Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Cancer Res ; 13(10): 2977-85, 2007 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17504999

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine the clinical toxicities and antibody response against sTn and tumor cells expressing sTn following immunization of high-risk breast cancer patients with clustered sTn-KLH [sTn(c)-KLH] conjugate plus QS-21. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Twenty-seven patients with no evidence of disease and with a history of either stage IV no evidence of disease, rising tumor markers, stage II (>or=4 positive axillary nodes), or stage III disease received a total of five injections each during weeks 1, 2, 3, 7, and 19. Immunizations consisted of sTn(c)-KLH conjugate containing 30, 10, 3, or 1 microg sTn(c) plus 100 microg QS-21. Induction of IgM and IgG antibodies against synthetic sTn(c) and natural sTn on ovine submaxillary mucin were measured before and after therapy. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analyses assessed reactivity of antibodies to LSC and MCF-7 tumor cells. RESULTS: The most common toxicities were transient local skin reactions at the injection site and mild flu-like symptoms. All patients developed significant IgM and IgG antibody titers against sTn(c). Antibody titers against ovine submaxillary mucin were usually of lower titers. IgM reactivity with LSC tumor cells was observed in 21 patients and with MCF-7 cells in 13 patients. There was minimal IgG reactivity with LSC cells. CONCLUSION: Immunization with sTn(c)-KLH conjugate plus QS-21 is well tolerated and immunogenic in high-risk breast cancer patients. Future trials will incorporate sTn(c) as a component of a multiple antigen vaccine.


Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Immunologic/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/prevention & control , Cancer Vaccines/therapeutic use , Saponins/therapeutic use , Adjuvants, Immunologic/adverse effects , Adult , Antibodies/blood , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Cancer Vaccines/adverse effects , Cancer Vaccines/immunology , Female , Humans , Immunization , Immunoglobulin M/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Risk , Saponins/adverse effects , Saponins/immunology
2.
Am J Community Psychol ; 38(3-4): 153-64, 2006 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17028998

ABSTRACT

There is growing enthusiasm for community-academic partnerships to promote health in underserved communities. Drawing upon resources available at a comprehensive cancer center, we developed the ACCESS program to guide community based organizations through a flexible program planning process. Over a three-year period, ACCESS partnered with 67 agencies serving various medically underserved populations. Organizations included hospitals, parishes, senior centers, harm reduction programs, and recreational facilities. Program outcomes at the organizational level were quantified in terms of introduction of new cancer information, referral or screening programs, as well as organizational capacity building. ACCESS represents a viable model for promoting partnership to transfer behavioral health programs and adapt interventions for new audiences. Plans to further evaluate and enhance this model to promote cancer screening efforts are discussed. We argue that, ultimately, formation and development of community partnerships need to be understood as a fundamental area of practice that must be systematically integrated into the mission of major academic medical institutions in every area of public health.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Community Health Planning/organization & administration , Community-Institutional Relations/standards , Health Education , Interprofessional Relations , Mass Screening/methods , Academic Medical Centers , Adult , Cancer Care Facilities , Demography , Female , Humans , Mass Screening/organization & administration , Middle Aged , Organizational Affiliation , United States
3.
J Immunol ; 174(9): 5706-12, 2005 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15843572

ABSTRACT

One of several effector mechanisms thought to contribute to Ab efficacy against cancer is complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC). Serological analysis of a series of clinical trials conducted over a 10-year period suggested that six vaccines containing different glycolipids induced Abs mediating CDC whereas four vaccines containing carbohydrate or peptide epitopes carried almost exclusively by mucin molecules induced Abs that did not mediate CDC. To explore this further, we have now compared cell surface reactivity using flow cytometry assays (FACS), complement-fixing ability, and CDC activity of a panel of mAbs and immune sera from these trials on the same two tumor cell lines. Abs against glycolipids GM2, globo H and Lewis Y, protein KSA (epithelial cell adhesion molecule, also known as EpCAM) and mucin Ags Tn, sialylated Tn, Thomsen Friedenreich (TF), and MUC1 all reacted comparably by FACS with tumor cells expressing these Ags. Compared with the strong complement binding and CDC with Abs against glycolipids and KSA, complement binding was diminished with Abs against mucin Ags and no CDC was detected. A major difference between these two groups of Ags is proximity to the cell membrane. Glycolipids and globular glycoproteins extend less than 100 A from the cell membrane while mucins extend up to 5000 A. Although complement activation at sites remote from the cell membrane has long been known as a mechanism for resistance from complement lysis in bacteria, it is identified here for the first time as a factor which may contribute to resistance from CDC against cancer cells.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Neoplasm/physiology , Complement System Proteins/physiology , Cytotoxicity, Immunologic/immunology , Glycolipids/immunology , Mucins/immunology , Neoplasm Proteins/immunology , Antibodies, Monoclonal/metabolism , Antibodies, Monoclonal/toxicity , Antibodies, Neoplasm/metabolism , Antibodies, Neoplasm/toxicity , Binding Sites, Antibody , Cancer Vaccines/administration & dosage , Cancer Vaccines/immunology , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Membrane/immunology , Cell Membrane/metabolism , Complement Activation/immunology , Complement Membrane Attack Complex/metabolism , Humans , Immune Sera/metabolism , Immune Sera/toxicity
4.
Vaccine ; 23(24): 3114-22, 2005 May 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15837210

ABSTRACT

GPI-0100 is a semi-synthetic saponin with modifications designed to augment stability and diminish toxicity. Two batches of GPI-0100 (the second with higher purity) were tested with doses ranging between 100 and 5000 microg in groups of five treated prostate cancer patients who had no evidence of disease except for rising PSA levels. GPI-0100 was mixed with a bivalent vaccine containing the glycolipid Globo H and the glycosylated mucin MUC2 conjugated to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH). All doses were well tolerated and antibody titers against Globo H and MUC-2 escalated with the increasing dose levels. At the 5000 microg dose level in this patient population, toxicity remained minimal with only occasional grade II local toxicity at vaccination sites and occasional sporadic grade I elevations in ALT. Compared with a subsequent trial with the same bivalent vaccine plus QS-21 at the maximal tolerated dose of 100 microg, the 5000 microg dose of GPI-0100 produced comparable antibody titers.


Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Immunologic/therapeutic use , Cancer Vaccines/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Saponins/therapeutic use , Vaccines, Conjugate/therapeutic use , Adjuvants, Immunologic/adverse effects , Aged , Cancer Vaccines/adverse effects , Cancer Vaccines/immunology , Dose-Response Relationship, Immunologic , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Flow Cytometry , Humans , Immunization Schedule , Immunotherapy , Male , Middle Aged , Prostate-Specific Antigen/analysis , Recurrence , Saponins/adverse effects , Vaccines, Conjugate/adverse effects , Vaccines, Conjugate/immunology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...