From Acute Infection to Prolonged Health Consequences: Understanding Health Disparities and Economic Implications in Long COVID Worldwide.

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a growing number of patients experiencing persistent symptoms and physiological changes after recovering from acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, known as Long COVID. Long COVID is characterized by recurring symptoms and inflammation across multiple organ systems. Diagnosis can be challenging, influenced by factors like demographics, comorbidities, and immune responses. Long COVID impacts various organ systems and can have neuropsychological effects. Health disparities, particularly related to race, contribute to a higher burden of infection and ongoing symptoms in minority populations. Managing Long COVID entails addressing a spectrum of symptoms that encompass physical, cognitive, and psychological aspects. The recovery period for patients with Long COVID can vary significantly, influenced by factors like the severity of the disease, hospitalization, comorbidities, and age. Currently, there are no universally effective treatments, although certain interventions show promise, necessitating further research. Self-management and rehabilitation programs can provide relief, but more research is needed to establish their effectiveness. Preventive measures such as vaccination and the use of antiviral medications and metformin. It is imperative to conduct further research to develop evidence-based guidelines and gain a better understanding of the long-term implications of COVID-19. Long COVID could have substantial economic impact on the labor market, productivity, healthcare expenditures, and overall economic growth. To address the challenges patients with long-term complications face, there is a focus on strategies like promoting telework and flexible work arrangements to accommodate diverse symptoms, particularly chronic fatigue and other Long COVID effects. In conclusion, this review emphasizes the multifaceted complexity of Long COVID and the ongoing need to address its potential long-term health and economic impacts.

Vaccination in the Era of Immunosuppression.

Patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRDs) are at increased risk for severe infections. Vaccine responses and safety profiles may differ between AIIRD patients and the general population. While patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRDs) often experience diminished humoral responses and reduced vaccine efficacy, factors such as the type of immunosuppressant medications used and the specific vaccine employed contribute to these outcomes. Notably, individuals undergoing B cell depletion therapy tend to have poor vaccine immunogenicity. However, despite these considerations, vaccine responses are generally considered clinically sufficient. Ideally, immunosuppressed AIIRD patients should receive vaccinations at least two weeks before commencing immunosuppressive treatment. However, it is common for many patients to already be on immunosuppressants during the immunization process. Vaccination rarely triggers flares in AIIRDs; if flares occur, they are typically mild. Despite the heightened infection risk, including COVID-19, among AIIRD patients with rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, sarcoidosis, and other diseases on immunosuppressants, the vaccination rates remain suboptimal. The future directions of vaccination in the era of immunosuppression will likely involve customized vaccines with enhanced adjuvants and alternative delivery methods. By addressing the unique challenges faced by immunosuppressed individuals, we may improve vaccine efficacy, reduce the risk of infections, and ultimately enhance the health outcomes. Additionally, clinical trials to evaluate the safety and efficacy of temporarily discontinuing immunosuppressants during vaccination in various AIIRDs are crucial.

T-cell Large Granular Lymphocytic Leukemia and Felty Syndrome in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Case Report.

T-cell large granular lymphocytic (LGL) leukemia is characterized by a clonal proliferation of CD3+ T-cells and has been associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Splenomegaly is a common finding and a majority of cases present with cytopenia. Felty syndrome (FS) is characterized by neutropenia and splenomegaly and is also classically described in the literature for its association with RA. Similarities in clinical features, pathogenesis, management, genetics, and immunologic basis of FS and T-cell LGL leukemia have led to the suggestion that they exist on the same spectrum of disease. We present a case of T-cell LGL leukemia in an RA patient with clinical features not distinguishable from features of FS.

Hyperemesis Gravidarum Complicated by Wernicke's Encephalopathy: A Case Report.

Wernicke's encephalopathy (WE) is a rare neurologic disease caused by a deficiency in thiamine (B1). It is characterized by features of altered mental status, cerebellar dysfunction, and ophthalmoplegia. Most often, cases are attributed to long-term alcohol use; however, rarer causes have been described in the literature. In this article, we describe a case of WE caused by hyperemesis gravidarum in a 19-year-old female with no known medical history.

The Atherogenic Index of Plasma is Independently Associated with Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis.

INTRODUCTION: Small, dense low-density lipoprotein (sdLDL) is strongly associated with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, but is not routinely evaluated in ischemic stroke patients. A method using the logarithmic transformation of the ratio of the plasma concentration of triglycerides (TGY) to HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C)[(Log[TGY/HDL-C])] has been described as a surrogate marker for sdLDL termed the atherogenic index of plasma (AIP). OBJECTIVE: To determine if the AIP is independently associated with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. METHODS: We conducted a single center case-controlled study using a sample of ischemic stroke patients and compared risk factors of patients with and without symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to determine if the AIP divided into four quartiles was independently associated with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. This model was compared to three other lipid models. Associations between non-lipid variables and the AIP were also identified. RESULTS: 31 cases of ischemic stroke due to symptomatic carotid artery stenosis and 236 controls of ischemic stroke not due to carotid artery stenosis were identified. Of the four lipid models assessed, only the model including the AIP (model 4) was found to be significantly associated with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. The odd's ratio (OR) for quartile 3 was 3.82 (95% CI 1.03-14.17) and the OR for quartile 4 was 4.13 (95% CI 1.09-15.54) using quartile 1 as a reference. Metabolic syndrome was the only variable associated with the AIP (OR 5.06 95% CI 2.6-9.7). CONCLUSION: At our single center, the AIP was the only lipid parameter independently associated with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis; and metabolic syndrome was independently associated with the AIP. The AIP may serve as a useful surrogate of sdLDL in patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis.