Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Nutrients ; 12(7)2020 Jul 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32650524

ABSTRACT

Cognitive deficit has been reported in coeliac disease (CD), but previous reports often study heterogenous samples of patients at multiple stages of the disease, or lack control data. Healthy controls (N = 21), newly diagnosed CD patients (NCD; N = 19) and established CD patients (ECD; N = 35) were recruited from a specialist UK centre. Participants underwent a cognitive test battery that established seven overall domain scores. The SF-36 was administered as a quality of life (QoL) measure. Controlling for age, data were compared in between-group ANCOVAs with Tukey's post-hoc test. Any significant outcome was compared in the ECD group only, between patients who were gluten-free diet adherent vs. non-adherent (defined via Biagi score and serology results). NCD and ECD groups underperformed relative to controls, by comparable degrees, in visual (overall model: p < 0.001) and verbal (p = 0.046) memory. The ECD group only underperformed in visuoconstructive abilities (p = 0.050). Regarding QoL, the NCD group reported lower vitality (p = 0.030), while the ECD group reported more bodily pain (p = 0.009). Comparisons based on dietary adherence were non-significant. These findings confirm cognitive deficit in CD. Dysfunction appears established at the point of diagnosis, after which it (predominantly) stabilises. While a beneficial effect of dietary treatment is therefore implied, future research is needed to establish to what extent any further decline is due to gluten exposure.


Subject(s)
Celiac Disease/diet therapy , Cognitive Dysfunction/etiology , Diet, Gluten-Free , Patient Compliance , Adult , Celiac Disease/complications , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Quality of Life , Time Factors , Young Adult
2.
Aging Ment Health ; 23(12): 1605-1615, 2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30430858

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The objective of this review was to identify, appraise and synthesise qualitative research that explores the experience of the disclosure of a dementia diagnosis from the perspectives of clinicians, patients and carers. Method: A systematic search of four databases, grey literature and reference lists identified 13 studies, which met the required criteria to be included in the review. All were appraised using a quality appraisal tool. Data were extracted and synthesised using a meta-ethnographic approach. Results: Five key themes were developed from an interpretation of the results: the clinician's approach; how to tell people the diagnosis is dementia; the importance of the clinician offering hope; level of understanding; and who should attend the disclosure meeting. The process can be improved through a compassionate clinician offering hope, answers to patient and carer questions, and written and/or visual information to support understanding of the diagnosis. These features could be included in guidance to clinicians. There was a large amount of variance in the quality of the studies. Future qualitative research could focus on clinician compassion, giving hope, the management of dynamics within sessions, supporting information and follow-up sessions. Conclusion: Clinical practice can be informed by a body of literature but there is much work to be done to develop evidence-based detailed guidance for improving the dementia diagnosis experience for all parties, and supporting clinicians to manage inherent tensions in this process. Further research is required on this topic to addresses the shortcomings highlighted in this review.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Dementia/diagnosis , Disclosure , Professional-Patient Relations , Anthropology, Cultural/methods , Caregivers/psychology , Dementia/psychology , Empathy , Humans , Qualitative Research
3.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci ; 70(5): 682-90, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24700277

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Healthy aging is associated with a decline in visuospatial working memory. The nature of the changes leading to this decline in response of the eye and/or hand is still under debate. This study aims to establish whether impairments observed in performance on cognitive tasks are due to actual cognitive effects or are caused by motor-related eye-hand coordination. METHODS: We implemented a computerized version of the Corsi span task. The eye and touch responses of healthy young and older adults were recorded to a series of remembered targets on a screen. RESULTS: Results revealed differences in fixation strategies between the young and the old with increasing cognitive demand, which resulted in higher error rates in the older group. We observed increasing reaction times and durations between fixations and touches to targets, with increasing memory load and delays in both the eye and the hand in the older adults. DISCUSSION: Our results show that older adults have difficulty maintaining a "preparatory set" for durations longer than 5 s and with increases in memory load. Attentional differences cannot account for our results, and differences in age groups appear to be principally memory related. Older adults reveal poorer eye-hand coordination, which is further confounded by increasing delay and complexity.


Subject(s)
Aging/physiology , Cognition Disorders/physiopathology , Eye Movements/physiology , Hand/physiology , Memory, Short-Term/physiology , Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Spatial Memory/physiology , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...