Classification of a traumatic brain injury: the Glasgow Coma scale is not enough.

BACKGROUND: Classifying the severity of a traumatic brain injury (TBI) solely by means of the Glasgow Coma scale (GCS) is under scrutiny, because it overlooks other important clinical signs. Clinicians treating patients with acute TBI are well placed to suggest which variables, in addition to the GCS, should concur in a new classification of TBI. METHODS: In Italy, acute TBI patients are treated by anaesthetists, and so we asked them, in a questionnaire survey, to rate the weight they give to the GCS and to other clinical variables in their approach to TBI. Because sedation may underestimate GCS scores, we also inquired whether anaesthetists select sedatives that allow drug-free GCS scores. The questionnaire was distributed to 1334 anaesthetists attending courses on neurotrauma; the response rate was 63%. RESULTS: Two thirds of the respondents believe that the definition of severe TBI should include, in addition to GCS scores, pupil reactivity to light and computer tomogram (CT) findings, the variables that guide Italian anaesthetists in TBI management. Most respondents (68.2%) administer sedation which allows prompt neurological evaluation and reliable GCS scoring. A minority of respondents (9.3%) withhold or antagonize sedation, delay tracheal intubation or allow patient-ventilator asynchrony. CONCLUSIONS: Italian anaesthetists would welcome a definition of TBI severity that includes CT findings and pupil reactivity in addition to the GCS.

Mixed dishomogeneous hemorrhagic brain contusions. Mapping of cerebral blood flow.

The aim of the study was to verify whether regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) was distributed centrifugally in traumatic hemorrhagic contusions with multiple cores within an oedematous area. Seventeen traumatic brain contusions, from 14 patients with severe head injury (GCS < 9), were analyzed during 39 Xenon-enhanced computerized tomography (Xe-CT) studies. The CBF was measured in 3 concentric regions of interest (ROls): the hemorrhagic core, the intracontusional oedematous low density area and a 1 cm rim of pericontusional normal-appearing brain tissue surrounding the contusion. Differences between rCBFs in the three ROIs were found (p < 0.0001). rCBF in both the hemorrhagic core (21.4 +/- 19.4 ml/ 100gr/min) and the intracontusional low density area (28.4 +/- 19 ml/100gr/min) were lower than rCBF in pericontusional normal-appearing area (41.9 +/- 16 ml/100gr/min) (p < 0.0001). No significant differences were found between rCBF measured in the hemorrhagic core and intracontusional low density area (p = 0.184). Our study suggests that in the mixed density contusions with multiple hemorrhagic cores, the CBF is concentrically distributed, improving from the core to the periphery.