Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Transplant ; 34(4): e13833, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32072689

ABSTRACT

The advent of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) has provided the impetus to transplant kidneys from hepatitis C virus-positive donors into uninfected recipients (D+/R-). Thirty D+/R- patients received DAA treatment. Sustained virologic response (SVR12) was defined as an undetectable viral load in 12 weeks after treatment. An age-matched cohort of uninfected donor and recipient pairs (D-/R-) transplanted during same time period was used for comparison. The median day of viral detection was postoperative day (POD) 2. The detection of viremia in D+/R- patients was 100%. The initial median viral load was 531 copies/µL (range: 10-1 × 108 copies/µL) with a median peak viral load of 3.4 × 105 copies/µL (range: 804-1.0 × 108 copies/µL). DAAs were initiated on median POD 9 (range: 5-41 days). All 30 patients had confirmed SVR12. During a median follow-up of 10 months, patient and graft survival was 100%, and acute rejection was 6.6% with no major adverse events related to DAA treatment. Delayed graft function was significantly decreased in D+/R- patients as compared to the age-matched cohort (27% vs 60%; P = .01). D+/R- transplantation offers patients an alternative strategy to increase access.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis C, Chronic , Hepatitis C , Kidney Transplantation , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Hepacivirus , Hepatitis C/drug therapy , Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy , Humans , Kidney
2.
J Law Med Ethics ; 41 Suppl 1: 50-5, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23590741

ABSTRACT

Public health emergencies implicate difficult decisions among medical and emergency first responders about how to allocate essential resources. While various actors have proffered approaches on how to make these tough choices, meaningful guidance on shifting standards of care in major emergencies remained lacking. In March 2012, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) released additional guidance to assist facilities and practitioners to address scarce resource allocation through the development of "crisis standards of care" in catastrophes. As discussed in the article, identifying and resolving of complex practical, ethical, and legal challenges underlying real-time implementation of these standards are indispensable to protecting the public's health.


Subject(s)
Disaster Planning , Emergency Medical Services/standards , Resource Allocation/standards , Standard of Care/ethics , Standard of Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Disaster Planning/legislation & jurisprudence , Emergency Medical Services/ethics , Emergency Medical Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, U.S., Health and Medicine Division , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Public Health Administration/ethics , Public Health Administration/legislation & jurisprudence , Resource Allocation/ethics , Resource Allocation/legislation & jurisprudence , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...