Increased risk of all-cause mortality associated with domperidone use in Parkinson's patients: a population-based cohort study in the UK.

AIMS: Domperidone is used to treat gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and is linked to an increased risk of mortality. We sought to examine the risk of all-cause mortality associated with domperidone exposure in PD. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink database (1987-2011). The first recorded PD diagnosis defined index date. Time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) of all-cause mortality associated with domperidone use. PD patients were stratified by domperidone use (current/recent/past), with never used as the referent. Current domperidone users were stratified by daily dose, domperidone duration and other anti-Parkinson's medications. A secondary analysis compared PD patients to matched (1:1) non-PD patients. RESULTS: A total of 5114 PD patients were identified. Current use of domperidone among PD patients was associated with a two-fold increase in all-cause mortality (HRadj  = 2.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.64-2.45), as compared to patients never exposed to domperidone. All-cause mortality risk was highest in those starting domperidone in the previous month [HRadj  = 2.97, 95% CI: 2.06-4.27]. When compared to matched non-PD patients, PD was associated with a 43% increased risk of all-cause mortality, yet this increased to a 2.4-fold increased risk among PD patients currently using domperidone. CONCLUSION: Current use of domperidone was associated with a two-fold increased mortality risk in PD patients, as compared to PD patients that never used domperidone. The risk is highest in the first month of use and does not appear to be attributable to PD alone.

Risk of fracture in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.

INTRODUCTION: In this study we evaluated fracture risk in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (1987-2012). Each patient with CMT disease was matched with up to 6 patients without a history of CMT disease. The outcome measure was fractures. RESULTS: The risk of non-osteoporotic fracture was statistically significantly increased [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 1.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-2.14], whereas risk of any and osteoporotic fracture did not reach statistical significance compared with control patients [AHR 1.31 (95% CI 0.98-1.74) and AHR 1.10 (95% CI 0.69-1.74), respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: CMT patients have a 1.5-fold increased risk for non-osteoporotic fracture. Studies with larger numbers of CMT patients and with additional data on CMT subtype, bone mineral density, and functional status should be performed to confirm a true association between CMT and an increased risk of fracture.

Five-year fracture risk estimation in patients with Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) are at increased risk of fractures. However, no specific prediction model for fracture estimation among PD patients is currently available. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a simple score for estimating the 5-year osteoporotic and hip fracture risks among patients with PD. METHODS: The U.K. Clinical Practice Research Datalink (1987-2011) was used to identify incident PD patients. Cox proportional-hazards models were used to calculate the 5-year risks of osteoporotic and hip fracture among PD patients. The regression model was fitted with various risk factors for fracture and the final Cox model was converted into integer risk scores. RESULTS: We identified 4411 incident PD patients without a history of osteoporotic treatment. The 5-year risks of osteoporotic and hip fracture were plotted in relation to the risk score. Risk scores increased with age, female gender, history of renal disease and history of dementia. The C-statistic, which is a parameter to test the internal validity of the model, was reasonable for the prediction of osteoporotic fracture (0.69) and hip fracture (0.73). CONCLUSION: In this study, we developed a simple model to estimate 5-year fracture risk among incident PD patients. It may be useful in daily practice after external validation.

Use of organic nitrates and the risk of hip fracture: a population-based case-control study.

CONTEXT: Use of organic nitrates has been associated with increased bone mineral density. Moreover, a large Danish case-control study reported a decreased fracture risk. However, the association with duration of nitrate use, dose frequency, and impact of discontinuation has not been extensively studied. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the association between organic nitrates and hip fracture risk. METHODS: A case-control study was conducted using the Dutch PHARMO Record Linkage System (1991-2002, n = 6,763 hip fracture cases and 26,341 controls). Cases had their first admission for hip fracture, whereas controls had not sustained any fracture after enrollment. Current users of organic nitrates were patients who had received a prescription within 90 d before the index date. The analyses were adjusted for disease and drug history. RESULTS: Current use of nitrates was not associated with a decreased risk of hip fracture [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 0.93; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.83-1.04]. Those who used as-needed medication only had a lower risk of hip fracture (adjusted OR = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.63-1.08) compared with users of maintenance medication only (adjusted OR = 1.17; 95% CI = 0.97-1.40). No association was found between duration of nitrate use and fracture risk. CONCLUSIONS: Our overall analyses showed that risk of a hip fracture was significantly lower among users of as-needed organic nitrates, when compared with users of maintenance medication. Our analyses of hip fracture risks with duration of use did not further support a beneficial effect of organic nitrates on hip fracture, although residual confounding may have masked beneficial effects.

Risk of hip/femur fracture after stroke: a population-based case-control study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Stroke increases the risk of hip/femur fracture, as seen in several studies, although the time course of this increased risk remains unclear. Therefore, our purpose is to evaluate this risk and investigate the time course of any elevated risk. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study using the Dutch PHARMO Record Linkage System database. Cases (n=6763) were patients with a first hip/femur fracture; controls were matched by age, sex, and region. Odds ratio (OR) for the risk of hip/femur fracture was derived using conditional logistic regression analysis, adjusted for disease and drug history. RESULTS: An increased risk of hip/femur fracture was observed in patients who experienced a stroke at any time before the index date (adjusted OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.65-2.33). The fracture risk was highest among patients who sustained a stroke within 3 months before the index date (adjusted OR, 3.35; 95% CI, 1.87-5.97) and among female patients (adjusted OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.73-2.59). The risk further increased among patients younger than 71 years (adjusted OR, 5.12; 95% CI, 3.00-8.75). Patients who had experienced a hemorrhagic stroke tended to be at a higher hip/femur fracture risk compared with those who had experienced an ischemic stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Stroke is associated with a 2.0-fold increase in the risk of hip/femur fracture. The risk was highest among patients younger than 71 years, females, and those whose stroke was more recent. Fall prevention programs, bone mineral density measurements, and use of bisphosphonates may be necessary to reduce the occurrence of hip/femur fractures during and after stroke rehabilitation.

Use of beta2 agonists and risk of acute myocardial infarction in patients with hypertension.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: * Use of beta(2) agonists has been associated with tachycardia, an abnormal ECG and atrial fibrillation. * Previous observational studies of the association between use of beta(2) agonists and the risk of acute myocardial infarction (MI) have demonstrated conflicting results. * Instead of a causal effect, the positive association between beta(2) agonist use and MI may be explained by latent ischaemic heart disease, which has symptoms that appear similar to respiratory complaints in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: * The majority of beta(2) agonist users in our study population did not have an increased risk of nonfatal acute MI. * Only patients with ischaemic heart disease and who had recently started beta(2) agonists had an increased risk of acute MI. * It is likely that this increased risk was related to latent cardiovascular disease rather than direct effects of beta(2) agonists. AIM: Observational retrospective studies of the association between use of beta(2) agonists and the risk of acute myocardial infarction (MI) have demonstrated conflicting results, particularly among first-time users. The aim of this study was to examine the association between beta(2) agonist use and first nonfatal acute MI. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study (2476 cases) nested in a cohort of antihypertensive drug users in the Dutch PHARMO RLS database. PHARMO RLS consists of drug dispensing linked to the national hospitalizations register. Each case of nonfatal acute MI was matched with up to 12 control patients by gender, age and region. Drug and disease history and the severity of the underlying respiratory disease were adjusted for. RESULTS: Risk of acute MI was increased in current beta(2) agonist users [crude odds ratio (OR) 1.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15, 1.61]. However, this excess risk was reduced after adjustment for severity of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (adjusted OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.93, 1.49). The risk was highest in patients with ischaemic heart disease and low cumulative dose of beta(2) agonists (adjusted OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.60, 3.82). CONCLUSION: Most users of beta(2) agonists did not have an increased risk of acute MI. Only patients with ischaemic heart disease with low cumulative exposure to beta(2) agonists had an increased risk of acute MI. It is likely that this increased risk was related to latent cardiovascular disease rather than to the direct effects of beta(2) agonists.

Use of inhaled corticosteroids and the risk of non-fatal acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Use of inhaled corticosteroids may reduce the risk of acute myocardial infarction (MI) through reductions in systemic inflammation and C-reactive protein. OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between the use of inhaled corticosteroids and the risk of non-fatal acute MI. METHODS: In the Dutch PHARMO record linkage system database, we conducted a case-control study (2476 MI cases), nested in a cohort of antihypertensive drug users. The use of inhaled corticosteroids 100 days before the index date was compared with never use. We adjusted the analyses for the severity of the underlying respiratory disease and general drug and disease history. RESULTS: We found that the use of inhaled corticosteroids was not associated with a decreased risk of non-fatal MI in antihypertensive drug users after adjustment for the underlying respiratory disease severity, adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.97-1.57. A higher daily dose (adjusted OR 1.82, 95% CI 0.80-4.13) and longer duration of use (adjusted OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.90-1.81) were not associated with a decreased risk of non-fatal MI. An inhaled corticosteroid dispensing in the 30 days before the index date was not protective but resulted in a 1.7-fold increased risk of non-fatal MI. CONCLUSION: Our results do not support the hypothesis that inhaled corticosteroids protect against the risk of non-fatal MI by a reduction of systemic inflammation.

Use of beta-2 agonists and risk of hip/femur fracture: a population-based case-control study.

INTRODUCTION: Administration of beta-2 agonists decreased bone mineral density in rats. But the association between bronchodilators and fracture risk has not been studied in humans. OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between use of beta-2 agonists and risk of hip/femur fracture. METHODS: We conducted a population-based case-control study (6763 cases) in the Dutch PHARMO database. Current beta-2 agonist use was compared to never use. We adjusted for severity of the underlying respiratory disease and disease and drug history. RESULTS: A hospitalisation for asthma/COPD in the year before index date increased risk of hip/femur fracture: crude OR 2.17 (95% CI, 1.41-3.34). Patients using higher doses of beta-2 agonists had increased risk of hip/femur fracture: crude OR 1.94 (95% CI, 1.41-2.66) for daily dosages of >or=1600 microg albuterol equivalent. The excess fracture risk reduced after adjustment for disease severity (1.46; 95% CI, 1.02-2.08) and after exclusion of oral glucocorticoid users (1.31; 95% CI, 0.80-2.15). Risk of hip/femur fracture was similar between users of beta-2 agonists, inhaled glucocorticoids and anticholinergics. CONCLUSION: We found increases in the risk of hip/femur fracture in patients using higher doses of beta-2 agonists. However, the excess risk of hip/femur fracture substantially reduced after exclusion of oral glucocorticoid users and after adjustment for the underlying disease. Risk of hip/femur fracture was similar between users of beta-2 agonists, inhaled glucocorticoids and anticholinergics. The severity of the underlying disease, rather than the use of beta-2 agonists, may play an important role in the aetiology of hip/femur fractures in patients using beta-2 agonists.