Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 62
Filter
1.
Spinal Cord ; 61(9): 513-520, 2023 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37598263

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: A 5-year longitudinal, retrospective, cohort study. OBJECTIVES: Develop a prediction model based on electronic health record (EHR) data to identify veterans with spinal cord injury/diseases (SCI/D) at highest risk for new pressure injuries (PIs). SETTING: Structured (coded) and text EHR data, for veterans with SCI/D treated in a VHA SCI/D Center between October 1, 2008, and September 30, 2013. METHODS: A total of 4709 veterans were available for analysis after randomly selecting 175 to act as a validation (gold standard) sample. Machine learning models were created using ten-fold cross validation and three techniques: (1) two-step logistic regression; (2) regression model employing adaptive LASSO; (3) and gradient boosting. Models based on each method were compared using area under the receiver-operating curve (AUC) analysis. RESULTS: The AUC value for the gradient boosting model was 0.62 (95% CI = 0.54-0.70), for the logistic regression model it was 0.67 (95% CI = 0.59-0.75), and for the adaptive LASSO model it was 0.72 (95% CI = 0.65-80). Based on these results, the adaptive LASSO model was chosen for interpretation. The strongest predictors of new PI cases were having fewer total days in the hospital in the year before the annual exam, higher vs. lower weight and most severe vs. less severe grade of injury based on the American Spinal Cord Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale. CONCLUSIONS: While the analyses resulted in a potentially useful predictive model, clinical implications were limited because modifiable risk factors were absent in the models.


Subject(s)
Pressure Ulcer , Spinal Cord Diseases , Spinal Cord Injuries , Humans , Spinal Cord Injuries/complications , Spinal Cord Injuries/diagnosis , Spinal Cord Injuries/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Pressure Ulcer/diagnosis , Pressure Ulcer/epidemiology , Pressure Ulcer/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Machine Learning
2.
Home Healthc Now ; 40(3): 128-132, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35510966

ABSTRACT

This article is part of a series, Supporting Family Caregivers: No Longer Home Alone, published in collaboration with the AARP Public Policy Institute. Results of focus groups, conducted as part of the AARP Public Policy Institute's No Longer Home Alone video project, supported evidence that family caregivers aren't given the information they need to manage the complex care regimens of family members. This series of articles and accompanying videos aims to help nurses provide caregivers with the tools they need to manage their family member's health care at home. The articles in this new installment of the series explain principles for promoting safe mobility that nurses should reinforce with family caregivers. Each article also includes an informational tear sheet-Information for Family Caregivers-that contains links to instructional videos. To use this series, nurses should read the article first, so they understand how best to help family caregivers, and then encourage the caregivers to watch the videos and ask questions. For additional information, see Resources for Nurses.


Subject(s)
Caregivers , Family , Caregivers/education , Focus Groups , Humans
3.
Home Healthc Now ; 40(3): 133-138, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35510967

ABSTRACT

This article is part of a series, Supporting Family Caregivers: No Longer Home Alone, published in collaboration with the AARP Public Policy Institute. Results of focus groups, conducted as part of the AARP Public Policy Institute's No Longer Home Alone video project, supported evidence that family caregivers aren't given the information they need to manage the complex care regimens of family members. This series of articles and accompanying videos aims to help nurses provide caregivers with the tools they need to manage their family member's health care at home. The articles in this new installment of the series explain principles for promoting safe mobility that nurses should reinforce with family caregivers. Each article also includes an informational tear sheet-Information for Family Caregivers-that contains links to instructional videos. To use this series, nurses should read the article first, so they understand how best to help family caregivers, and then encourage the caregivers to watch the videos and ask questions. For additional information, see Resources for Nurses.


Subject(s)
Caregivers , Moving and Lifting Patients , Caregivers/education , Family , Focus Groups , Humans
4.
JMIR Res Protoc ; 10(7): e24974, 2021 Jul 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34255724

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patient falls are the most common adverse events reported in hospitals. Although it is well understood that the physical hospital environment contributes to nearly 40% of severe or fatal hospital falls, there are significant gaps in the knowledge about the relationship between inpatient unit design and fall rates. The few studies that have examined unit design have been conducted in a single hospital (non-Veterans Health Administration [VHA]) or a small number of inpatient units, limiting generalizability. The goal of this study is to identify unit design factors contributing to inpatient falls in the VHA. OBJECTIVE: The first aim of the study is to investigate frontline and management perceptions of and experiences with veteran falls as they pertain to inpatient environmental factors. An iterative rapid assessment process will be used to analyze the data. Interview findings will directly inform the development of an environmental assessment survey to be conducted as part of aim 2 and to contribute to interpretation of aim 2. The second aim of this study is to quantify unit design factors and compare spatial and environmental factors of units with higher- versus lower-than-expected fall rates. METHODS: We will first conduct walk-through interviews with facility personnel in 10 medical/surgical units at 3 VHA medical centers to identify environmental fall risk factors. Data will be used to finalize an environmental assessment survey for nurse managers and facilities managers. We will then use fall data from the VA Inpatient Evaluation Center and patient data from additional sources to identify 50 medical/surgical nursing units with higher- and lower-than-expected fall rates. We will measure spatial factors by analyzing computer-aided design files of unit floorplans and environmental factors from the environmental assessment survey. Statistical tests will be performed to identify design factors that distinguish high and low outliers. RESULTS: The VA Health Services Research and Development Service approved funding for the study. The research protocol was approved by institutional review boards and VA research committees at both sites. Data collection started in February 2018. Results of the data analysis are expected by February 2022. Data collection and analysis was completed for aim 1 with a manuscript of results in progress. For aim 2, the medical/surgical units were categorized into higher- and lower-than-expected fall categories, the environmental assessment surveys were distributed to facility managers and nurse managers. Data to measure spatial characteristics are being compiled. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this study is the first to objectively identify spatial risks for falls in hospitals within in a large multihospital system. Findings can contribute to evidence-based design guidelines for hospitals such as those of the Facility Guidelines Institute and the Department of Veterans Affairs. The metrics for characterizing spatial features are quantitative indices that could be incorporated in larger scale contextual studies examining contributors to falls, which to date often exclude physical environmental factors at the unit level. Space syntax measures could be used as physical environmental factors in future research examining a range of contextual factors-social, personal, organizational, and environmental-that contribute to patient falls. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/24974.

6.
Nurs Outlook ; 69(2): 147-158, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33388163

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Responding to National Academy of Medicine and National Council of State Boards of Nursing recommendations, the Department of Veterans Health Affairs (VHA) implemented full practice authority (FPA) for Advanced Practice Registered Nurses in VHA medical centers (VAMCs) in 2017. PURPOSE: To evaluate FPA policy implementation's impact on quality indicators including access to care as measured by new patient appointments in primary, specialty and mental health services. METHODS: Linear growth models compared early (n = 85) vs. late (n = 55) FPA implementing VAMCs on the trajectories of each of the three quality indicators. FINDINGS: Early FPA implementing VAMCs showed greater rates of improvement over time in new patient appointments completed within 30 days of preferred date for primary care (p = .003), specialty care (p = 0.05), and mental health (p = 0.001). DISCUSSION: VAMCs that started implementation of FPA policy early showed greater improvement in access to care for Veterans over time than VAMCs that did not.


Subject(s)
Advanced Practice Nursing/methods , Nurses/standards , Scope of Practice/trends , Advanced Practice Nursing/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Nurse's Role , Nurses/statistics & numerical data , Nurses/trends , Program Evaluation/methods , Program Evaluation/statistics & numerical data , United States , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organization & administration , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/statistics & numerical data
7.
Nurs Outlook ; 69(2): 193-201, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33308844

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Since 1999, the Veterans Health Administration's (VHA) National Nursing Education Initiative (NNEI) has provided 16,294 scholarships for registered nurses to attain baccalaureate and advanced nursing degrees. PURPOSE: The goal of this evaluation was to determine factors that enhanced or hindered a scholarship recipient in the completion of their degree and service obligation. METHODS: A regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of degree completion for 10,043 participants in 162 VHA facilities. FINDINGS: Significant predictor variables for degree completion were intended occupation, entry degree, gender, age, and year entering the program. Eighty-six percent (86.7%) of participants completed the degree requirement. Of those who completed their degree, 97% completed the service obligation. DISCUSSION: As recruitment and retention initiative, NNEI scholarships are poised to address the VHA nursing staffing shortages as well as build a highly qualified nursing workforce capable of providing the best care to our Nation's Veterans.


Subject(s)
Education, Nursing/methods , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Cohort Studies , Education, Nursing/trends , Employment/methods , Employment/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , United States , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organization & administration , Workforce/statistics & numerical data
8.
Rehabil Nurs ; 46(1): 52-61, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32657850

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Nursing home residents sit in wheelchairs (WCs) for extended periods, often with slumped posture. They often experience pneumonia, pressure ulcers, and pain. This study described WC seated posture with its selected predictors and outcomes in the nursing home environment, throughout the daytime hours of 1 day. DESIGN AND METHODS: This observational study (n = 45) in two Veterans Administration Community Living Centers introduced a new measure of WC fit and described WC seated posture of older Veterans, with selected predictors and outcomes. FINDINGS: Wheelchair seated posture was predicted by cognitive status, WC fit, WC skills, and duration of sitting, but not by level of sitting ability. Poor posture measured by the Seated Posture Scale was associated with pain. Highest interface pressures measurable were seen in peak pressure index (PPI = 200 mm Hg), indicating risk of pressure injury. Veterans often denied discomfort, possibly lowering overall pain scores, while reporting severe pain in specific body parts. CONCLUSIONS: Wheelchair seated posture was predicted by cognitive status, WC fit, WC skills, and duration of sitting. Poor posture was associated with pain, and poor posture was an outcome of poor WC fit. Poor WC fit in this study supported earlier findings in non-Veterans Administration nursing homes.


Subject(s)
Sitting Position , Veterans/statistics & numerical data , Wheelchairs/adverse effects , Aged , Assisted Living Facilities/organization & administration , Assisted Living Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Community Health Planning/methods , Community Health Planning/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , United States , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organization & administration , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/statistics & numerical data , Veterans/psychology
9.
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract ; 32(11): 745-755, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32649382

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Of 23 million US veterans, 2 million are women. Female veterans often have physical and mental health disorders, but only 6.5% use the Veterans Health Administration (VA) system. Health care for women veterans is challenging in a health care system unfamiliar with this population. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate how receipt of treatment by female veterans at a VA women's health specialty clinic affected levels of distress, quality of life (QOL), and depression. METHODS: A retrospective record review was completed on 51 female veterans between the ages of 40 and 60 years attending a VA clinic. The clinic provides comprehensive women's health services to female veterans. Multiple linear regression models were fit to explore QOL and depression levels with socioeconomic status, parity, years of service, and military sexual trauma (MST). RESULTS: Female veterans had significantly lower baseline scores for QOL than did a comparison group. The only significant predictor associated with higher health-related symptom scores at baseline was a history of MST (ß = 0.363; t = 2.44; p = .02). Means and standard deviations for total scores were significantly higher than those of the comparison group. Higher symptom scores indicated lower QOL among female veterans. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Study findings suggested that timely, comprehensive, gender-specific health care can significantly improve overall QOL and depression levels. Nurse practitioners play a leading role in providing primary care to this population with significant potential to impact QOL, depression levels, and overall health of female veterans.


Subject(s)
Quality of Life/psychology , Veterans/psychology , Adult , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , United States , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organization & administration , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/statistics & numerical data , Veterans/statistics & numerical data
10.
Brain Inj ; 34(8): 1031-1038, 2020 07 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32493066

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: As part of a larger study to test the efficacy of the Concussion Coach cell phone application for patients with post-concussion symptoms, qualitative data were gathered to assess barriers and facilitators for app use and differences in use of the app among those who declined or improved in symptom severity, or were low-use users. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a prospective descriptive study design, 35 semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted between 2016-2018. Participants had a history of mild traumatic brain injury and were symptomatic. Interview data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Primary facilitators were the app's ease of use, privacy, availability/portability, and increased self-efficacy of the user. Primary barriers were a lack of sufficient app training, stigma, overly "basic" content, and symptom severity. While there were not prominent differences among user groups, users whose symptom severity improved described using more modules of the app than users who declined. Low-users attributed not using the app to content that was too basic or to their forgetting. CONCLUSION: Interview data suggest that Concussion Coach can benefit Veterans with post-concussive symptoms through increased agency, perceived benefits to emotional well-being, and the availability of non-stigmatized strategies for symptom management.


Subject(s)
Brain Concussion , Mobile Applications , Post-Concussion Syndrome , Veterans , Humans , Post-Concussion Syndrome/diagnosis , Prospective Studies , Smartphone
11.
Work ; 66(1): 31-40, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32417811

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Increasingly, occupational and physical therapists are using safe patient handling and mobility (SPHM) equipment, such as mechanical lifts, in rehabilitation. However, there is little guidance in the literature on how SPHM equipment can be used to assist patients to reach rehabilitation goals. The purpose of this projectwas to document and categorize common and innovative ways rehabilitation therapists use SPHM equipment in their clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: This article investigates common and innovative uses of SPHM equipment in rehabilitation practice. METHODS: Occupational, physical and kinesio therapist employed at the Veterans Health Administration wrote narratives and took photos describing rehabilitation therapy activities where they used SPHM equipment in their clinical practice. The authors used a systematic process to review and categorize the narratives and subsequent photos by using the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). RESULTS: Thirty narratives (13 innovative and 17 common) were coded into four categories on the ICF section of mobility. The most common category was "changing and maintaining basic body position"(21) followed by "walking and moving" (5). The category "carrying, moving and handling objects" garnered two narratives and there were no narratives for "using transportation." CONCLUSIONS: Project findings may serve as a guide for therapists who would like to enhance their use of SPHM equipment in rehabilitation. Additional research is needed to expand the use of SPHM in rehabilitation practice and evaluate the impact on patient rehabilitation outcomes and therapist safety outcomes.


Subject(s)
Moving and Lifting Patients/instrumentation , Patient Safety , Rehabilitation/instrumentation , Humans , Occupational Therapy/instrumentation , Physical Therapy Modalities/instrumentation , Rehabilitation/methods , United States , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
12.
J Prof Nurs ; 36(1): 62-68, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32044056

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Doctoral-prepared nurses with diverse skillsets are required to meet nursing care needs in a complex and changing healthcare environment. A better understanding of the roles of doctoral-prepared nurses in Veterans Health Administration (VHA) workforce will help leverage their expertise to meet the needs of Veterans. PURPOSE: Assess the current roles of doctoral-prepared nurses within the VHA. METHOD: A cross-sectional survey was used to collect information on doctoral-prepared nurses within the VHA in 2016. Multiple strategies were used to identify doctoral-prepared nurses to recruit for an online survey. Survey invitations were sent electronically to unique individuals identified (N = 2403). RESULTS: Responses were received from 1015 nurses (42.2% response rate), with 929 nurses with a doctoral degree identified. DNP/DNAP degrees were most common (55%), followed by a PhD or DNS (33%). Significant differences were noted between nurses in different doctoral education categories across four main roles: research, clinical, educational, and administration. CONCLUSIONS: This survey generated the first comprehensive list of VHA doctoral-prepared nurses. Findings are being used by the VHA Office of Nursing Services to align degree types, duties of different positions, functional statements, and position expectations. Results support the continued need for collaboration between nurses with PhDs and DNPs to achieve research and clinical goals.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care , Education, Nursing, Graduate , Nurse's Role , Organizational Objectives , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Internet , Male , Middle Aged , Nurse Practitioners/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States , Veterans Health
13.
JMIR Res Protoc ; 8(11): e14170, 2019 Nov 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31755868

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies of community reintegration (CR) in traumatic brain injury (TBI) have been conducted in civilian populations, but research is limited in veteran and military service member populations. Little is known about how knowledge from civilian studies translates into veterans' experiences and needs. The US Department of Veterans Health Administration (VHA) recognizes the distinctive health care needs of post-9/11 veteran and military service members, particularly with TBI, including the need to bridge health and rehabilitation-related services from acute care and inpatient settings to veteran and military service members' homes and communities to facilitate CR. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study is to better understand the experiences of veterans with complicated mild, moderate, or severe TBI; their families; and CR workers as veterans and servicemembers transition to and sustain living in communities. This paper describes the rationale, design, and methods used to reach this goal. METHODS: This five-year longitudinal mixed methods study uses both a community-engaged research (CEnR) approach and an ethnographic approach. The sample includes 30 veterans and service members with TBI, 13 family caregivers, 11 CR specialists, 16 key stakeholders, and 82 community events. Interviews and observations are coded and analyzed using hierarchical coding schemes and thematic analysis. Analyses include data from surveys, interviews, and participant observations. Content analysis is used to highlight the complex social context of reintegration and to triangulate quantitative data. Egocentric (personal) social network analysis is used to examine the support system a veteran or service member has in place to facilitate reintegration. RESULTS: Study enrollment and data collection are completed. Data analyses are underway. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study may provide a heightened understanding of environmental factors affecting CR in complicated mild, moderate, or severe TBI. Veteran, servicemember and family voices and insights provide VHA clinicians and policy makers with an ecological view of CR that is grounded in the life experiences of veterans, military service members, and families. The results of this study provide a roadmap for designing and testing interventions to maximize CR in a variety of domains. The longitudinal ethnographic approach allows for capturing detailed experiences within the naturalistic context. CEnR allows collaborative assessment of the social context of reintegration with community members. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/14170.

14.
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs ; 46(1): 18-24, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30608336

ABSTRACT

Evidence suggests that inaccurate and incomplete pressure injury (PI) documentation threatens the validity of treatment and undermines policy and quality improvement. This quality improvement project sought to identify barriers and facilitators when conducting and documenting the daily comprehensive skin assessment in 31 Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) facilities. Evaluators in this 1-year, cross-sectional quality improvement project, using a qualitative approach, interviewed nurses of medical-surgical and critical care units. Participants (N = 62) from 12 high reassessment units (HRUs) and 13 low reassessment units (LRUs) were interviewed using telephone focus groups. Staff from HRUs reported 9 activities that ensured consistency in clinical practices, in validating data, and in correcting inaccuracies. The LRU staff tended to report performing only 2 of the 9 activities. The main barriers to accurate documentation were lack of knowledge, poor templates, and staffing issues such as understaffing and turnover, and main facilitators were an internal data validation process and a documentation template to local practices. Findings from this project led to increased VA leadership engagement, development of 3 innovative, award-winning VA mobile PI prevention and management applications, updated policies and directives on PI prevention, and upgrading of the national VA HAPI workgroup to an advisory committee and improved collaboration between the PI advisory committee and nursing informatics.


Subject(s)
Documentation/standards , Pressure Ulcer/therapy , Quality Improvement/trends , Cross-Sectional Studies , Data Collection/methods , Data Collection/standards , Documentation/methods , Humans , Organizational Innovation , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , United States , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organization & administration , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/trends
15.
Rehabil Nurs ; 44(4): 213-220, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29557820

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Earlier, we reported development and initial testing of a rapid, low burden measure of wheelchair seated posture (the Seated Posture Scale [SPS]) for research and clinical use. The purpose of this study was to test the intrarater reliability, interrater reliability, and criterion related validity of the SPS. DESIGN: We used a descriptive design to test and develop the instrument. METHODS: We used the method described by Walter, Donner, and Eliasziw to determine 46 participants were needed, from two Veterans Administration nursing homes or CLCs (community living centers). Using a digital goniometer to score rapidly and with two trained raters, we scored individual participants simultaneously and again in succession. For criterion related concurrent validity, we also scored each participant with Section 2 of the Seated Postural Control Measure for Adults. Intrarater reliability, interrater reliability, and criterion related, concurrent validity were assessed using kappa statistics for individual instrument items (and corresponding 95% confidence intervals where appropriate) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for total scores. FINDINGS: The intrarater intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was .995; interrater ICC was .80; interrater reliability kappas ranged from -.03 to .80. Criterion-related, concurrent validity kappas ranged from .13 to .91. ICC for total scores was .85. CONCLUSION: The SPS has sufficient preliminary validity and reliability to support measurement of wheelchair-seated posture in outcomes research and clinical use. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In the future, rehabilitation nurses may use the SPS to improve management of wheelchair seated posture, to improve clinical outcomes, particularly for those who do not reposition themselves.


Subject(s)
Posture/physiology , Research Design/standards , Sitting Position , Wheelchairs/adverse effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Nursing Homes/statistics & numerical data , Reproducibility of Results , Research Design/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Veterans/statistics & numerical data , Wheelchairs/standards
16.
Am J Nurs ; 118(11): 22-31, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30325746

ABSTRACT

: Purpose: Despite the evidence supporting safe patient handling and mobility (SPHM) practices, anecdotal evidence suggests that such practices are not universally taught in academic nursing programs. The primary goal of this cross-sectional descriptive study was to understand what nursing programs teach students about lifting, turning, transferring, repositioning, and mobilizing patients. METHODS: Faculty from baccalaureate and associate's degree nursing programs in the United States were invited via e-mail to complete a 64-item survey questionnaire, which was accessible through an online link. Participants were also invited to send documents related to SPHM course content to the research team. RESULTS: Faculty from 228 baccalaureate and associate's degree nursing programs completed the questionnaire. Most curricula included outdated manual techniques, taught reliance on body mechanics to reduce the risk of musculoskeletal injuries, and made use of nonergonomic aids such as draw sheets. Elements of SPHM in the curricula were less common, and nearly half of the respondents didn't know whether their affiliated clinical facilities had an SPHM program. CONCLUSIONS: The survey results suggest many possibilities for improvement-such as partnering with faculty in physical and occupational therapy departments, clinical partnering, and working with equipment vendors-to better incorporate evidence-based SPHM principles and practices into nursing curricula.


Subject(s)
Curriculum , Education, Nursing, Continuing/statistics & numerical data , Moving and Lifting Patients/methods , Nursing Staff, Hospital/education , Occupational Injuries/prevention & control , Safety Management/methods , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
17.
Mil Med ; 183(9-10): e494-e501, 2018 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29912463

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In recognition of the incidence of traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) in the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has, since 2007, examined returning U.S. service members for symptoms of TBI, a pre-condition for VA treatment of TBI. This study characterizes "Traumatic Brain Injury screen" service delivery, according to the barrier and facilitator viewpoints of those experiencing the delivery. METHODS: The purposeful sample comprised both Veteran patient and VA staff participants in the TBI screen program (n = 64), including patients (n = 14), health care providers (n = 38), and key informants (n = 12). Telephone interviews were conducted per standardized, semi-structured interview scripts; respondent narratives recorded and transcribed verbatim; natural emergence of key themes of discourse fostered through conventional content analysis; themes coded by meaning and meaning units organized by nature of influence on service delivery. RESULTS: A wide variety of structural, administrative, and communications barriers impede TBI screen service delivery, and certain case management and other functions promote delivery. CONCLUSIONS: The value of VA TBI screen service delivery is appreciated by its participants, but delivery is perceived as vulnerable to failure; the extent of such failure and short- and long-term effects on patient health and well-being outcomes is incompletely understood and merits investigation. Evaluating VA TBI screen service delivery under alternate modes of delivery, e.g., one-stop visits, expanded hours of delivery, shared appointment sessions, telehealth, and intensified case management is suggested.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic/diagnosis , Veterans/psychology , Adult , Afghan Campaign 2001- , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/complications , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/psychology , Disability Evaluation , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic/methods , Iraq War, 2003-2011 , Male , Qualitative Research , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organization & administration , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/statistics & numerical data , Veterans/statistics & numerical data
18.
Adm Policy Ment Health ; 45(6): 850-875, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29603055

ABSTRACT

Population-based post-deployment screening programs within the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs have been implemented to assess for mental health conditions and traumatic brain injury. The purpose of this paper is to systematically review the literature on post-deployment screening within this context and evaluate evidence compared to commonly accepted screening implementation criteria. Findings reflected highly variable psychometric properties of the various screens, variable treatment referral rates following screening, low to moderate treatment initiation rates following screening, and no information on treatment completion or long-term outcomes following screening. In sum, the evidence supporting population based post-deployment screening is inconclusive. Implications are discussed.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Military Personnel/psychology , Veterans/psychology , Alcoholism/diagnosis , Alcoholism/psychology , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/psychology , Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Humans , Mass Screening , Mental Disorders/psychology , Mental Health , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , United States
19.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 99(2S): S1-S3, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29406019

ABSTRACT

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) has been called the signature injury of the post-9/11 wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and neighboring countries. Although similarities exist between veterans and service members with TBI, levels of severity and different constellations of coexisting comorbid conditions affect them differently. These conditions affect physical, cognitive, and emotional function, which in turn can complicate community reintegration (CR), or the ability to return to family, vocational, and community life. This special supplement of the Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation consists of articles written by accomplished teams from multiple disciplines, including anthropology, neuropsychology, nursing, occupational therapy, psychology, and rehabilitation sciences. Each article brings a different perspective to bear on what CR means for veterans and service members from examination of predictors and perceptions of veterans and service members and others to measurement studies. Collectively, this group of articles represents current thinking about CR and lays the groundwork for testing interventions to improve CR outcomes for veterans and service members (eg, employment, living situation, family life).


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic/rehabilitation , Community Integration , Community Participation , Employment , Military Personnel , Veterans , War-Related Injuries/rehabilitation , Female , Gulf War , Humans , Iraq War, 2003-2011 , Male , Occupational Therapy , United States
20.
Am J Nurs ; 118(1): 58-61, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29280811

ABSTRACT

: This article is part of a series, Supporting Family Caregivers: No Longer Home Alone, published in collaboration with the AARP Public Policy Institute. Results of focus groups, conducted as part of the AARP Public Policy Institute's No Longer Home Alone video project, supported evidence that family caregivers aren't given the information they need to manage the complex care regimens of family members. This series of articles and accompanying videos aims to help nurses provide caregivers with the tools they need to manage their family member's health care at home.The articles in this new installment of the series explain principles for promoting safe mobility that nurses should reinforce with family caregivers. Each article also includes an informational tear sheet-Information for Family Caregivers-that contains links to instructional videos. To use this series, nurses should read the article first, so they understand how best to help family caregivers, and then encourage the caregivers to watch the videos and ask questions. For additional information, see Resources for Nurses.


Subject(s)
Accidental Falls/prevention & control , Caregivers , Humans , Mobility Limitation , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...