Negative effects during multicomponent group-based treatment: A multisite study.

Objective Negative effects (NEs) in group treatments remain an under-researched area. This study aimed to explore the prevalence of various types of NEs in a multicomponent group-based treatment and to determine their predictors. Method: A total of 330 patients participating in a multicomponent group-based treatment were recruited across seven clinical sites. At the end of treatment, the Negative Effects Questionnaire (NEQ) was used to measure NEs. Item-level descriptive analysis was conducted to explore the prevalence of various types of NEs, and structural equation modeling was used to determine predictors of these NEs. Results: The most frequently reported type of NEs was the worsening of symptoms, and the single most frequently reported item was the resurfacing of unpleasant memories. Predictors of NEs included the overall distress level, alexithymia, attachment avoidance, low working alliance, problem actuation, and worse outcomes; psychological mindedness was a protective factor. Conclusion: Patients who experience higher levels of distress at the beginning of treatment, who perceive the group working alliance as problematic, and who experience high in-session emotional arousal related to their problem seem to be especially prone to reporting NEs. Furthermore, the findings do not support the assumption that NEs are a prerequisite for therapeutic change.Trial registration: ISRCTN.org identifier: ISRCTN13532466.

Mechanisms of change in multicomponent group-based treatment for patients suffering from medically unexplained physical symptoms.

Understanding psychological mechanisms of change is essential to advance treatments for patients suffering from medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS). This study aimed to test the role of selected change mechanisms (incl. interoceptive awareness, emotional regulation skills, symptom acceptance, relational needs satisfaction, clarification of meaning, working alliance, and group cohesion) in the modification of patients' somatic symptom intensity and well-being.N = 290 patients suffering from MUPS participated in a multi-component group-based treatment at seven clinical sites. Data were collected weekly. Multi-level modeling was used to test cross-lagged relationships between the hypothesized mechanisms and outcomes in terms of Granger causality (with lags of 1, 2, and 3 weeks).None of the mechanisms predicted a time-lagged change in outcomes in the expected direction. In fact, there was a consistent pattern of negative time-lagged relationships (i.e., an increase in a mechanism predicted worsening of the outcome). Findings consistent with the hypothesized role of the mechanisms were found only in concurrent relationships between mechanisms and outcomes.This study did not support time-lagged relationships under the condition of weekly measurement and many methodological factors remain to be considered (e.g., a finer time resolution).

Corrigendum: Validation of the Czech Version of the Relational Needs Satisfaction Scale.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00359.].

Therapeutic change mechanisms in adults with medically unexplained physical symptoms: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Although psychological treatments for patients suffering from medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS) show promising results, evidence for their effectiveness is still limited. The aim of this study was to review the existing empirical support for change mechanisms that explain treatment effect in terms of symptom intensity and symptom interference in the daily lives of patients. METHODS: A systematic database search was conducted. Sixty-seven eligible studies were found, and change mechanism effects were extracted from them. The data were subjected to a systematic review. RESULTS: Fifteen change mechanisms were identified. Those receiving the most consistent support included Increasing symptom acceptance, Development of coping strategies, and Positive treatment expectations, although the last mechanism was investigated in only two studies. Almost all mechanisms received support for at least one type of outcome, either at post-treatment or at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Although some empirical support exists for many mechanisms, some of them have received only marginal attention in empirical studies. These limitations prevented us from deriving more definite conclusions.

Validation of the Czech Version of the Relational Needs Satisfaction Scale.

AIM: If we want to understand people's satisfaction in their relationships, it is essential to have a valid and reliable measure of relational needs satisfaction. The aim of this study was to test the factor structure of the Czech version of the Relational Needs Satisfaction Scale (RNSS) as well as the scale's measurement invariance and convergent validity. METHOD: In total, 419 adults answered a battery of measures, including the RNSS, in an online survey. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to test the factor structure and the measurement invariance of the RNSS across gender and age. A correlational analysis was conducted to assess the convergent validity. RESULTS: The five-factor structure of the RNSS was confirmed. Furthermore, support for a second-order global relationship satisfaction factor was found. The hierarchical model was strictly invariant with respect to gender and age. Furthermore, the RNSS demonstrated an expected pattern of correlations with the reference instruments. CONCLUSION: The Czech version of the RNSS can be considered a valid and reliable method.