Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Methods Mol Biol ; 497: 285-301, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19107425

ABSTRACT

We have previously demonstrated that Gam1, an avian adenoviral protein inhibits sumoylation. By counteracting the SUMO pathway, Gam1 has a significant impact on virus-infected cells, but in isolation the inhibitory effects of the Gam1 protein can be exploited to intentionally manipulate the SUMO system in vivo or in vitro. Here we discuss in detail the techniques we use to inhibit the SUMO pathway using the Gam1 protein.


Subject(s)
SUMO-1 Protein/antagonists & inhibitors , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Viral Proteins/pharmacology , Animals , Cells, Cultured , Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Humans , Protein Processing, Post-Translational/drug effects , Recombinant Proteins/isolation & purification , Recombinant Proteins/pharmacology , SUMO-1 Protein/metabolism , Viral Proteins/isolation & purification
2.
DNA Repair (Amst) ; 7(9): 1500-16, 2008 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18603484

ABSTRACT

Ultraviolet A (UVA) radiation represents more than 90% of the UV spectrum reaching Earth's surface. Exposure to UV light, especially the UVA part, induces the formation of photoexcited states of cellular photosensitizers with subsequent generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) leading to damages to membrane lipids, proteins and nucleic acids. Although UVA, unlike UVC and UVB, is poorly absorbed by DNA, it inhibits cell cycle progression, especially during S-phase. In the present study, we examined the role of the DNA damage checkpoint response in UVA-induced inhibition of DNA replication. We provide evidence that UVA delays S-phase in a dose dependent manner and that UVA-irradiated S-phase cells accumulate in G2/M. We show that upon UVA irradiation ATM-, ATR- and p38-dependent signalling pathways are activated, and that Chk1 phosphorylation is ATR/Hus1 dependent while Chk2 phosphorylation is ATM dependent. To assess for a role of these pathways in UVA-induced inhibition of DNA replication, we investigated (i) cell cycle progression of BrdU labelled S-phase cells by flow cytometry and (ii) incorporation of [methyl-(3)H]thymidine, as a marker of DNA replication, in ATM, ATR and p38 proficient and deficient cells. We demonstrate that none of these pathways is required to delay DNA replication in response to UVA, thus ruling out a role of the canonical S-phase checkpoint response in this process. On the contrary, scavenging of UVA-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) by the antioxidant N-acetyl-L-cystein or depletion of vitamins during UVA exposure significantly restores DNA synthesis. We propose that inhibition of DNA replication is due to impaired replication fork progression, rather as a consequence of UVA-induced oxidative damage to protein than to DNA.


Subject(s)
DNA Damage , Reactive Oxygen Species/pharmacology , S Phase/drug effects , Ultraviolet Rays , Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins , Cell Cycle/drug effects , Cell Cycle/radiation effects , Cell Cycle Proteins/metabolism , Cell Line, Transformed , DNA/biosynthesis , DNA Replication/drug effects , DNA Replication/radiation effects , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Humans , Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases/metabolism , Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases/metabolism , S Phase/radiation effects , Signal Transduction , Tumor Suppressor Proteins/metabolism , p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...