ABSTRACT
Mentoring plays a crucial role in increasing the attractiveness of primary care careers for medical students. Based on a literature review and structured group discussions, the authors developed a primary care mentoring platform centred on undergraduate medical students' needs. All second- to sixth-year students were invited to enrol into the programme by choosing a mentor from an online platform, which was pilot tested during one academic year (2021-2022) with 16 mentors. Fifteen mentees enrolled into the pilot programme. The evaluation assessed the procedures' feasibility as well as the student-centeredness and acceptability of the programme. Mentees completed a quantitative survey evaluating satisfaction and the mentoring relationship's personal and content aspects. Mentors' feedback was collected during focus groups discussing the programme's acceptability and practical aspects. Both mentees and mentors expressed high levels of satisfaction with the programme. Mentees rated their mentoring relationships highly across most aspects. Mentees' content-related needs included postgraduate training, meeting an inspiring person, work-life balance, and questions about running a private practice. Mentors described the programme as a rewarding experience. They enjoyed the flexible structure that allowed them to adapt to the mentees' individual needs. Maintaining the relationship was mostly the mentors' responsibility. Further structured guidance from the programme coordinators was identified as potentially beneficial for future implementation. The findings highlight the feasibility and the advantages of a flexible, student-centred mentoring programme. The programme attracted students interested in primary care from all levels of undergraduate education. Such programmes may contribute to fostering students' interest in primary care careers.
ABSTRACT
February 2022: Russia attacks Ukraine. Anticipating the wave of refugees generated by this war, the Geneva University Hospitals create a Ukraine Task Force. In this context, the Programme Santé Migrants (PSM), a reference consultation for refugees, realises that it will not be able to cope with the number of those coming from Ukraine in addition to the others, and creates a parallel structure: the PSM bis. The article describes how it was set up and the challenges that were faced, in particular: express training of staff in ambulatory medicine in a context of migratory crisis, focus on early identification of mental health problems and their management. This experience highlights the importance of a coordinated, interdisciplinary, and culturally adapted approach to responding to a crisis situation.
Février 2022 : la Russie attaque l'Ukraine. Anticipant la vague de réfugiés générée par cette guerre, les Hôpitaux universitaires de Genève créent une Task Force Ukraine. Dans ce contexte, le Programme santé migrants (PSM), consultation de référence pour les réfugiés, réalise qu'il ne pourra pas faire face au nombre de ceux venant d'Ukraine en plus des autres et créé une structure parallèle : le PSM bis. L'article relate comment elle s'est mise en place et les défis qui ont été affrontés, notamment : formation express du personnel à la médecine ambulatoire dans un contexte de crise migratoire et focus sur l'identification précoce des problèmes de santé mentale et leur prise en charge. Cette expérience souligne l'importance d'une approche coordonnée, interprofessionnelle et culturellement adaptée, pour répondre à une situation de crise.
Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care , Delivery of Health Care , Health Services Needs and Demand , Refugees , Transients and Migrants , Humans , Emigration and Immigration , Ethnicity , Medicine , Mental Disorders/ethnology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Needs Assessment , Armed ConflictsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence and types of ophthalmic complications associated with maxillofacial trauma over a period of 24 months. METHODS: An institutional prospective study was conducted on 62 patients presenting with maxillofacial trauma to study the correlation between facial trauma and ophthalmic complications. RESULTS: Road traffic accidents were reported to be the primary etiologic factor for most trauma cases studied. Zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fracture was associated with more ophthalmic complications while fractures involving the orbital rims and walls were associated with severe complications. CONCLUSIONS: Maxillofacial trauma, particularly those associated with midface, including ZMC fracture, Le Fort II, Le Fort III, and naso-orbito-ethmoidal fractures, can commonly cause ophthalmic complications and blindness in rare cases. Hence, every patient with maxillofacial trauma should undergo an ophthalmic examination and should be placed under close observation for necessary treatment when required.
ABSTRACT
The death of a patient taking opioids can generate strong feelings of guilt. « Have I hastened my patient's death by my administration of opioids ? ¼ Doubts may arise in certain situations, despite the proven safety of appropriate opioid use in the management of dyspnea and pain in the palliative care setting. Fearing the harms of opioid administration, some medical practitioners may undertreat patients, forsaking them to suffering. Other doctors, desperate to relieve their excruciating suffering at all cost, may in fact have recourse to euthanizing acts. This article seeks to answer this ethical dilemma with an overview of the double effect principle.
La mort d'un patient en situation palliative sous opioïde génère parfois un fort sentiment de culpabilité. « Ai-je précipité le décès du patient avec mon traitement opioïde ? ¼ Bien que la littérature soit très claire quant à la sécurité des opioïdes utilisés correctement pour la gestion de la dyspnée ou de la douleur en soins palliatifs, il se peut que, dans certaines situations, on puisse en douter. Le médecin, face à sa crainte de nuire en administrant des opioïdes, pourrait être tenté de sous-traiter le patient, au risque de l'abandonner à sa souffrance. D'un autre côté, l'impuissance face à l'intensité de la souffrance du patient pourrait amener le médecin à vouloir le soulager à tout prix, au risque d'un geste euthanasiant. Cet article propose un aperçu du principe du double effet, comme élément de réponse à ce dilemme éthique.
