ABSTRACT
Background High neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) may be used as a reliable measure of vascular complications and an indicator of poor outcomes in cases of diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods A prospective analytical cross-sectional observational study was conducted at the Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS), Ranchi, Jharkhand, India. A total of 100 patients with DM who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the study. A pre-tested and semi-structured questionnaire was given to the patients. IBM SPSS software version 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and MedCalc trial version 20.114 (MedCalc Software Ltd., Ostend, Belgium) were used for data analysis. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the association of the NLR with microvascular complications. Results In our study, the male-to-female ratio was 1.78:1 (male: 64 (n)%, female: 36 (n)%). The mean age of our study population was 56.28 ± 13.24 years. Of 58 patients with microvascular complications, 34 had a high NLR, and 24 patients had a normal NLR. Of 42 patients without microvascular complications, only 14 had a high NLR, and the remaining 28 patients had a normal NLR (p = 0.012). Logistic regression was performed to analyze the association between the NLR and microvascular complications, which demonstrated a significant association (odds ratio (OR): 2.833, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.238-6.481; p = 0.013). Conclusions Our study demonstrated the higher odds of having microvascular complications among diabetics with a high NLR compared with non-diabetics. Therefore, the NLR may be used as a measure of microvascular complications in the diabetic population.
ABSTRACT
Blood centers, which are arguably the backbone of every hospital, depend on blood donors for a constant and regular supply of blood. Like many other fields, the COVID-19 pandemic severely affected blood donations. In this article, we aim to systematically search the studies done on blood donation during the COVID-19 pandemic period, analyze the pandemic's effect on blood donation, and examine the methodology used to overcome the problem. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on blood donation. Two independent reviewers searched different databases, such as PubMed, ProQuest, Scopus, and Google Scholar. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for overall study characteristics. We included a total of 15 studies. There was an overall decrease in blood donation of 25%, with some regions showing a decrease of as much as 71%. However, some regions were able to experience a 2-10% increase in blood donation after taking stringent and early measures to prevent such decreases. The COVID-19 pandemic and consequent lockdown greatly affected blood transfusion services, resulting in a progressive decline in blood donations that threatened the lives of many patients who were fully dependent on blood transfusion. However, by making appropriate and early decisions and taking action, policymakers and the rest of society can prevent such shortages, potentially saving millions of lives.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Tuberculous peritonitis is difficult to diagnose due to its non-specific clinical manifestations and lack of proper diagnostic modalities. Current meta-analysis was performed to find the overall diagnostic accuracy of adenosine deaminase (ADA) in diagnosing tuberculous peritonitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane library were searched to retrieve the published studies which assessed the role of ascitic fluid ADA in diagnosing tuberculous peritonitis from Jan 1980 to June 2022. This meta-analysis included 20 studies and 2,291 participants after fulfilling the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: The pooled sensitivity was 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85 - 0.94) and pooled specificity was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92 - 0.95). The positive likelihood ratio was 15.20 (95% CI: 11.70 - 19.80), negative likelihood ratio was 0.10 (95% CI: 0.07 - 0.16) and diagnostic odds ratio was 149 (95% CI: 86 - 255). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.97. Cut- off value and sample size were found to be the sources of heterogeneity in the mete-regression analysis. CONCLUSION: Ascitic fluid ADA is a useful test for the diagnosis of tuberculous peritonitis with good sensitivity and specificity however, with very low certainty of evidence evaluated by Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Further well- designed studies are needed to validate the diagnostic accuracy of ascitic fluid ADA for tuberculous peritonitis.
ABSTRACT
Tuberculous meningitis is the most serious complication of tuberculosis. Early diagnosis is crucial to start relevant treatment to prevent death and disability. Electronic databases PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library were used to find relevant articles from January 1980 to June 2022. The random-effect model in terms of pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) with 95% confidence interval was adopted to derive the diagnostic efficacy of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) adenosine deaminase (ADA) for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis (TBM) in adult patients. A total of 22 studies (20 prospective and two retrospective data) have been included in this meta-analysis, having 1927 participants. We perceived acceptable pooled sensitivity, specificity, summary receiver operating characteristics (SROCs), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.77-0.90), 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85-0.93), 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91-0.96) and 48 (95% CI: 26-86), respectively, for CSF-ADA for differentiating TBM from non-TBM in adult patients. To ascertain the certainty of evidence for CSF-ADA as a diagnostic marker for TBM, Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) analysis was used. CSF-ADA is an auspicious diagnostic test with a high degree of specificity and acceptable sensitivity for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis, however, with very low certainty of evidence.
