Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 32
Filter
1.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 11152, 2024 05 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38750058

ABSTRACT

Few studies have examined diabetes impact on total joint arthroplasty (TJA) outcomes, with variable findings. We investigated the association between diabetes and post-TJA physical function and pain, examining whether diabetes impact differs by sex and BMI. Patient sample completed questionnaires within 3 months prior to hip or knee TJA for osteoarthritis (OA) and 1-year post-surgery. Surgical 'non-response' was defined as < 30% improvement in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and physical function at 1-year. Two adjusted logistic regression models were estimated: (1) excluding, (2) including an interaction between diabetes, sex and BMI. The sample (626 hip, 754 knee) was 54.9% female, had mean BMI of 30.1, 13.0% reported diabetes. In adjusted models excluding an interaction, diabetes was not associated with non-response. However, a significant 3-way interaction (physical function: p = 0.003; pain: p = 0.006) between diabetes, sex, and BMI was found and was associated with non-response: non-response probability increased with increasing BMI in men with diabetes, but decreased with increasing BMI in women in diabetes. Findings suggest uncertainty in diabetes impact may be due to differential impacts by sex and BMI. A simple consideration of diabetes as present vs. absent may not be sufficient, with implications for the large TJA population.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Body Mass Index , Osteoarthritis, Hip , Osteoarthritis, Knee , Humans , Male , Female , Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery , Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis, Hip/surgery , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Aged , Middle Aged , Sex Factors , Diabetes Mellitus/physiopathology , Pain/etiology , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
PLoS One ; 19(4): e0302315, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38656990

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of diabetes on physical and mental health status, as well as patient satisfaction, one-year following knee and hip total joint arthroplasty (TJA) for osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: Participants were 626 hip and 754 knee TJA patients. Pre-surgery data were collected on socio-demographics and health status. The 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) was collected pre- and one year post-surgery, and physical (PCS) and mental component (MCS) summary scores computed. One-year patient satisfaction was also recorded. Four regression models tested the effect of diabetes on: 1) PCS change score; 2) MCS change score; 3) achieving minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) on PCS; and 4) patient satisfaction ('Somewhat or Very Satisfied' vs. 'Somewhat or Very Dissatisfied'). An interaction between surgical joint and diabetes was tested in each model. RESULTS: Self-reported diabetes prevalence was 13.0% (95% CI: 11.2%-14.7%) and was more common in knee 16.1% (95% CI: 13.4%-18.7%) than hip 9.3% (95% CI: 7.0%-11.5%) patients. In adjusted analyses, change scores were 2.3 units less on the PCS for those with diabetes compared to those without (p = 0.005). Patients with diabetes were about half as likely to achieve MCII as patients without diabetes (p = 0.004). Diabetes was not significantly associated with satisfaction or changes in MCS scores. Diabetes effects did not differ by surgical joint. CONCLUSIONS: Findings support that diabetes has a negative impact on improvements in physical health after TJA. Considering the growing prevalence of OA and diabetes in the population, our findings support the importance of perioperative screening and management of diabetes in patients undergoing TJA.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Diabetes Mellitus , Health Status , Mental Health , Patient Satisfaction , Humans , Male , Female , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Aged , Middle Aged , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/psychology , Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery , Osteoarthritis, Knee/psychology , Osteoarthritis, Hip/surgery
3.
PLoS One ; 19(3): e0299894, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38536837

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In osteoarthritis (OA) research, disability is largely studied within the context of activities of daily living. Broader consequences for social participation are often overlooked. In prior work, instrumental supports received and their perceived availability were shown to play a role in the maintenance of social participation. Two indicators of social participation were identified, diversity and intensity. The current study extends the findings from this prior cross-sectional work by examining these relationships longitudinally. METHODS: Data are from the baseline and 3-year follow-up questionnaires of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging, a population-based study of people ages 45-85 years at baseline. The sample was restricted to those who at baseline reported a doctor diagnosis of OA (n = 4104). Using structural equation modeling, latent variables were derived at each time point for activity limitations, instrumental supports perceived and received, and social participation diversity and intensity. Longitudinal factorial invariance was assessed. Model covariates included age, sex, education, income, marital status, smoking status, obesity, and number of chronic conditions. RESULTS: For all latent variables, strong factorial longitudinal invariance was found. Activity limitations increased over time. Greater baseline social participation intensity was associated with increases in later intensity and diversity. Increasing activity limitations were associated with decreases in social participation and with increasing receipt of instrumental supports; they were not associated with changes in perceived availability of supports. However, increasing perceived availability was positively associated with social participation intensity. CONCLUSIONS: With a goal of increasing social participation, findings suggest a focus on interventions to reduce activity limitations in OA is necessary. Findings additionally highlight an important role for perceived availability of instrumental supports in maintaining or improving social participation in OA, in addition to current social participation, particularly intensity, for future social participation status.


Subject(s)
Osteoarthritis , Social Participation , Humans , Activities of Daily Living , Longitudinal Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Canada/epidemiology , Aging , Osteoarthritis/epidemiology
4.
J Health Serv Res Policy ; 29(2): 92-99, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38099445

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The characterization and influence of preoperative health care use on quality-of-care indicators (e.g., readmissions) has received limited attention in populations with musculoskeletal disorders. The purpose of this study was to characterize preoperative health care use and examine its effect on quality-of-care indicators among patients undergoing elective surgery for osteoarthritis. METHODS: Data on health care use for 124,750 patients with elective surgery for osteoarthritis in Ontario, Canada, from April 1, 2015 to March 31, 2018 were linked across health administrative databases. Using total health care use one-year previous to surgery, patients were grouped from low to very high users. We used Poisson regression models to estimate rate ratios, while examining the relationship between preoperative health care use and quality-of-care indicators (e.g., extended length of stay, complications, and 90-day hospital readmissions). We controlled for covariates (age, sex, neighborhood income, rural/urban residence, comorbidities, and surgical anatomical site). RESULTS: We found a statistically significant trend of increasing worse outcomes by health care use gradients that persisted after controlling for patient demographics and comorbidities. Findings were consistent across surgical anatomical sites. Moreover, very high users have relatively large numbers of visits to non-musculoskeletal specialists. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight that information on patients' preoperative health care use, together with other risk factors (such as comorbidities), could help decision-making when benchmarking or reimbursing hospitals caring for complex patients undergoing surgery for osteoarthritis.


Subject(s)
Osteoarthritis , Postoperative Complications , Humans , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Cohort Studies , Ontario/epidemiology , Elective Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Osteoarthritis/epidemiology , Osteoarthritis/surgery , Osteoarthritis/etiology , Delivery of Health Care
5.
BMJ Open ; 13(11): e074423, 2023 11 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37963700

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Increased use of opioids and their associated harms have raised concerns around prescription opioid use for pain management following surgery. We examined trends and patterns of opioid prescribing following elective orthopaedic surgery. DESIGN: Population-based study. SETTING: Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Ontario residents aged 66+ years who had elective orthopaedic surgery from April 2004 to March 2018. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative opioid use (short term: within 90 days of surgery, prolonged: within 180 days and chronic: within 1 year), specific opioids prescribed, average duration (days) and amount (morphine milligram equivalents) of the initial prescription by year of surgery. RESULTS: We included 464 460 elective orthopaedic surgeries in 2004/2005-2017/2018: 80% of patients used opioids within 1 year of surgery-25.1% were chronic users. There was an 8% increase in opioid use within 1 year of surgery, from 75.1% in 2004/2005 to 80.9% in 2017/2018: a 29% increase in short-term use and a decline in prolonged (9%) and chronic (22%) use. After 2014/2015, prescribed opioid amounts initially declined sharply, while the duration of the initial prescription increased substantially. Across categories of use, there was a steady decline in coprescription of benzodiazepines and opioids. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients filled opioid prescriptions after surgery, and many continued filling prescriptions after 3 months. During a period of general increase in awareness of opioid harms and dissemination of guidelines/policies aimed at opioid prescribing for chronic pain, we found changes in prescribing practices following elective orthopaedic surgery. Findings illustrate the potential impact of guidelines/policies on shaping prescription patterns in the surgical population, even in the absence of specific guidelines for surgical prescribing.


Subject(s)
Opioid-Related Disorders , Orthopedic Procedures , Humans , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Ontario , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Drug Prescriptions , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy
6.
Osteoarthr Cartil Open ; 5(4): 100397, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37609061

ABSTRACT

Purpose: In OA studies, the focus often is on an index-joint; other affected joint sites are often overlooked. In this thumb-base OA study, we documented the frequency of symptomatic non-hand joint sites and investigated whether their count was associated with thumb-specific functional and patient-reported outcome measures. Design: Patients seeking care for thumb-base OA (conservative or surgical) were included. A patient-completed questionnaire captured sociodemographic and health characteristics, symptomatic hand and non-hand joint sites, and outcome measures (thumb-base pain intensity, symptoms and disability (TASD) and upper-extremity disability/symptoms (quickDASH)). Grip and pinch strength were measured. Linear regressions examined the association between each outcome and symptomatic joint site count, adjusted for several covariates. Results: The mean age of the 145 patients was 62 years, 72% were female. Mean symptomatic non-hand joint site count was 3.6. Ten percent reported only their hands as symptomatic; 30% reported 2-3 other symptomatic sites, and 49% reported 4+. From cross-sectional multivariable analyses, a higher symptomatic non-hand joint site count was associated with worse scores for all patient-reported outcomes and grip strength. Every unit increase in joint site count (49% had a 4+ count) was associated with a 2.1-3.3 unit increase (worse) in patient-reported outcome scores (all p â€‹< â€‹0.02). Conclusions: In this sample, nearly 80% of patients had 2+ symptomatic non-hand joint sites. These symptoms were associated with worse thumb- and hand-specific outcomes, suggesting a need for awareness of whole body OA burden, with implications for outcome score interpretations, study designs, and provision of care in thumb-base OA.

7.
Spine J ; 23(9): 1323-1333, 2023 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37160168

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: There is significant variability in minimal clinically important difference (MCID) criteria for lumbar spine surgery that suggests population and primary pathology specific thresholds may be required to help determine surgical success when using patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to estimate MCID thresholds for 3 commonly used PROMs after surgical intervention for each of 4 common lumbar spine pathologies. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Observational longitudinal study of patients from the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) national registry. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients undergoing surgery from 2015 to 2018 for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS; n = 856), degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS; n = 591), disc herniation (DH; n = 520) or degenerative disc disease (DDD n = 185) were included. OUTCOME MEASURES: PROMs were collected presurgery and 1-year postsurgery: the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and back and leg Numeric Pain Rating Scales (NPRS). At 1-year, patients reported whether they were 'Much better'/'Better'/'Same'/'Worse'/'Much worse' compared to before their surgery. Responses to this item were used as the anchor in analyses to determine surgical MCIDs for benefit ('Much better'/'Better') and substantial benefit ('Much better'). METHODS: MCIDs for absolute and percentage change for each of the 3 PROMs were estimated using a receiving operating curve (ROC) approach, with maximization of Youden's index as primary criterion. Area under the curve (AUC) estimates, sensitivity, specificity and correct classification rates were determined. All analyses were conducted separately by pathology group. RESULTS: MCIDs for ODI change ranged from -10.0 (DDD) to -16.9 (DH) for benefit, and -13.8 (LSS) to -22.0 (DS,DH) for substantial benefit. MCID for back and leg NPRS change were -2 to -3 for each group for benefit and -4.0 for substantial benefit for all groups on back NPRS. MCID estimates for percentage change varied by PROM and pathology group, ranging from -11.1% (ODI for DDD) to -50.0% (leg NPRS for DH) for benefit and from -40.0% (ODI for DDD) to -66.6% (leg NPRS for DH) for substantial benefit. Correct classification rates for all MCID thresholds ranged from 71% to 89% and were relatively lower for absolute vs percent change for those with high or low presurgical scores. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the use of generic MCID thresholds across pathologies in lumbar spine surgery is not recommended. For patients with relatively low or high presurgery PROM scores, MCIDs based on percentage change, rather than absolute change, appear generally preferable. These findings have applicability in clinical and research settings, and are important for future surgical prognostic work.


Subject(s)
Lumbar Vertebrae , Minimal Clinically Important Difference , Humans , Canada , Longitudinal Studies , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Registries , Treatment Outcome
8.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) ; 75(4): 893-901, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34825501

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate a profile of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors by sex among individuals with and without osteoarthritis (OA) and to consider single-site and multisite joint OA. METHODS: Data were sourced from Cycle 1, Comprehensive Cohort, Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging, a national sample of individuals ages 45 to 85 years. Systemic inflammatory/metabolic CVD risk factors collected were high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) level, high-density lipoprotein, triglycerides, total cholesterol, body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure, and hemoglobin A1c. Smoking history was also collected. Respondents indicated doctor-diagnosed OA in the knees, hips, and/or hands and were characterized as yes/no OA and single site/multisite OA. Individuals with OA were age- and sex-matched to non-OA controls. Covariates were age, sex, education, income, physical activity, timed up and go test findings, and comorbidities. A latent CVD risk variable was derived in women and men; standardized scores were categorized as follows: lowest, mid-low, mid-high, and highest risk. Associations with OA were quantified using ordinal logistic regressions. RESULTS: A total of 6,098 respondents (3,049 with OA) had a median age of 63 years, and 55.8% were women. One-third of OA respondents were in the highest risk category versus one-fifth of non-OA respondents. Apart from BMI (the largest contributor in both sexes), hsCRP level (an inflammation marker) was predominant in women, and metabolic factors and smoking were predominant in men. Overall, OA was associated with worse CVD risk quartiles compared with non-OA. OA was increasingly associated with worse CVD risk quartiles with increasing risk thresholds among women with multisite OA, but not men. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest unique CVD risks by sex/multisite subgroups and point to a potentially important role for inflammation in OA over and above traditional CVD risk factors.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Osteoarthritis , Male , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Longitudinal Studies , Risk Factors , C-Reactive Protein , Postural Balance , Canada/epidemiology , Time and Motion Studies , Osteoarthritis/diagnosis , Osteoarthritis/epidemiology , Osteoarthritis/complications , Aging , Heart Disease Risk Factors , Inflammation/complications
9.
J Rheumatol ; 49(7): 740-747, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35365584

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the magnitude and costs of ambulatory primary care, specialist physician care, and hospital service use for musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) in Canada's largest province, Ontario. METHODS: Administrative health databases were analyzed for fiscal year 2013-2014 for adults aged ≥ 18 years, including data on physician services, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospitalizations. International Classification of Diseases diagnostic codes were used to identify MSD services. A validated algorithm was used to estimate direct medical costs. Person-visit rates and numbers of persons and visits were tabulated by care setting, age, sex, and physician specialty. Data were examined for all MSDs combined, as well as for specific diagnostic groupings. RESULTS: Overall, 3.1 million adult Ontarians (28.5%) made over 8 million outpatient physician visits associated with MSDs. These included 5.6 million primary care visits. MSDs accounted for 560,000 (12.3%) of all adult ED visits. Total costs for MSD-related care were $1.6 billion, with 12.6% of costs attributed to primary care, 9.2% to specialist care, 8.6% to ED care, 8.5% to day surgery, and 61.2% associated with inpatient hospitalizations. Costs due to arthritis accounted for 40% of total MSD care costs ($639 million). MSD-related imaging costs were $169 million, yielding a total cost estimate of $1.8 billion for MSDs overall. CONCLUSION: MSDs place a significant and costly burden on the healthcare system. Health system planning needs to consider the large and escalating demand for care to reduce both the individual and population burden.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care , Musculoskeletal Diseases , Adult , Ambulatory Care , Emergency Service, Hospital , Health Care Costs , Hospitalization , Humans , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Musculoskeletal Diseases/therapy , Ontario/epidemiology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care
10.
PLoS One ; 16(8): e0256741, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34437639

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Diversion of prescription opioid medication is a contributor to the opioid epidemic. Safe handling practices can reduce the risk of diversion. We aimed to understand: 1) if orthopaedic patients received instructions on how to safely handle opioids, 2) their typical storage/disposal practices, and 3) their willingness to participate in an opioid disposal program (ODP). METHODS: Cross-sectional study of adult orthopaedic patients who completed an anonymous survey on current or past prescription opioid use, instruction on handling, storage and disposal practices, presence of children in the household, and willingness to participate in an ODP. Frequencies and percentages of responses were computed, both overall and stratified by possession of unused opioids. RESULTS: 569 respondents who reported either current or past prescription opioid use were analyzed. 44% reported receiving storage instructions and 56% reported receiving disposal instructions from a health care provider. Many respondents indicated unsafe handling practices: possessing unused opioids (34%), using unsafe storage methods (90%), and using unsafe disposal methods (34%). Respondents with unused opioids were less likely to report receiving handling instructions or using safe handling methods, and 47% of this group reported having minors or young adults in the household. Respondents who received storage and disposal instructions were more likely to report safe storage and disposal methods. Seventy-four percent of respondents reported that they would participate in an ODP. CONCLUSION: While many orthopaedic patients report inadequate education on safe opioid handling and using unsafe handling practices, findings suggest targeted education is associated with better behaviours. However, patients are willing to safely dispose of unused medication if provided a convenient option. These findings suggest a need to address patient knowledge and behavior regarding opioid handling to reduce the risk of opioid diversion.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Opioid Epidemic/prevention & control , Opioid-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Drug Prescriptions , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Opioid-Related Disorders/prevention & control , Orthopedics/standards , Pain, Postoperative/complications , Pain, Postoperative/pathology , Prescription Drug Diversion , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
11.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) ; 73(11): 1638-1647, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32598513

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The focus on disability in osteoarthritis (OA) has largely been on the ability to perform specific activities, which neglects the greater implications for social participation. We investigated the association between OA and social participation, considering activity limitations and instrumental supports as intervening variables in the association. METHODS: Data were from 21,214 respondents, ages 45-85 years, from cycle 1 of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. The questionnaire elicited information regarding self-reported doctor-diagnosed OA, difficulty with 14 activities, perceived availability and receipt of instrumental supports, and 17 social participation activities. Structural equation modeling was used. The primary outcome was social participation, and the primary predictor was OA. The intervening variables included activity limitations, received instrumental supports, and perceived instrumental supports. Latent variables were developed for intervening and social participation variables. The covariates included age, sex, body mass index, income, education, smoking, and comorbidity count. RESULTS: The mean age of the respondents was 63 years, 51% were female, and 26.5% reported having OA. Two distinct social participation indicators were identified, including social participation-diversity and social participation-intensity. When intervening variables were not considered, minimal/no association was found between OA and social participation. When intervening variables were considered, unique pathways linking OA and social participation were found. The overall negative association between activity limitations and social participation was partially direct and partially buffered by both receipt of and perceived availability of instrumental supports. In the absence of activity limitations, OA was associated with greater social participation. CONCLUSION: Enhanced social participation in people with OA who do not have activity limitations may reflect proactive steps taken by those with mild OA to maintain activity and social engagement. For those with activity limitations, findings highlight the need for interventions to mitigate limitations and draw particular attention to the importance of both provision and awareness of available instrumental supports in maintaining social participation.


Subject(s)
Aging , Cost of Illness , Osteoarthritis/psychology , Social Participation , Activities of Daily Living , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Canada/epidemiology , Disability Evaluation , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Mobility Limitation , Osteoarthritis/diagnosis , Osteoarthritis/epidemiology , Osteoarthritis/physiopathology , Severity of Illness Index , Surveys and Questionnaires
12.
Spine J ; 21(1): 80-89, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32805432

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: In the lumbar spine osteoarthritis (LS-OA) population having surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) symptoms, a significant proportion of patients experience limited benefit following the intervention. Thus, identifying contributing factors to this is important. Individuals with OA often have multiple joint symptoms, yet this has received limited attention in this population. PURPOSE: Document the occurrence of joint symptoms among patients undergoing surgery for LS-OA, and investigate the influence of these symptoms on disability postsurgery. DESIGN: Prospective study of consecutive patients followed to 12-month postsurgery. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients undergoing surgery (decompression surgery, with or without fusion) for neurogenic claudication with or without back pain due to LSS with a primary pathology diagnosis of LS-OA. OUTCOMES MEASURES: Patient self-reported: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), completed pre- and 12-month postsurgery; and, completed presurgery, age, sex, education, smoking, comorbid conditions, opioid use, short/long-term disability, depression and anxiety symptoms, back and leg pain intensity, presence of spondylolisthesis, procedure, prior spine surgery, and joints with arthritis and "pain/stiffness/swelling most days of the month" indicated on a homunculus (a joint site count was derived). ASSESSMENTS: Height and weight, used to calculate body mass index; timed-up-and-go performance-based test. METHODS: Outcome of interest was achieving a clinically important improvement (CII) in ODI by 12-month postsurgery (yes/no). The association between joint site count and achieving a CII was examined by multivariable logistic regression analyses, adjusted for other measures. RESULTS: In all, 165 patients were included. The mean age was 67 years (range: 44-90) and 47% were female. Seventy-seven percent reported 1+ joint site other than the back, 62% reported 2+, and 25% reported 4+. Among those achieving a CII, 21% had 4+ joint sites, compared with 31% among those not achieving a CII. Adjusted analyses: Increasing joint site count was associated with increasing risk (odds ratio [OR]: 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05, 1.66) of not achieving a CII; for those with 4+ joints, adjusted probability of not achieving a CII exceeded 50%. Also associated with an increased risk of not achieving a CII was presurgery anxiety (OR: 2.97, 95% CI: 1.02, 8.65), opioid use (OR: 2.89, 95% CI: 1.07, 7.82), and worse back pain intensity score (OR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.53). CONCLUSIONS: Multijoint involvement was highly prevalent in this LS-OA surgical sample. Its association with poorer postsurgery outcome supports a comprehensive approach to OA management and care. Knowledge of multijoint symptoms should inform patient education, shared decision-making, and recommendations for postsurgical rehabilitation and self-management strategies.


Subject(s)
Osteoarthritis, Spine , Spinal Stenosis , Aged , Decompression, Surgical , Female , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Prospective Studies , Spinal Stenosis/surgery , Treatment Outcome
13.
N Am Spine Soc J ; 8: 100092, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35141656

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of disability globally. Risk-stratification systems (e.g. STarT Back) have been proposed to guide treatment, but with varying success. We investigated factors associated with poor response to standardized LBP education and self-management recommendations stratified by dominant pain location (back or leg). METHODS: LBP patients underwent a standardized primary care model of care of education and self-management recommendations. Poor response was defined as an Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) change score <10 units by 6 months. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify poor response risk factors, stratified by back-dominant and leg-dominant back pain. Baseline factors: age, sex, body mass index, ODI, LBP/leg-pain intensity, LBP/leg-pain duration, STarT Back chronicity-risk, smoking, comorbidity count, and self-efficacy. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 767 patients (443 back-dominant, 324 leg-dominant). Mean age was 53 years, and 59% were female. Females accounted for 66% of back-dominant and 50% of leg-dominant patients. Chronicity risk was 'high' for 18% of back-dominant and 29% of leg-dominant patients. Poor response was higher in back- (57%) compared to leg-dominant (42%) patients. Adjusted stratified analyses: female sex, moderate or high chronicity-risk, and increasing age were associated with increased risk of poor response, and greater self-efficacy with favourable response, in leg-dominant patients; these were not the cases among back-dominant patients. Increased comorbidity count was associated with poor response in back dominant patients. In both patient groups, higher baseline ODI score was associated with favorable response, and smoking and longer pain duration with poor response. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in the influence of sex and chronicity risk in particular on outcome by dominant pain location suggests that considering these patients as a single group may not be appropriate. Furthermore, findings suggest that stratification by pain dominance may enhance the use of established risk stratification tools such as the STarT Back.

14.
PLoS One ; 15(7): e0236865, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32730319

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is currently no standardized method for measuring functional status in knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients, despite that it is one of the top priorities when determining eligibility for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of the current investigation was to identify factors associated with discordance between individual self-report and performance-based measures of function for obese and non-obese men and women with knee OA. METHODS: In a cohort of 727 knee OA patients scheduled for TKA, physical function prior to surgery was assessed with the self-reported physical function subscale of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC-pf), and the performance-based Timed Up and Go (TUG). Data on sociodemographic characteristics, health status, knee pain intensity, symptomatic joint site count, and pain catastrophizing were collected via questionnaire. The primary outcome was the difference in rescaled score between a participant's self-report and performance-based measures of function. Multivariable linear regression stratified by sex and obesity status was used to identify factors associated with discordance. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 65.5 years and 55% were women. With younger age, self-reported scores indicated increasingly worse function compared to performance-based scores, regardless of sex or obesity status. Among non-obese individuals, greater knee pain intensity was associated with a participant's self-report score indicating increasingly worse function compared to their performance-based score. For obese women, pain catastrophizing, and number of symptomatic joints were also associated with discordance as was reporting fewer comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Physical function may be differentially represented by self-reported and performance-based measures depending on a variety of patient factors. Our findings add to the evidence which suggests both measures should be used when assessing functional status prior to TKA.


Subject(s)
Obesity/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis, Knee/psychology , Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Physical Functional Performance , Quality of Life , Self Report , Activities of Daily Living , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Case-Control Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Knee/pathology , Pain Measurement , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Recovery of Function , Severity of Illness Index , Sex Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
15.
ACR Open Rheumatol ; 2(3): 174-179, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32114717

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The vast majority of published estimates of osteoarthritis (OA) burden are based on an OA diagnosis. These data are limited, as individuals often do not visit a physician until their symptoms are moderate to severe. This study compared individuals with an OA diagnosis to those with OA joint symptoms but without a diagnosis considering a number of sociodemographic and health characteristics. A further distinction was made between individuals with symptoms in one joint site and those with symptoms in multiple joint sites. METHODS: Data are from 23 186 respondents aged 45 to 85 years from the first cycle of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. A multinomial logistic regression model examined the relationship between sociodemographic- and health-related characteristics and OA status (diagnosed OA, joint symptoms without OA, no OA or joint symptoms). In addition, logistic regression models assessed the relationship between OA status and usually experiencing pain and having some degree of functional limitation. RESULTS: Twenty-one percent of respondents reported a diagnosis of OA, and 25% reported symptoms typical of OA but without an OA diagnosis. Other than being slightly younger, the characteristic profile of individuals with symptoms in two or more joint sites was indistinguishable from that of those with diagnosed OA. CONCLUSION: It may be warranted to consider OA-like multiple joint symptoms when deriving estimates of OA-attributed population health and cost burden.

16.
Spine J ; 20(6): 874-881, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32007652

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: An important step in improving spinal care is understanding how current health-care resources and associated cost are being utilized and distributed across a health-care system. PURPOSE: Our objective was to examine the magnitude and distribution of direct health care costs for spinal conditions across physician type and hospital setting. DESIGN/SETTING: Cross-sectional analysis of administrative health data for the fiscal year 2013-2014 from the province of Ontario, Canada. PATIENT SAMPLE: Adult population aged 18+ years (N=10,841,302). OUTCOME MEASURES: Person visit rates and total number of people and visits by specific care settings were calculated for all spinal conditions as well as stratified by nontrauma and trauma-related conditions. Variation in rates by age and sex was examined. The proportion of patients seeing physicians of different specialties was calculated for each condition grouping. Direct medical costs were estimated and their percentage distribution by care setting calculated for nontrauma and trauma-related conditions. Additionally, costs for spinal imaging overall and stratified by type of scan were determined. METHODS: Administrative health databases were analyzed, including data on physician services, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations. ICD-9 and -10 diagnostic codes were used to identify nontraumatic (degenerative or inflammatory) and traumatic spinal disorders. A validated algorithm was used to estimate direct medical costs. RESULTS: Overall, 822,000 adult Ontarians (7.6%) made 1.6 million outpatient physician visits for spinal conditions; the majority (1.1 million) of these visits were for nontrauma conditions. Approximately, 86% of outpatient visits were in primary care. Emergency Department (ED) visits for nontrauma spinal conditions (130,000 out of 156,000 ED visits) accounted for 2.8% of all ED visits in the province. Total costs for spine-related care were $264 million (CDN) with 64% of costs due to nontrauma conditions. For these nontrauma conditions, ED visits cost $28 million for 130,000 visits ($215 per visit). For $32 million spent in primary care, 890,000 visits were made ($36 per visit). Spine imaging costs were $66.5 million, yielding a combined total of $330 million in health care spending for spinal conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal conditions place a large and costly burden on the health-care system. The disproportionate annual cost associated with ED visits represents a potential opportunity to redirect costs to fund more clinically and cost-effective models of care for nontraumatic spinal conditions.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital , Health Care Costs , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Delivery of Health Care , Humans , Ontario/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies
17.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) ; 72(8): 1074-1080, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31199582

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The influence of sex on post-total knee arthroplasty (TKA) outcomes has been variable in the literature. Though sex is often reported as an averaged effect, we undertook this study to investigate whether sex modified the influence of presurgery characteristics on post-TKA knee pain. METHODS: This was a prospective study with data derived from 477 TKA osteoarthritis patients (279 women, 198 men). Questionnaires were completed presurgery and at 3 months postsurgery. The association between 3-month post-TKA knee pain and presurgery covariates (body mass index, comorbidity count, symptomatic joint count, low back pain, knee pain, and depressive symptoms) was assessed by linear regression. Sex-specific effects were evaluated using interactions. RESULTS: Women had significantly worse presurgery knee pain, joint count, and depressive symptoms, and worse postsurgery knee pain, than men. With simple covariate adjustment, no sex effect on pain was found. However, sex was found to moderate the effects of comorbidities (worse for women [P = 0.013]), presence of low back pain (worse for men [P = 0.003]), and depressive symptoms (worse for men [P < 0.001]) on postsurgery pain. Worse presurgery pain was associated with worse postsurgery pain similarly for women and men. CONCLUSION: The influence of some patient factors on early post-TKA pain cannot be assumed to be the same for women and men; average effects may mask underlying associations. Results suggest a need to consider sex differences in understanding TKA outcomes, which may have important implications for prognostic tool development in TKA.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/psychology , Depression/complications , Low Back Pain/psychology , Osteoarthritis, Knee/psychology , Pain, Postoperative/psychology , Sex Factors , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery , Pain Measurement , Preoperative Period , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
18.
ACR Open Rheumatol ; 1(4): 203-212, 2019 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31777796

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine patterns of depressive symptoms before and over the year following osteoarthritis (OA) surgery, stratified by joint and postsurgical outcome. METHODS: Participants were hip (n = 287), knee (n = 360), and lumbar spine (n = 100) OA patients scheduled for joint replacement or decompression surgery with or without fusion. One pre- and 4 postsurgery questionnaires were completed. Depressive symptoms were quantified using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). One-year outcomes were based on Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain scores for hip and knee patients and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores for spine patients and were categorized as "worse" (top score tertile) vs. "better" outcomes (first, second tertiles). Plots over time were generated by joint and outcome: 1) mean pain/disability and depression scores and 2) percentage of patients meeting HADS cut-off for depression "caseness," reporting depression diagnosis and treatment. RESULTS: There were notable decreases in depression scores for patients with better outcomes. For those with worse outcomes, decreases were smaller for hip patients and were not significant for knee and spine patients. Among those with poorer outcomes, 25% of spine and knee patients were depression "cases" pre- and postsurgery; an additional 16% of spine and 10% of knee patients developed new "caseness" postsurgery. The proportion of these patients deemed depression cases by score was much higher than the proportion reporting diagnosis/treatment. CONCLUSION: Although depressive symptoms decrease overall in OA patients postsurgery, degrees of change vary by joint and surgical outcome. Greater attention to mental health postsurgery is warranted and may lead to improved surgical outcomes, particularly among knee and spine patients.

19.
BMJ Open ; 9(7): e029613, 2019 07 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31345978

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate cohort effects in selected opioids use and determine whether cohort differences were associated with changes in risk factors for use over time. DESIGN: This study presents secondary analyses of a longitudinal survey panel of the general population that collected data biannually. SETTING: Data from the Canadian Longitudinal National Population Health Survey 1994-2011. POPULATION: This study included 12 542 participants from the following birth cohorts: post-World War I (born 1915-1924), pre-World War II (born 1925-1934), World War II (born 1935-1944), Older Baby Boom (born 1945-1954), Younger Baby Boom (born 1955-1964), Older Generation X (born 1965-1974) and Younger Generation X (born 1975-1984). MAIN OUTCOME: Responses to a single question asking about the use of codeine, morphine or meperidine in the past month (yes/no) were examined. RESULTS: Over and above age and period effects, there were significant cohort differences in selected opioids use: each succeeding recent cohort had greater use than their predecessors (eg, Gen Xers had greater use than younger baby boomers). Selected opioids use increased significantly from 1994 to 2002, plateauing between 2002 and 2006 and then declining until 2011. After accounting for cohort and period effects, there was a decline in use of these opioids with increasing age. Although pain was significantly associated with greater selected opioids use (OR=3.63, 95% CI 3.39 to 3.94), pain did not explain cohort differences. Cohort and period effects were no longer significant after adjusting for the number of chronic conditions. Cohort differences in selected opioids use mirrored cohort differences in multimorbidity. Use of these opioids was significantly associated with taking antidepressants or tranquillisers (OR=2.52, 95% CI 2.27 to 2.81 and OR=1.60, 95% CI 1.46 to 1.75, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The findings underscore the need to consider multimorbidity including possible psychological disorders and associated medications when prescribing opioids (codeine, morphine, meperidine), particularly for recent birth cohorts. Continued efforts to monitor prescription patterns and develop specific opioid use guidelines for multimorbidity appear warranted.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Codeine/therapeutic use , Meperidine/therapeutic use , Morphine/therapeutic use , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Canada/epidemiology , Child , Chronic Disease , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Multimorbidity , Pain/drug therapy , Pain/epidemiology , Pain Measurement/methods , Population Health , Risk Factors , Young Adult
20.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) ; 71(9): 1178-1185, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30629338

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate rates of prescription opioid use among patients with presurgical knee, hip, and spine osteoarthritis (OA) and associations between use and sociodemographic and health status characteristics. METHODS: Participants were patients with presurgical, end-stage OA of the knee (n = 77), hip (n = 459), and spine (n = 168). Data were collected on current use of opioids and other pain medications, as well as measures of sociodemographic and health status variables and depression and pain (0-10 numeric rating scale). Rates of opioid use were calculated by sex, age, and surgical site. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine associations between opioid use (sometimes/daily versus never) and other study variables. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 65.6 years; 55.5% were women, 15% of patients reported "sometimes" using opioids, and 15% reported "daily use." Use of opioids was highest among patients with spine OA (40%) and similar among patients with knee and hip OA (28% and 30%, respectively). Younger women (ages <65 years) reported the greatest use of opioids overall, particularly among patients with spine OA. From multivariable logistic regression, greater likelihood of opioid use was significantly associated with spine OA (versus knee OA), obesity, being a current or former smoker, higher symptomatic joint count, greater depressive symptoms, greater pain, and current use of other prescription pain medication. CONCLUSION: Nearly one-third of patients with presurgical OA used prescription opioid medication. Given the questionable efficacy of opioids in OA and risk of adverse effects, higher opioid use among younger individuals and those with depressive symptoms is of concern and warrants further investigation.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Orthopedic Procedures/methods , Osteoarthritis, Hip/drug therapy , Osteoarthritis, Knee/drug therapy , Spondylarthritis/drug therapy , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Hip/surgery , Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery , Pain Management/methods , Preoperative Care/methods , Preoperative Period , Prevalence , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Spondylarthritis/surgery , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...