A survey of Anopheles gambiae (species A) and An. arabiensis (species B) of the An. gambiae Giles complex in the Kisumu area of Kenya following insecticidal spraying with OMS-43 (Fenitrothion).

After village huts in the Kisumu area of Kenya had been sprayed with a nominal 2 g/m2 of OMS-43 (fenitrothion) as part of an insecticidal evaluation programme 964 adults of the Anopheles gambiae complex collected from huts were identified cytogenetically as either An. gambiae (species A) or An. arabiensis (species B). Similarly, cytogenetic methods were used to identify 349 adults collected from granaries and artificial pit-shelters. In addition, 2203 larvae of the gambiae complex collected from different types of habitats were specifically identified cytogenetically. As in a previous survey made prior to insecticidal spraying, adults of An. arabiensis predominated in outdoor collections while An. gambiae was highly endophilic. However, it appeared that spraying with fenitrothion had resulted in an increase in both the degree of exophily in An. arabiensis and also its relative numbers in respect to An. gambiae, although the overall pooulation of both species was greatly reduced by spraying. Insecticidal spraying may have diverted both species from feeding on man to cattle. Except for one village, where larvae of An. arabiensis were commoner than expected in cattle hoof-prints, there was little difference between the selection of different types of larval habitats by the two sibling species. Chromosomal inversions were more common in adults of An. arabiensis than in An. gambiae.

Evaluation of fenitrothion for the control of malaria.

Fenitrothion was evaluated for residual spraying in antimalaria programmes in a large-scale field trial near Kisumu, Kenya from 1972 to 1976. The insecticide was applied in a hyper/holoendemic malarious area of 200 km(2) inhabited by about 50 000 people. All houses and animal shelters were sprayed at a target dosage rate of 2 g/m(2) at 3-month intervals for a total of 8 consecutive spray rounds in 2 years. The malaria vectors Anopheles gambiae species A and B and A. funestus were reduced to negligible densities indoors and outdoors immediately after initiation of spraying and for 10 months after the last spray round. However, A. gambiae reappeared during the main wet season at densities high enough to reestablish low-level transmission for short periods. Spraying produced a marked and rapid decrease in both the incidence and prevalence of malaria. The daily probability of acquiring malaria infection was reduced from 0.009 before spraying to 0.0003 under spray protection, a reduction of 96%. Data collected on a longitudinal basis indicated that sustained spray protection would reduce malaria prevalence to an asymptotic limit of 6.9% under the assumption that the inoculation and recovery rates remain stable. However, to attain malaria eradication in this type of epidemiological situation, complementary measures such as mass drug administration appear to be necessary.

A survey of species A and B of the Anopheles gambiae Giles complex in the Kisumu area of Kenya prior to insecticidal spraying with OMS-43 (fenitrothion).

Throughout 1972 surveys were made in Kenya on the Anopheles gambiae Giles complex in an area near Kisumu, part of which was to have all houses sprayed with OMS-43 (fenitrothion) the following year. Pre-spray data was collected on monthly hut densities, man-biting rates, parity and the human blood indices and sporozoite rates of A. gambiae caught in both an area designated for spraying (evaluation zone) and a comparison zone which was to remain unsprayed. The sporozoite rates, host preferences, and population size of the A. gambiae comples in relation to the human population were similar in the two zones. Few adults were collected from artificial pit-shelters in either zone. Cytotaxonomic identifications showed that although species A of the A. gambiae comples predominated throughout the year, the population of species B decreased relatively less in the drier months than that of species A. No marked differences were found between the host preferences or sporozoite rates of the two species.