[Injection therapy of diabetes]. / Injektionstherapie (GLP1-Rezeptor Agonisten und Insulin) bei Typ 2 Diabetes mellitus (Update 2023).

The present article is a recommendation of the Austrian Diabetes Association for the practical use of injection therapy (GLP1-receptor agonists and insulin) in type 2 diabetes.

[Antihyperglycemic treatment guidelines for diabetes mellitus type 2 (Update 2023)]. / Antihyperglykämische Therapie bei Diabetes mellitus Typ 2 (Update 2023).

Hyperglycemia significantly contributes to complications in patients with diabetes mellitus. While lifestyle interventions remain cornerstones of disease prevention and treatment, most patients with type 2 diabetes will eventually require pharmacotherapy for glycemic control. The definition of individual targets regarding optimal therapeutic efficacy and safety as well as cardiovascular effects is of great importance. In this guideline we present the most current evidence-based best clinical practice data for healthcare professionals.

[Diagnosis and insulin therapy of type 1 diabetes mellitus (Update 2023)]. / Diagnostik und Therapie des Typ 1 Diabetes mellitus (Update 2023).

This guideline summarizes diagnosis of type 1 diabetes, including accompanying autoimmune disorders, insulin therapy regimens and glycemic target values.

Efficacy and tolerability of alirocumab in Austrian clinical practice - results of the non-interventional PEARL-AT study.

OBJECTIVE: Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibition can be an effective treatment in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia, particularly in cases with concomitant coronary heart disease, peripheral artery occlusive disease or cerebrovascular occlusive disease for secondary prevention after an acute atherosclerotic ischemic event. The primary objective of the PEARL-AT study was to assess effectiveness and safety of alirocumab in a real-world setting in Austria. METHODS: Non-interventional, prospective study conducted across Austria between September 2016 and July 2018. 113 patients, for whom the decision for treatment with alirocumab according to the Austrian Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) was made, were enrolled and were followed-up over 24 weeks. The primary endpoint of the study was the average change of low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels by week 24. RESULTS: In total, 112 patients with at least one post-baseline visit were included. Alirocumab was initiated using 75 mg (57.1%) and 150 mg (42.9%) every two weeks. Average LDL-C levels decreased by 75.0 mg/dl at week 24 in 87 patients with available LDL-C at baseline and week 24 (in 25 patients LDL-C was missing at least at one time point). The mean relative change of LDL-C was -50.0% (median: 57.8%, SD: 28.4). Throughout the study, 46 adverse events were documented in 21 (18.6%) patients. The most frequent adverse events were gastrointestinal disorders. CONCLUSIONS: The present data indicate a good overall efficacy of alirocumab in a real-world Austrian population. Effectiveness and safety were both in line with the clinical trial program as well as previous real-world observations.

[Diabetic kidney disease (Update 2019) : Position paper of the Austrian Diabetes Association and the Austrian Society for Nephrology]. / Diabetische Nierenerkrankung (Update 2019) : Positionspapier der Österreichischen Diabetes Gesellschaft und der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Nephrologie.

Recent epidemiological investigations have shown that approximately 2-3% of all Austrians suffer from diabetes with renal involvement, i. e. 250,000 people in Austria are affected. The risk of occurrence and progression of this disease can be ameliorated by life style interventions as well as optimization of blood pressure, blood glucose levels and special drug classes. The present article represents the joint recommendations of the Austrian Diabetes Association and the Austrian Society for Nephrology for the diagnostics and treatment strategies of diabetic kidney disease.

[Diagnosis and insulin therapy of type 1 diabetes mellitus (Update 2019)]. / Diagnostik und Therapie des Typ 1 Diabetes mellitus (Update 2019).

This guideline summarizes diagnosis of type 1 diabetes, including accompanying autoimmune disorders, insulin therapy regimens and glycemic target values.

[Insulin therapy of type 2 diabetes mellitus (Update 2019)]. / Insulintherapie bei Typ 2 Diabetes mellitus (Update 2019).

The present article is a recommendation of the Austrian Diabetes Association for the practical use of insulin in type 2 diabetes, including the various insulin regimens.

[Antihyperglycemic treatment guidelines for diabetes mellitus type 2 (Update 2019)]. / Antihyperglykämische Therapie bei Diabetes mellitus Typ 2 (Update 2019).

Hyperglycemia significantly contributes to complications in patients with diabetes mellitus. While lifestyle interventions remain cornerstones of disease prevention and treatment, most patients with type 2 diabetes will eventually require pharmacotherapy for glycemic control. The definition of individual targets regarding optimal therapeutic efficacy and safety as well as cardiovascular effects is of great importance. In this guideline we present the most current evidence-based best clinical practice data for healthcare professionals.

Use and effectiveness of a fixed-ratio combination of insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) in a real-world population with type 2 diabetes: Results from a European, multicentre, retrospective chart review study.

AIMS: To describe the real-world use and effectiveness of IDegLira, a fixed-ratio combination of the basal insulin degludec, and the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) liraglutide. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This European, multicentre, retrospective chart review comprised adults (n = 611) with type 2 diabetes, who started IDegLira ≥6 months before data collection. Clinical characteristics were assessed at baseline (defined as the most recent recording during the 6 months before the first IDegLira prescription) and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months (± 45 days for each time point) after commencing IDegLira, where data were available. RESULTS: Baseline regimens included non-injectable medications (19%), basal insulin (19%), GLP-1RA (10%), free combination therapy (insulin/GLP-1RA, 24%) and multiple daily-dose insulin injections (MDI, 28%), all ± oral antidiabetic drugs. After 6 months, significant glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) reductions were observed in patients overall and in all subgroups (-10 mmol/mol [-0.9%] overall; P < .0001), and a significant reduction in mean body weight (-0.7 kg; P < .05) was observed in patients overall and in patients receiving MDI (-2.4 kg; P < .0001). The mean IDegLira dose was 22, 30 and 32 dose steps at initiation, and at 6 and 12 months follow-up, respectively. In total, only 67 patients reached the maximum 50 dose steps, with most coming from the free combination therapy (n = 31) or MDI (n = 15) baseline regimen groups. Hypoglycaemia rates were reduced by 82% (rate ratio 0.18; P < .0001) in the 6-month period after vs before IDegLira initiation. Overall, a total of 12 patients experienced 15 events in the 6 months after IDegLira initiation. CONCLUSION: In real-world practice, after 6 months and at a moderate dose, IDegLira resulted in substantial reductions in HbA1c and body weight, with a reduced risk of hypoglycaemia.

A European, multicentre, retrospective, non-interventional study (EU-TREAT) of the effectiveness of insulin degludec after switching basal insulin in a population with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of switching to insulin degludec (IDeg) in insulin-treated patients with either type 1 diabetes (T1DM) or type 2 diabetes (T2DM) under conditions of routine clinical care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a multicentre, retrospective, chart review study. In all patients, basal insulin was switched to IDeg at least 6 months before the start of data collection. Baseline was defined as the most recent recording during the 3-month period before first prescription of IDeg. Values are presented as mean [95%CI]. RESULTS: T1DM (n = 1717): HbA1c decreased by -2.2 [-2.6; -2.0] mmol/mol (-0.20 [-0.24; -0.17]%) at 6 months vs baseline (P < .001). Rate ratio of overall (0.79 [0.69; 0.89]), non-severe nocturnal (0.54 [0.42; 0.69]) and severe (0.15 [0.09; 0.24]) hypoglycaemia was significantly lower in the 6-month post-switch period vs the pre-switch period (P < .001 for all). Total daily insulin dose decreased by -4.88 [-5.52; -4.24] U (-11%) at 6 months vs baseline (P < .001). T2DM (n = 833): HbA1c decreased by -5.6 [-6.3; -4.7] mmol/mol (-0.51 [-0.58; -0.43] %) at 6 months vs baseline (P < .001). Rate ratio of overall (0.39 [0.27; 0.58], P < .001), non-severe nocturnal (0.10 [0.06; 0.16], P < .001) and severe (0.075 [0.01; 0.43], P = .004) hypoglycaemia was significantly lower in the 6-month post-switch period vs the pre-switch period. Total daily insulin dose decreased by -2.48 [-4.24; -0.71] U (-3%) at 6 months vs baseline (P = .006). Clinical outcomes for T1DM and T2DM at 12 months were consistent with results at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that switching patients to IDeg from other basal insulins improves glycaemic control and significantly reduces the risk of hypoglycaemia in routine clinical practice.

Safety and efficacy of IDegLira titrated once weekly versus twice weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on oral antidiabetic drugs: DUAL VI randomized clinical trial.

AIMS: To compare the safety and efficacy of a simpler titration algorithm for insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) with that used in previous DUAL trials in insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This 32-week, open-label, non-inferiority trial randomized adults with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on metformin ± pioglitazone to receive IDegLira, titrated either once weekly, based on the mean of 2 pre-breakfast plasma glucose (PG) readings (n = 210), or twice weekly, based on the mean of 3 pre-breakfast PG readings (n = 210). RESULTS: Mean HbA1c decreased from 8.2% (65 mmol/mol) to 6.1% (43 mmol/mol) with once-weekly titration and from 8.1% (65 mmol/mol) to 6.0% (42 mmol/mol) with twice-weekly titration; non-inferiority was confirmed (estimated treatment difference: 0.12% [-0.04; 0.28]95%CI , 1.30 mmol/mol [-0.41; 3.01]95%CI ). Approximately 90% of patients achieved HbA1c < 7% in each arm. Mean fasting PG was similar after 32 weeks. Weight change was -1.0 kg vs -2.0 kg for once-weekly vs twice-weekly titration. Rates of severe or blood glucose-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia were low in both arms: 0.16 events/patient-year of exposure (PYE) for once-weekly, 0.76 events/PYE for twice-weekly titration. Mean IDegLira dose at 32 weeks was 41 dose steps (41 U IDeg/1.48 mg Lira) for both arms. Overall adverse event rates were 207.8 and 241.3 events/100 PYE with once-weekly and twice-weekly titration, respectively. CONCLUSION: A pragmatic titration algorithm with once-weekly adjustments based on 2 PG readings resulted in a safety and glycaemic efficacy profile similar to that with twice-weekly adjustments based on 3 preceding PG values in insulin-naïve patients.

GDF-15 Is Associated with Cancer Incidence in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes has been linked epidemiologically to increased cancer incidence and mortality. Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15) is increased in patients with diabetes and has recently been linked to the occurrence of cancer. We investigated whether circulating GDF-15 concentrations can predict the incidence of malignant diseases in a diabetic patient cohort already facing increased risk for cancer. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled a total of 919 patients with type 2 diabetes and no history of malignant disease, who were clinically followed up for 60 months. GDF-15, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and troponin T were measured at baseline; an additional 4 cardiovascular biomarkers were determined for a subpopulation (n = 259). Study end point was defined as the first diagnosis of any type of cancer during the follow-up period. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 60 months, 66 patients (7.2%) were diagnosed with cancer. Baseline circulating GDF-15 concentrations were higher in patients that developed cancer over the follow-up period when compared to cancer-free patients. Increased GDF-15 concentrations were significantly associated with cancer incidence [crude hazard ratio (HR) per 1-IQR (interquartile range) increase 2.13, 95% CI 1.53-2.97, P < 0.001]. This effect persisted after multivariate adjustment with an adjusted HR of 1.86 (95% CI 1.22-2.84; P = 0.004). Among the 4 additionally tested cardiovascular markers in the subpopulation, only troponin T and C-terminal proendothelin-1 showed a significant association with future cancer incidence with unadjusted HRs of 1.71 (95% CI 1.28-2.28, P < 0.001) and 1.68 (95% CI 1.02-2.76, P = 0.042), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Increased circulating concentrations of GDF-15 are associated with increased cancer incidence in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Cardiovascular safety of metformin and sulfonylureas in patients with different cardiac risk profiles.

OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND: Based on previous experiences, the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency recommend that clinical trials for novel antidiabetic drugs are powered to detect increased cardiovascular risk. In this context, data concerning licensed drugs such as metformin and sulfonylureas are conflicting. The influence of baseline cardiovascular risk on any treatment effect appears obvious but has not been formally proven. We therefore evaluated association of metformin and sulfonylureas with cardiovascular events in patients with different cardiovascular risk profiles indicated by N-terminal of the prohormone brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels. METHODS: 2024 patients with diabetes mellitus were included in this observational study. The primary endpoint was defined as a combination of cardiovascular events and death. Association of metformin and sulfonylureas was assessed using Cox regression models. Possible differences of these associations in patients with different NT-proBNP levels were studied by stratifying and through interaction analysis. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 60 months, the primary endpoint occurred in 522 (26%) of patients. The median age was 63 years. A Cox regression analysis was adjusted for site of treatment, concomitant medication, age, gender, body mass index, glycated haemoglobin, duration of diabetes, glomerular filtration rate, cholesterol, and history of smoking and cardiac disease. Metformin was associated with a decreased risk in the cohort with elevated NT-proBNP ≥300 pg/mL (HR 0.70, p=0.014) and a similar association was found for the interaction between metformin and NT-proBNP (p=0.001). There was neither an association for sulfonylureas nor a significant interaction between sulfonylureas and NT-proBNP. CONCLUSIONS: Metformin is associated with beneficial cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetes only when (sub)clinical cardiovascular risk defined by NT-proBNP levels is present.

[Type 2 Diabetes mellitus-screening and prevention: Update 2016]. / Typ 2 Diabetes mellitus - Screening und Prävention : Update 2016.

The prevalence of diabetes is increasing in westernized countries. In addition, about half of all patients suffering from diabetes are not diagnosed. The current article represents the recommendations of the Austrian Diabetes Association for the screening and prevention of type 2 diabetes, based on currently available evidence.

[Insulin therapy of diabetes]. / Insulintherapie bei Diabetes mellitus.

Hyperglycemia contributes to morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes. Thus, reaching treatment targets with regard to control of glycemia is a central goal in the therapy of diabetic patients. The present article represents the recommendations of the Austrian Diabetes Association for the practical use of insulin according to current scientific evidence and clinical studies.

[Diabetic kidney disease - Update 2016]. / Diabetische Nierenerkrankung - Update 2016 : Positionspapier der Österreichischen Diabetes Gesellschaft und der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Nephrologie.

Recent epidemiological evaluations have shown that approximately 5% of all Austrians suffer from diabetes including renal involvement, i. e. 400.000 people in Austria are affected. The risk of start and progression of this disease can be ameliorated by lifestyle interventions as well as optimization of blood pressure and glucose levels. The present article represents the joint recommendations of the Austrian Diabetes Association and the Austrian Society for Nephrology for the prevention and treatment of diabetic kidney disease.

[CGM-Continuous Glucose Monitoring--Statement of the Austrian Diabetes Association]. / Kontinuierliche Glukosemessung (CGM - Continuous Glucose Monitoring) bei Diabetes mellitus.

This position statement represents the recommendations of the Austrian Diabetes Association regarding the clinical diagnostic and therapeutic application, safety and benefits of continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring systems in patients with diabetes mellitus, based on current evidence.

[Insulin pump therapy in children, adolescents and adults]. / Insulinpumpentherapie bei Kindern, Jugendlichen und Erwachsenen.

This position statement is based on the current evidence available on the safety and benefits of continuous subcutaneous insulin pump therapy (CSII) in diabetes with an emphasis on the effects of CSII on glycemic control, hypoglycaemia rates, occurrence of ketoacidosis, quality of life and the use of insulin pump therapy in pregnancy. The current article represents the recommendations of the Austrian Diabetes Association for the clinical praxis of insulin pump treatment in children, adolescents and adults.

[Antihyperglycemic treatment guidelines for diabetes mellitus type 2]. / Antihyperglykämische Therapie bei Diabetes mellitus Typ 2 : Grundsatz Statement.

Hyperglycemia significantly contributes to micro- and macrovascular complications in patients with diabetes mellitus. While lifestyle interventions remain cornerstones of disease prevention and treatment, most patients with type 2 diabetes will eventually require pharmacotherapy for glycemic control. The definition of individual targets regarding optimal therapeutic efficacy and safety is of great importance. In this guideline we present the most current evidence-based best clinical practice data for healthcare professionals.

Efficacy and tolerability of vildagliptin-based versus comparative dual therapy in type 2 diabetes : Results of the Austrian subpopulation of the EDGE study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this post hoc analysis of data from the Austrian subpopulation of the EDGE study was the evaluation of the effectiveness and tolerability of vildagliptin as an add-on to an existing oral antidiabetic (OAD) monotherapy versus a combination therapy with two OADs without vildagliptin in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In Austria, 422 patients were included. In the framework of regular visits (at baseline, about once per quarter, and at the study end, after 12 months), adverse events (AEs), courses, and changes of therapy were recorded. In addition to the primary end point defined in the primary study, i.e., a reduction of HbA1c by > 0.3 % without hypoglycemia, weight gain ≥ 5 %, peripheral edema, or discontinuation due to gastrointestinal events, the most clinically relevant secondary end point, i.e., HbA1c reduction < 7 % without hypoglycemia or ≥ 3 % increase in body weight after 12 months was used for the analysis of the Austrian data. RESULTS: The initial HbA1c of all enrolled patients was 8.3 ± 1.4 %. The mean reduction of HbA1c was - 1.1 % in the vildagliptin cohort and - 1.0 % in the comparator cohort. In the vildagliptin cohort, 56.4 % of patients, and in the comparator cohort, 45.9 % of patients, reached the primary end point (odds ratio: 1.53, p = 0.04). In the vildagliptin cohort, 18.7 % of patients, and in the comparator cohort, 16.9 % of patients, reached the secondary end point (odds ratio: 1.13, p = 0.68). The incidence of hypoglycemic events (two in each cohort), AEs (approximately 15 % in each cohort), and serious AEs (approximately 2 % in each cohort) was comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: In a "real-life" setting, the effectiveness of vildagliptin as second-line treatment is superior to comparator OADs with regard to a reduction in HbA1c of greater than 0.3 % from baseline without well-recognized side effects in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (mean baseline HbA1c: 8.5 % (vildagliptin cohort) vs. 8.1 % (comparator cohort)).