National Profile of the ACGME Milestones 1.0 and 2.0 within General Surgery: A Seven-Year National Study from 2014 to 2021.

PURPOSE: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) introduced General Surgery Milestones 1.0 in 2014 and Milestones 2.0 in 2020 as steps toward competency-based training. Analysis will inform residency programs on curriculum development, assessment, feedback, and faculty development. This study describes the distributions and trends for Milestones 1.0 and 2.0 ratings and proportion of residents not achieving the level 4.0 graduation target. METHODS: A deidentified dataset of milestone ratings for all ACGME-accredited General Surgery residency programs in the United States was used. Medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) were reported for milestone ratings at each PGY level. Percentages of PGY-5s receiving final year ratings of less than 4.0 were calculated. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare 1.0 and 2.0 median ratings. Kruskal-Wallis and Bonferroni post-hoc tests were used to compare median ratings across time periods and PGY levels. Chi-squared tests were used to compare the proportion of level 4.0 nonachievement under both systems. RESULTS: Milestones 1.0 data consisted of 13,866 residents and Milestones 2.0 data consisted of 7,633 residents. For 1.0 and 2.0, all competency domain median ratings were higher for subsequent years of training. Milestones 2.0 had significantly higher median ratings at all PGY levels for all competency domains except Medical Knowledge. Percentages of PGY-5 residents not achieving the graduation target in Milestones 1.0 ranged from 27% to 42% and in 2.0 from 5% to 13%. For Milestones 1.0, all subcompetencies showed an increased number of residents achieving the graduation target from 2014 to 2019. CONCLUSIONS: This study of General Surgery Milestones 1.0 and 2.0 data uncovered significant increases in average ratings and significantly fewer residents not achieving the graduation target under the 2.0 system. We hypothesize that these findings may be related more to rating bias given the change in rating scales, rather than a true increase in resident ability.

The Big Sibling program: Impact of a medical student-resident mentorship program during the surgery clerkship.

BACKGROUND: We created a Big Sibling mentorship program for medical students and studied the program effects. METHODS: Between July 2019 to December 2020, students completing their surgery clerkship were paired with a Big Sibling surgical research resident. Participation in and perceptions of the program were assessed by survey. RESULTS: 81 medical students and 25 residents participated with a 79% and 95% survey response rate, respectively. The most valuable topics discussed included ward skills, personal development and career advising. Students who interacted >2 times with their Big Sibling were more likely to perceive the operating room as a positive learning environment, view attendings as role models, and receive mentoring and feedback from residents and attendings (p = 0.03, 0.02, 0.01 respectively). 78% of residents thought the program was a positive experience and no residents found it burdensome. CONCLUSION: The Big Siblings program enhances the surgery clerkship learning environment. Students who engaged with their Big Sibling had a more positive view of the clerkship and the mentorship provided by residents and attendings.