ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Real-time cardiac magnetic resonance generates spatially and temporally resolved images of cardiac anatomy and function, without the need for contrast agent or X-ray exposure. Cardiac magnetic resonance-guided right heart catheterization (CMR-RHC) combines the benefits of cardiac magnetic resonance and invasive cardiac catheterization. The clinical adoption of CMR-RHC represents the first step towards the development of cardiac magnetic resonance-guided therapeutic procedures. AIM: To describe the feasibility, safety and diagnostic yield of CMR-RHC in consecutive all-comer patients with clinical indications for right heart catheterization. METHODS: From December 2018 to May 2021, 35 consecutive patients with prespecified indications for right heart catheterization were scheduled for CMR-RHC via the femoral route under local anaesthesia in a 1.5T cardiac magnetic resonance suite equipped for interventional cardiac magnetic resonance. The duration of various procedural components and safety data were recorded. Success rate (defined by the ability to record all prespecified haemodynamic measurements and imaging metrics), adverse events and patient/physician perprocedural comfort were assessed. RESULTS: One patient withdrew his consent before the study, and scanner troubleshooting occurred in one case. Among the 33 remaining patients, prespecified cardiac magnetic resonance imaging metrics were obtained in all patients, whereas full CMR-RHC measurements were obtained in 30 patients (91%). A dedicated cardiac magnetic resonance-compatible wire was used in 25/33 procedures. CMR-RHC was completed in 29±16minutes, and the total duration of the procedure, including conventional cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, was 62±20minutes. There were no adverse events and no femoral haematomas. Procedural comfort was deemed good by the patients and operators for all procedures. CMR-RHC significantly impacted diagnosis or patient management in 28/33 patients (85%). CONCLUSIONS: CMR-RHC seems to be a feasible and safe procedure that can be used in routine daily practice in consecutive adults with an impactful clinical yield.
Subject(s)
Cardiac Catheterization , Heart , Adult , Humans , Feasibility Studies , Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects , Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/adverse effects , Magnetic Resonance SpectroscopySubject(s)
Cardiac Catheterization/instrumentation , Cardiac Catheters , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Mitral Valve Annuloplasty/instrumentation , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/therapy , Mitral Valve , Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects , Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Hemodynamics , Humans , Mitral Valve/physiopathology , Mitral Valve Annuloplasty/adverse effects , Mitral Valve Annuloplasty/methods , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/diagnosis , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/physiopathology , Patient Selection , Prosthesis Design , Risk Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: MAVERIC (Mitral Valve Repair Clinical Trial) reports the safety and efficacy of the ARTO system in patients with symptomatic heart failure and functional mitral regurgitation (FMR). BACKGROUND: The ARTO system percutaneously modifies the mitral annulus to improve leaflet coaptation in FMR. METHODS: The MAVERIC trial is a prospective, nonrandomized first-in-human study. Key inclusion criteria were systolic heart failure New York Heart Association functional classes II to IV, FMR grade ≥2+, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction ≤40%, LV end-diastolic diameter >50 mm and ≤75 mm. Exclusion criteria were clinical variables that precluded feasibility of the ARTO procedure. Primary outcomes were safety (30-day major adverse events) and efficacy (MR reduction, LV volumes, and functional status). RESULTS: Eleven patients received the ARTO system, and there were no procedural adverse events. From baseline to 30 days, there were meaningful improvements. Effective regurgitant orifice area decreased from 30.3 ± 11.1 mm(2) to 13.5 ± 7.1 mm(2) and regurgitant volumes from 45.4 ± 15.0 ml to 19.5 ± 10.2 ml. LV end-systolic volume index improved from 77.5 ± 24.3 ml/m(2) to 68.5 ± 21.4 ml/m(2), and LV end-diastolic volume index 118.7 ± 28.6 ml/m(2) to 103.9 ± 21.2 ml/m(2). Mitral annular anteroposterior diameter decreased from 45.0 ± 3.3 mm to 38.7 ± 3.0 mm. Functional status was 81.8% New York Heart Association functional class III/IV improving to 54.6% functional class I/II. At 30 days, there were 2 adverse events: 1 pericardial effusion requiring surgical drainage; and 1 asymptomatic device dislodgement. CONCLUSIONS: The ARTO system is a novel transcatheter device that can be used safely with meaningful efficacy in the treatment of FMR. (Mitral Valve Repair Clinical Trial [MAVERIC]; NCT02302872).
