Effect of single end-range and not end-range Maitland mobilization on pressure pain threshold and functional measures in knee osteoarthritis: randomised, controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Hyperalgesia is attributed to peripheral and central sensitization in knee osteoarthritis (OA). Pressure pain threshold (PPT) is a relevant method for evaluating pain sensitivity in knee OA. The effect of end-range and not end-range Maitland mobilization for certain time-period on pain sensitivity has not been investigated in knee OA. AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of end-range and not end-range Maitland mobilization compared to sham manual therapy technique on PPT and functional measures. DESIGN: Randomised, controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Outpatient setting. POPULATION: Sixty-six patients with mild-to-severe knee OA. METHODS: Twenty-one patients (N.=21) received end-range Maitland mobilization (EMGr), twenty patients (N.=20) received not end-range Maitland mobilization (nEMGr) and twenty-two patients (N.=22) received sham manual therapy technique (CG). All interventions were performed once. Evaluation was conducted pre-, postintervention and on the following consecutive second days within a 6-day period. Outcomes were local and distant PPT, Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) and strength of passive resistance of knee at onset of pain. RESULTS: Local and distant PPT increased, TUG time and strength of passive resistance decreased immediately, local and distant PPT remained decreased in 6-day and 4-day period, TUG time remained decreased in 6-day period in EMGr (all changes P≤0.017). Local PPT increased immediately compared to baseline in nEMGr. In between group comparison, increase of local, distant PPT and strength of passive resistance endures on 2nd day, 4th day and postintervention, respectively, in EMGr compared to CG. EMGr compared to nEMGr presented significant difference on 6th day and 4th day in local and distant PPT, respectively (all changes P≤0.021). NEMGr presented no significant difference compared to CG on either follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Single end-range Maitland mobilization is effective immediately and in 4-day period on pain sensitization and immediately on physical function compared to not end-range Maitland mobilization and sham manual therapy technique in knee OA. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Based on the present results, applying end-range Maitland mobilization is suggested on every second day to maintain alleviation of pain sensitization and increasing passive knee joint mobility effectively in knee OA.

End-range Maitland mobilization decreasing pain sensitivity in knee osteoarthritis: randomized, controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Pressure pain threshold (PPT) is a widely applied method for measuring the magnitude of increased peripheral and central pain sensitivity causing hyperalgesia in knee osteoarthritis (OA). Although manual therapy techniques effects positively PPT, the effect of end-range Maitland mobilization has not been evaluated in knee OA. AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of end-range Maitland mobilization compared to sham manual therapy technique on PPT and function-related measures. DESIGN: The design of the study was of a randomized, controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Outpatient setting. POPULATION: Forty women with moderate-to-severe knee OA. METHODS: Twenty patients (N.=20) were randomly assigned to Maitland group (MG) and twenty patients (N.=20) to control group (CG). Patients in MG received single end-range Maitland mobilization while patients in CG received sham manual therapy technique. Assessment was performed at baseline, 30 minutes and after 1-week period. Outcome measures were PPT locally at knee and distant at ipsilateral extensor carpi radialis longus muscle, general pain during the previous week using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) time associated with pain measured with Numerating Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and strength of passive resistance of knee at onset of pain. RESULTS: Despite all outcome measures improved significantly postintervention, no changes were detected after 1-week period compared to postintervention in MG. No change of outcome measures was found also postintervention and after 1-week period compared to postintervention in CG. All postintervention results showed significant improvement in between-group comparison in favor of MG. However, after 1-week period, only strength of passive resistance revealed significant difference in between-group comparison in favor of MG (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although end-range Maitland mobilization has an immediate effect on decreasing peripheral and central pain sensitivity and improving function-related measures in knee OA, these changes may not cause clinically relevant effect based on data measured after 1-week period. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Investigating the time-course of end-range Maitland mobilization for determining the optimal treatment frequency during rehabilitation is suggested in knee OA.

Overview of Registered Clinical Trials on Manual Therapy: Possible Implications of Genetic Testing for Personalized Treatment.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Manual therapy (MT) is a frequently applied intervention offering individualized treatment in the clinic. In addition to the traditional approaches of MT, measuring molecular response to MT may offer better understanding of MT outcomes in order to provide specific personalized treatment. The aim of this study was to summarize MT-related registered clinical trials, as well as to search for any evidence on MT and genetics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted within the Clinical Trials database with predefined keywords mining for all types of MT-related clinical trials. RESULTS: From the 47 trials, 20 had results and 27 had no results. MT alleviated pain and improved function almost in all trials. One registered clinical trial had investigated molecular outcomes of MT. CONCLUSION: MT is an effective and individualized treatment offering option in the management of several conditions. Interestingly, a clinical trial was found investigating molecular genetics and MT pinpointing an already existing link between genetics and MT. Therefore, further clinical trials may focus on genetics and MT for providing specific personalized treatment in future.

Clinical Effect of End-range Maitland Mobilization in the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis - A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Different manual therapy techniques and conservative therapy have been used separately for alleviation of pain and improvement of physical function in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). However, no study has reported the effect of combination of these treatment modalities in the management of KOA. Our aim was to test the feasibility of the study design and to compare the effect of end-range Maitland mobilization to conservative therapy in KOA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients (conservative therapy group: CG) received conservative therapy alone, fifteen patients (Maitland plus conservative therapy group: M+CG) received additionally end-range Maitland mobilization during the 3-week study period. Outcomes were pain intensity, measured with visual analogue scale (VAS) in general and during functional activities, passive range of motion (PROM) and peak muscle force during knee flexion and extension, Timed Up and Go test and 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT). RESULTS: All outcomes improved significantly in both groups. Magnitude of changes was significantly greater in M+CG compared to CG regarding all VAS pain scores, flexion PROM of both knees, right hamstring peak muscle force and 6MWT. CONCLUSION: With few modifications, this study design seems feasible for the comparison of end-range Maitland mobilization with conservative therapy in KOA. Moreover, end-range Maitland mobilization in addition to conservative therapy appeared more effective in relief of pain and improvement of functional status than conservative therapy alone in KOA.

Integrated prevention and management of non-communicable diseases, including musculoskeletal health: a systematic policy analysis among OECD countries.

INTRODUCTION: Development and implementation of appropriate health policy is essential to address the rising global burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs). The aim of this study was to evaluate existing health policies for integrated prevention/management of NCDs among Member States of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). We sought to describe policies' aims and strategies to achieve those aims, and evaluate extent of integration of musculoskeletal conditions as a leading cause of global morbidity. METHODS: Policies submitted by OECD Member States in response to a World Health Organization (WHO) NCD Capacity Survey were extracted from the WHO document clearing-house and analysed following a standard protocol. Policies were eligible for inclusion when they described an integrated approach to prevention/management of NCDs. Internal validity was evaluated using a standard instrument (sum score: 0-14; higher scores indicate better quality). Quantitative data were expressed as frequencies, while text data were content-analysed and meta-synthesised using standardised methods. RESULTS: After removal of duplicates and screening, 44 policies from 30 OECD Member States were included. Three key themes emerged to describe the general aims of included policies: system strengthening approaches; improved service delivery; and better population health. Whereas the policies of most countries covered cancer (83.3%), cardiovascular disease (76.6%), diabetes/endocrine disorders (76.6%), respiratory conditions (63.3%) and mental health conditions (63.3%), only half the countries included musculoskeletal health and pain (50.0%) as explicit foci. General strategies were outlined in 42 (95.5%) policies-all were relevant to musculoskeletal health in 12 policies, some relevant in 27 policies and none relevant in three policies. Three key themes described the strategies: general principles for people-centred NCD prevention/management; enhanced service delivery; and system strengthening approaches. Internal validity sum scores ranged from 0 to 13; mean: 7.6 (95% CI 6.5 to 8.7). CONCLUSION: Relative to other NCDs, musculoskeletal health did not feature as prominently, although many general prevention/management strategies were relevant to musculoskeletal health improvement.