ABSTRACT
ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of polyherbal formulation (designated as IP) in comparison to placebo as add on to the standard of care (SoC) among patients with mild to moderate novel corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) MethodsLaboratory proved patients of mild to moderate COVID-19 disease were randomized to either placebo or IP as an add-on to SoC. Using quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRTPCR), we assessed the effect on viral load (VL). Change in immunological parameters such as blood lymphocyte subset, serum immunoglobulin was determined. The clinical improvement was assessed using a numerical rating scale (NRS) and WHO ordinal scale. Patients were followed for 30 days after randomization. ResultsIn total, 72 patients were randomized to either placebo (n=33) and IP (n=39). Fifty-two patients (n=21 in placebo and n=31 in IP arm) had qRT-PCR on day 0 and day 4. There was significant reduction in VL in IP arm (from 662081 copies/mL on day 0 to 48963 copies/mL on day 4; p=0.002)) but not in the placebo arm (from 385670 copies/mL on day 0 to 66845 copies/mL on day 4, p=0.106). Change in the NRS score and WHO ordinal scale score was significant in both treatment arms. However, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant in favour of drug group. The increase in Th1 response was significant in the IP arm (p=0.023) but not in the placebo arm (p=0.098), thus implying immunomodulatory activity in the drug. No safety concerns were observed in any of the trial participants. ConclusionThis study finds that polyherbal formulation reduces viral load and contributes to immunomodulation and improvement in clinical conditions when used as add-on to the standard care in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 without any side effects. These findings need to be further confirmed in a large, prospective, randomized study.
