Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Audiol ; 29(3): 303-317, 2020 Sep 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32510971

ABSTRACT

Purpose Cannabis is widely used for medicinal and recreational purposes. Studies have evaluated its health benefits and consequences, although there is limited work on its effects on the auditory system. In this exploratory study, we evaluate the effects of cannabis smoking on early auditory evoked potentials. Method We investigated auditory brainstem response (ABR) and electrocochleography waveforms in 18 cannabis smokers (44% women, 54% men; M age = 23.06 years, range: 21-28 years) and 19 nonsmoker controls (63% women, 37% men; M age = 23.74 years, range: 21-33 years). Threshold ABRs were recorded using rarefaction clicks at a rate of 17.7/s from 80 dB nHL to Wave V threshold. Resulting amplitudes and latencies for Waves I, III, and V were compared via independent-samples t tests. Electrocochleograms obtained with 90 dB nHL (7.1/s) alternating clicks were assessed for summating and compound action potentials, which were compared between groups using independent-samples t tests. Results ABR Wave I amplitudes were significantly lower in smokers (M = 0.14 µV, SD = 0.11) compared to nonsmokers (M = 0.21 µV, SD = 0.10, p = .039) at 80 dB nHL. Wave V latencies were significantly delayed in smokers at 80 dB nHL. Wave I and III latencies did not differ significantly between the two groups. Summating potential/compound action potential ratios were significantly elevated in smokers (M = 0.30, SD = 0.04) versus nonsmokers (M = 0.21, SD = 0.05, p = .042). Conclusion We identified significant differences in electrophysiological outcomes between cannabis smokers and nonsmokers. Cannabis smoking may have a subtle neurotoxic effect on the auditory system. Larger confirmatory studies are warranted.


Subject(s)
Audiometry, Evoked Response , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/physiology , Marijuana Smoking/physiopathology , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Evoked Potentials, Auditory/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Young Adult
2.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 143(3): 1603, 2018 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29604718

ABSTRACT

Auditory filterbanks are an integral part of many metrics designed to predict speech intelligibility and speech quality. Considerations in these applications include accurate reproduction of auditory filter shapes, the ability to reproduce the impact of hearing loss as well as normal hearing, and computational efficiency. This paper presents an alternative method for implementing a dynamic compressive gammachirp (dcGC) auditory filterbank [Irino and Patterson (2006). IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Proc. 14, 2222-2232]. Instead of using a cascade of second-order sections, this approach uses digital frequency warping to give the gammawarp filterbank. The set of warped finite impulse response filter coefficients is constrained to be symmetrical, which results in the same phase response for all filters in the filterbank. The identical phase responses allow the dynamic variation in the gammachirp filter magnitude response to be realized as a sum, using time-varying weights, of three filters that provide the responses for high-, mid-, and low-intensity input signals, respectively. The gammawarp filterbank offers a substantial improvement in execution speed compared to previous dcGC implementations; for a dcGC filterbank, the gammawarp implementation is 24 to 38 times faster than the dcGC Matlab code of Irino.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...