Long-term study of re-infection following successful eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection.

BACKGROUND: 'Re-infection' with Helicobacter pylori after eradication has been estimated to occur in 0-14% of patients, although most so-called 're-infections' occur within the first year following 'eradication' and many may actually be due to recrudescence of a temporarily suppressed infection. AIM: To study the true re-infection rate, we have studied re-infection rates after eradication therapy by excluding the first year's data, minimizing the possible confounding effect of recrudescence. METHODS: All patients tested for H. pylori infection following eradication therapy between 1987 and 2004 were evaluated. Testing was carried out by urea breath test and gastric biopsy. Patients were included if they were found to be negative for H. pylori infection by testing at least 1 year following eradication and underwent at least one further test for H. pylori. RESULTS: 1162 patients met the inclusion criteria with median post-eradication follow-up of 3 years (1.5-14) including 4668 tests; 3319 years of follow-up were analysed. Thirteen cases of re-infection occurred (re-infection rate 0.4% per year). CONCLUSIONS: This large study of H. pylori re-infection avoided cases of recrudescence by excluding the first post-eradication year. True re-infection is probably less common than previously thought.

Helicobacter pylori reinfection after apparent eradication--the Ipswich experience.

The reported rate of Helicobacter pylori reinfection following eradication therapy is highly variable. In Ipswich, the 14C-urea breath test (UBT) has been used since 1986 as a tool to study H. pylori eradication and reinfection. Updated results from 1182 patients in whom the organism had apparently been successfully eradicated, following a number of different eradication regimens between October 1986 and 31 March 1995, are presented. During this period, 57 "reinfections' were observed, of which 45 had occurred within 6 months of treatment. After the first year, the 'reinfection' rate was less than 0.6% per year. The criterion for eradication of the infection was a UBT (2-hour area under curve) of less than 40 at least 1 month after treatment. The treatment regimens were arbitrarily divided into five groups with eradication rates of: less than 20%, 20-39%, 40-59%, 60-79% and over 80%. In these groups, the 6-month 'reinfection' rates were 28.0%, 15.8%, 16.4%, 4.6% and 1.7%, respectively (p < 0.001). These and other data presented in the paper strongly suggest that, in Westernized countries, most so-called reinfections in adults are in fact the late recrudescence of a suppressed infection rather than a true reinfection. Our data also suggest that the true reinfection rate is particularly low if the eradication therapy chosen has an efficacy of more than 85%. Several effective and well-tolerated 1-week triple H. pylori eradication regimens are now available, and we would advocate their use in preference to the less effective dual regimens where initial eradication rates are lower and there is consequently a higher risk of 'reinfection'. We would predict that even in developing countries with a high prevalence of metronidazole-resistant H. pylori, the 'reinfection' rate would be low if a combination of omeprazole, amoxycillin and clarithromycin were to be used.

Rapid eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Current Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy for peptic ulcer disease usually involves a 2-week course of either a bismuth preparation or omeprazole in combination with antibiotics. We have studied a shorter, 7-day course of treatment to assess efficacy and tolerability. METHODS: Four hundred and thirty-six patients, in three non-randomized groups, received omeprazole (40 mg mane), amoxycillin (500 mg t.d.s.) and metronidazole (400 mg t.d.s.): 308 patients received the triple combination for 14 days; 80 patients were treated for 7 days; and 48 patients received omeprazole and amoxycillin for 7 days but metronidazole for only 5 days. RESULTS: Helicobacter pylori was eradicated in 89.5%, 91.1% and 87.5%, respectively (98.3%, 92.9% and 100% of metronidazole-sensitive isolates and 75.6% and 88.2% of metronidazole-resistant isolates in the first two groups). Side effects were significantly more frequent in patients who received 14 days (49%) compared with 7 days of treatment (33%); only 8/308 and 1/128 patients, respectively, failed to complete the course. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of efficacy, tolerability and cost, we conclude that a 7-day course of the omeprazole (40 mg mane), amoxycillin (500 mg t.d.s.) plus metronidazole (400 mg t.d.s.) combination is effective therapy for the eradication of H. pylori.

Helicobacter pylori eradication in patients with peptic ulcer disease: clinical consequences and financial implications.

We assessed clinical consequences and financial implications of Helicobacter pylori eradication in 175 patients with peptic ulceration, of whom 106 had been free from H. pylori infection for a mean of 3.2 years, while 69 remained infected. We used quarterly questionnaires to examine consumption of ulcer-healing medication and antacids. In the 106 successfully treated patients, gastrointestinal haemorrhage as a complication of peptic ulcer complications during the 344 patient years after eradication (0.003 per patient year) was 18-fold lower than during the 912 patient years before eradication (0.056 per patient year). Of the H. pylori-negative patients, 12-18% used ulcer-healing medication during any one of the three-month periods of the survey, compared with 34-51% of the patients with residual H. pylori infection. The average cost of the ulcer-healing drugs consumed by the H. pylori-negative patients was 30.59 pounds during the 12 months of the survey, compared with 99.05 pounds for H. pylori-positive patients. Consumption of antacids was also lower in the H. pylori-negative group. Successful eradication of H. pylori significantly reduced the annual cost of ulcer-healing drugs consumed by the patients with ulcer disease. Maintenance of ulcer remission following successful eradication of H. pylori also significantly reduced ulcer complications.

Helicobacter pylori eradication: efficacy and side effect profile of a combination of omeprazole, amoxycillin and metronidazole compared with four alternative regimens.

We evaluated eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection in 263 patients by a new 14-day regimen of omeprazole 40 mg mane (a gastric secretory inhibitor) plus two antibiotics: amoxycillin 500 mg three-times daily (tds) plus metronidazole 400 mg tds. The comparative groups included updated results of our previous work with a 14-day course of either standard triple therapy (STT, colloidal bismuth subcitrate 120 mg four times daily (qds) plus tetracycline 500 mg qds and metronidazole 400 mg tds), omeprazole 40 mg once daily plus amoxycillin 500 mg tds (OA), or two modified triple therapy: either Borody's (BTT) of all three components (colloidal bismuth subcitrate 120 mg, tetracycline 500 mg, metronidazole 200 mg) qds instead of tds, or Logan's (LTT) seven-day therapeutic regimen of colloidal bismuth subcitrate 120 mg qds, amoxycillin 500 mg qds and, for the last three days, metronidazole 400 mg five times daily. Omeprazole/amoxycillin/metronidazole (OAM) therapy was better tolerated than STT (course completion 98.1% vs. 81.4%, p < 0.001). H. pylori was eradicated by OAM therapy in 53/55 (96.4%) patients with metronidazole-sensitive organisms and in 54/72 (75.0%) with metronidazole-resistant isolates (p < 0.01). The respective corresponding rates for STT and OA therapy were 20/22 (90.9%) and 14/29 (48.3%), (metronidazole-sensitive organisms) and 7/21 (33.3%) and 15/31 (48.4%) (infections resistant to metronidazole). BTT and LTT were also better tolerated than STT. The eradication rate for BTT was 23/26 (88.5%) but that for LTT, the best tolerated of the five treatment regimens, was only 19/28 (67.9%) when pretreatment isolates were metronidazole-sensitive.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Reinfection or recrudescence after apparently successful eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection: implications for treatment of patients with duodenal ulcer disease.

Helicobacter pyloris is considered to be aetiologically implicated in gastritis and peptic ulceration, since if H. pyloris infection can be eradicated the risk of subsequent ulcer relapse is markedly reduced. The rate of 'reinfection' following treatment ranges from 0% to 45%, but its origin remains controversial (reappearance of uneradicated original infection or a fresh infection). To distinguish temporary suppression of H. pylori from fresh infection we conducted a retrospective analysis of the criteria used to establish eradication of the original infection in 304 patients. We used the [14C]urea breath test, in which an integrated area under the curve (AUC) value of < 40 in 2 h is considered to indicate eradication of H. pylori in patients tested 1 month after treatment. The results suggest that relapsed infection with H. pylori usually represents recrudescence of the original infection rather than a fresh infection; there was a higher relapse rate in patients with a breath test AUC > 20 < 40, compared with those with an AUC < 20. All 'reinfections' occurred within 24 months of the original treatment. 'Reinfection' was uncommon in patients receiving powerful therapeutic regimens (e.g. triple therapy) compared with those receiving monotherapy or relatively ineffective dual therapy combinations. In patients whose urea breath test remains negative 12 months after treatment the subsequent reinfection rate is only 0.44%/year. This supports the strategy of eradicating H. pylori infection from suitable peptic ulcer patients.

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori and its effect in peptic ulcer disease.

Since Helicobacter pylori was first cultured 10 years ago, there have been remarkable changes in our approach to the therapy of peptic ulcer disease. We now know that 90% of duodenal ulcer patients and 70% of all gastric ulcer patients are infected with H. pylori. Evidence is presented that the relapse rate of both duodenal and gastric ulcers can be substantially reduced if the bacterium is eradicated from the patient's stomach. Some of the anti-H. pylori eradication regimens currently available are discussed, with particular emphasis on the relative merits of standard triple therapy and an omeprazole/amoxycillin combination.

Short report: omeprazole plus antibiotic combinations for the eradication of metronidazole-resistant Helicobacter pylori.

Twenty-eight Helicobacter pylori-positive patients with metronidazole-resistant isolates and 25 with metronidazole-sensitive isolates were treated for 14 days with 40 mg omeprazole nocte plus 500 mg amoxycillin t.d.s. Eradication of H. pylori, defined as absence of the organism one month after cessation of treatment, was assessed using the [14C]urea breath test. The eradication rate in patients with metronidazole-resistant isolates was 14/28 (50%) while that in patients was metronidazole-sensitive isolates was 12/25 (48%). In contrast to these encouraging eradication rates, very poor results were obtained with a 7-day course of omeprazole (40 mg nocte) in combination with erythromycin ethylsuccinate (500 mg q.d.s.) and tripotassium dicitrato bismuthate tablets (120 mg q.d.s.). The latter eradication rates were 3/20 (15%) in patients taking erythromycin tablets and 3/19 (16%) in those taking a liquid formulation of erythromycin. All treatment regimens were well tolerated and all patients completed the prescribed course of therapy.