% in the group "without endometriosis", P = 0.03), antenatal bleeding (5.3% vs 2.2%, P = 0.01) and placenta previa (4.9% vs 0.9%, P < 0.0001). The incidence of gestational diabetes was significantly decreased (0.4% vs 2.7%, P = 0.04). There was no correlation between endometriosis and cesarean section or preeclampsia, or between the AFS-R stage and adverse pregnancy outcomes. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Endometriosis is a factor of obstetrical risk, independently of the infertility it causes. The AFS-R score does not seem to be representative of obstetric outcomes beyond first trimester of pregnancy for women with endometriosis.
Subject(s)
Endometriosis/complications , Pregnancy Complications , Pregnancy Outcome , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Adult , Endometriosis/pathology , Female , Humans , Infertility, Female/etiology , Infertility, Female/therapy , Pregnancy , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Identify parasitic myomas following uterine laparoscopic morcellation and describe the circumstances of diagnosis, management, potential consequences and possible preventive measures. METHODS: Retrospective study of observed cases in a university hospital between 2000 and 2012 and review of the literature. RESULTS: Five cases were identified in our department. Pelvic pain was the main symptom in three patients while one was asymptomatic and one consulted for a cystocele. The average time to diagnosis was 88 months (3-192). Surgical removal was performed in four cases by laparoscopy and vaginally for one case. Histological examination showed typical leiomyomas, but in one case, an atypical leiomyoma with limited experience for a typical primary lesion. In the literature, there are about 50 cases. One required a bowel resection and for another one, after subtotal hysterectomy, histological examination showed complex atypical endometrial hyperplasia for normal endometrium initially. CONCLUSIONS: This study should draw the attention of laparoscopic surgeon. It emphasizes, beyond a potential reoperation, a risk of atypical histological secondary processing. Surgical resection should be discussed even in case of asymptomatic lesions.
Subject(s)
Iatrogenic Disease , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Laparoscopy/methods , Leiomyoma/surgery , Myoma/pathology , Uterine Neoplasms/surgery , Adult , Endometrial Hyperplasia/pathology , Endometrial Hyperplasia/surgery , Female , Humans , Hysterectomy , Leiomyoma/pathology , MEDLINE , Middle Aged , Myoma/surgery , Pelvic Pain , Retrospective Studies , Uterine Neoplasms/pathologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to assess the effectiveness of the ovarian drilling, compare the techniques by fertiloscopy or by laparoscopy, and search for prognostic factors of success. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study focused on 154 ovarian drilling carried out between June 1998 and December 2010 where the drilling has been proposed after failure of the clomifene and before stimulation by FSH among PCOS patients. RESULTS: The post-drilling ovulation rate is 62%. The spontaneous on-going pregnancy rate is 31% and the total pregnancy rate scalable including secondary stimulation is 58%. No significant difference was found between laparoscopy and the fertiloscopy. The peroperative complications in fertiloscopy were more frequent but without consequences and 20% of the fertiloscopy had to be converted to laparoscopy, half of them for complications and half of them for technical difficulties. The only found preoperative predictors of success are an euthyroidy that increases the chances of pregnancy in general (including the side stimulation) and a lower FSH levels. However, it appears that the chances of pregnancy in FSH stimulation are dramatically decreased if the drilling did not induce ovulation versus the cases where it induced ovulation but no pregnancy (28.8% versus 58.1%, P<0.003). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Fertiloscopy results are comparable with those of laparoscopy, which suggests an advantage to this technique in terms of cost, comfort, and length of hospital stay. No usable in practice patient selection criteria could be highlighted. The study suggests that the absence of ovulation after drilling may be a direct indication for IVF.
Subject(s)
Infertility, Female/surgery , Ovary/surgery , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/surgery , Adult , Female , Follicle Stimulating Hormone/administration & dosage , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Humans , Infertility, Female/etiology , Laparoscopy/methods , Ovulation Induction/methods , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/complications , Pregnancy , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Assess residents satisfaction within their participation to a short and structured training to laparoscopy, gathering theoretical and practical issues. METHODS: This course was divided in two periods of 3days including an individual prospective evaluation. For each period, the residents have answered to three questionnaires trying to evaluate their experience in laparoscopy and their short term and medium term satisfaction. RESULTS: Three hundred residents from different French university hospitals have been involved in this study. After 4years, half of them were not satisfied with their chirurgical studies. Thirty-seven percent of them never attended to any surgical procedure as main operator. The training course has answered to their expectation for 95% of the residents and 85% said they now feel more confident about laparoscopy then before. According to 76% of them, it should be a compulsory and systematic training course and for 75%, they should be tested regarding their laparoscopy skills level during the resident studies period. The training on animals is the more efficient for 86% of them. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the increasing number of residents and to the legal time for rest, the time spent in the operative room has decreased. People also do not accept easily the training made on true patients. Intensive and tested training are useful and answer to residents needs. They could be systematically integrated in their global curriculum.