Extremes of body mass index and postoperative complications after esophagectomy.

Obesity has been variously associated with reduced or similar rates of postoperative complications compared to normal weight patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer. In contrast, little is known about esophagectomy risks in the underweight population. The relationship between the extremes of body mass index (BMI) and postoperative complications after esophagectomy was evaluated. Consecutive esophagectomy patients (2000-2013) were reviewed. The patients were stratified based on BMI at the time of diagnosis: underweight (<18.5), normal (18.5-24.9), overweight (25-29.9), obese I (30-34.9), and obese II or III (≥35). Hospital length of stay as well as postoperative complications and their accordion severity grading were evaluated according to the BMI category. Of 388 patients, 78.6% were male with a median age of 62 years at the time of operation. Pathologic cancer stage was 0 to I in 53%. BMI distribution was as follows: 5.6% underweight, 28.7% normal, 31.4% overweight, 22.8% obese I, and 11.5% obese II or III. Performance status was 0 or 1 in 99.2%. Compared to normal BMI patients, underweight patients had increased pulmonary complications (odds ratio (OR) 3.32, P = 0.014) and increased other postoperative complications (OR 3.00, P = 0.043). Patients who were overweight did not have increased complications compared to normal BMI patients. BMI groups did not differ in mortality rates or complication accordion severity grading. Hospital length of stay trended toward a longer duration in the underweight population (P = 0.06). Underweight patients are at increased risk for postoperative pulmonary and other complications. Underweight patients may benefit from preoperative nutritional repletion and mitigation for sarcopenia. Aggressive postoperative pulmonary care may help reduce complications in these patients. In contrast, the operative risk in overweight and obese patients is similar to normal BMI patients.

Assessment of a scoring system for predicting complications after esophagectomy.

Complications occur frequently after esophagectomy. Identifying the risk of complications preoperatively may help in patient selection and postoperative management. We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent esophagectomy between 1980 and 2009. A previously reported scoring system was used to estimate risk, and its ability to predict complications was assessed. A total of 514 patients (382 men; 74%) with a mean age of 59.0 ± 12.5 years underwent esophagectomy for cancer (398; 77%) or benign disease. Minor complications occurred in 224 patients (44%) and severe complications occurred in 134 patients (26%). The calculated risk score was based on weighted values for age, coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, type of operation, and forced expiratory volume in the first second expressed as a percent of predicted (FEV1%). Increasing risk score was associated with a linear increase in the incidence of complications (P < 0.001 for either severe complications or any complications). The scoring system predicted severe complications with an accuracy of 65.3% (P < 0.001). Score groups identified an incremental risk of severe complications (0 to 6 = 12%; 7 to 13 = 18%; 14 to 20 = 28%; 21 to 27 = 36%; >27 = 52%; P < 0.001). Complications are frequent after esophagectomy and can be predicted using a previously reported scoring system. This scoring system may assist in patient selection for esophagectomy and in providing appropriate resources for postoperative management of higher risk patients.

E2F is required to prevent inappropriate S-phase entry of mammalian cells.

E2F is a family of transcription factors that regulates the cell cycle. It is widely accepted that E2F-mediated transactivation of a set of genes is the critical activity that governs cellular progression through G(1) into S phase. In contrast to this hypothesis, we demonstrate that E2F actually suppresses the onset of S phase in two cell types when the cells are arrested by gamma irradiation. Our findings indicate that in these cells, the critical event triggering progression from G(0)/G(1) arrest into S phase is the release of E2F-mediated transrepression of cell cycle genes, not transactivation by E2F. Furthermore, our data suggest that E2F-mediated transactivation is not necessary for the G(1)/S-phase transition in these cells.