Comparative effectiveness of exercise electrocardiography versus exercise echocardiography in women presenting with suspected coronary artery disease: a randomized study.

Aims: There is a paucity of randomized diagnostic studies in women with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). This study sought to assess the relative value of exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) compared with exercise electrocardiography (Ex-ECG) in women with CAD. Methods and results: Accordingly, 416 women with no prior CAD and intermediate probability of CAD (mean pre-test probability 41%), were randomized to undergo either Ex-ECG or ESE. The primary endpoints were the positive predictive value (PPV) for the detection of significant CAD and downstream resource utilization. The PPV of ESE and Ex-ECG were 33% and 30% (P = 0.87), respectively for the detection of CAD. There were similar clinic visits (36 vs. 29, P = 0.44) and emergency visits with chest pain (28 vs. 25, P = 0.55) in the Ex-ECG and ESE arms, respectively. At 2.9 years, cardiac events were 6 Ex-ECG vs. 3 ESE, P = 0.31. Although initial diagnosis costs were higher for ESE, more women underwent further CAD testing in the Ex-ECG arm compared to the ESE arm (37 vs. 17, P = 0.003). Overall, there was higher downstream resource utilization (hospital attendances and investigations) in the Ex-ECG arm (P = 0.002). Using National Health Service tariffs 2020/21 (British pounds) the cumulative diagnostic costs were 7.4% lower for Ex-ECG compared with ESE, but this finding is sensitive to the cost differential between ESE and Ex-ECG. Conclusion: In intermediate-risk women who are able to exercise, Ex-ECG had similar efficacy to an ESE strategy, with higher resource utilization whilst providing cost savings.

Relative clinical value of coronary computed tomography and stress echocardiography-guided management of stable chest pain patients: a propensity-matched analysis.

AIMS: The European Society of Cardiology recommends coronary computed tomography (CCT) for the assessment of low-risk patients with suspected stable angina. We aimed to assess in a real-life setting the relative clinical value of stress echocardiography (SE)- and CCT-guided management in this population. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with stable chest pain and no prior history of coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent CCT or SE as the initial investigative strategy were propensity-matched (990 patients each group-age: 59 ± 13.2 years, males: 47.9%) to account for baseline differences in cardiovascular risk factors. Inconclusive tests were 6% vs. 3% (P < 0.005) in CCT vs. SE. Severe (≥70% stenosis) on CCT and inducible ischaemia on SE detected obstructive CAD by invasive coronary angiography in 63% vs. 57% patients (P = 0.33). Over the follow-up period (median 717, interquartile range 93-1069 days) more patients underwent invasive coronary angiography (21.5% vs. 7.3%, P < 0.005), revascularization (7.3% vs. 3.5%, P < 0.005), further functional testing 33.4% vs. 8.7% (P < 0.005), but more patients were prescribed statins 8.8% vs. 3.8% (P < 0.005) in the CCT vs. the SE arm, respectively. Combined all-cause mortality and acute myocardial infarction was low-CCT-2.3% and SE-3.3%-with no significant difference (P = 0.16). CONCLUSION: Initial SE-guided management was similar for the detection of obstructive CAD, demonstrated better resource utilization, but was associated with reduced prescription of statins although with no difference in medium-term outcome compared to CCT in this very low-risk population. However, a randomized study with longer follow-up is needed to confirm the clinical value of our findings.

Sex-based impact of carotid plaque in patients with chest pain undergoing stress echocardiography.

OBJECTIVE: Women with suspected angina without history of coronary artery disease (CAD) less frequently have flow-limiting stenosis (FL-CAD) and more often have microvascular disease, affecting predictive accuracy of stress echocardiography (SE) for detection of FL-CAD. We postulated that carotid plaque burden (CPB) assessment would improve detection of FL-CAD and risk stratification. METHODS: Consecutive consenting patients assessed by SE on clinical grounds for new-onset chest pain also underwent simultaneous carotid ultrasound. Patients were followed for major adverse events (MAE): all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction and unplanned revascularisation. Carotid plaque presence and burden (CPB) were assessed. RESULTS: After a mean of 2617±469 days (range 17-3740), of 591 recruited patients, 573 (97%) outcome data (314 females) were obtainable. Despite lower pretest probability of CAD in females versus males (14.9±0.8 vs 20.5±1.3, respectively, p<0.0001), prevalence of myocardial ischaemia was similar (p=0.08). Females also had lower prevalence of both carotid plaque (p<0.0001) and FL-CAD (p<0.05). CPB improved the positive predictive value of SE for detection of FL-CAD (from 34.5% to 60%) in females but not in males. Absence of CPB in females with myocardial ischaemia ruled out FL-CAD in 93% versus 57% in males. CPB was the only independent predictor of MAE (p=0.012) in females, whereas in males both SE (p<0.0001) and CPB (p=0.003) remained significant. CONCLUSION: In females with new-onset stable angina without a history of cardiovascular disease, CPB improved the predictive accuracy of myocardial ischaemia for flow-limiting CAD. However, CPB provided incremental risk stratification in both sexes.

Long-Term Prognostic Value of Simultaneous Assessment of Atherosclerosis and Ischemia in Patients with Suspected Angina: Implications for Routine Use of Carotid Ultrasound during Stress Echocardiography.

BACKGROUND: While the impact of carotid plaque on cardiovascular events is well investigated in asymptomatic epidemiologic studies, the long-term clinical impact of carotid plaque and its burden (CPB) in patients with new-onset suspected stable angina with no history of coronary artery disease beyond stress echocardiography (SE) is not known. We sought to investigate this with a prospective study, where patients were followed up for adverse events. METHODS: Consecutive patients referred for SE underwent simultaneous carotid ultrasonography to assess CPB, defined as the total number of carotid plaques per patient. Stress echocardiography was reported off-line using a 17-segments model and four-point wall thickening scoring. Peak wall thickening scoring index was the sum of scores of each segment divided by 17. RESULTS: Of the 592 patients, 573 (age 59 ± 11, 45% male) had follow-up data. During a mean of 7.2 years, 85 patients had a first major adverse event (all-cause mortality and acute myocardial infarction: 68 had hard events and 17 had unplanned revascularization). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, pretest probability of coronary artery disease (P = .048), peak wall thickening scoring index (P < .0001), and CPB (P < .0001) predicted major adverse events; however, only CPB retained significance for both hard events and hard cardiac events (P = .001 and < .0001, respectively). Major adverse events and hard events were the least in patients with normal SE and absent carotid plaque (annualized event rate: 1.1% and 1.02%, respectively), with a significant increase in normal SE and carotid plaque disease (2.4% and 2.05%, P = .004 and P = .01, respectively). The presence of plaque did not have an impact on these outcomes in an abnormal SE cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with suspected stable angina with no history of cardiovascular disease, carotid atherosclerosis and myocardial ischemia detected by ultrasound provided synergistic information for the long-term prediction of events, but atherosclerosis predicted hard events beyond myocardial ischemia, particularly in patients with a normal SE.

Assessment of myocardial viability by myocardial contrast echocardiography: current perspectives.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The current guidelines recommend the use of myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) to assess myocardial viability. There are two clinical scenarios where detection of myocardial viability has clinical significance: in ischemic cardiomyopathy and following acute myocardial infarction with significant left ventricular dysfunction. Myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE), which utilizes microbubbles can assess the integrity of the microvasculature, which sustains myocardial viability in real time and can hence rapidly provide information on myocardial viability at the bedside without ionizing radiation. RECENT FINDINGS: We discuss the value of MCE to predict myocardial viability through the detection of the integrity of myocardial microvasculature, the newer evidences behind the MCE-derived coronary flow reserve and use of MCE postmyocardial infarction to detect no-reflow. Newer studies have also demonstrated the comparable sensitivities and specificities of MCE to single photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT), cardiac myocardial resonance imaging and PET for the detection of myocardial viability. SUMMARY: Ample evidence now exist that supports the routine use of MCE for the detection of viability as laid down in recent guidelines.