The potential public health impact of the respiratory syncytial virus prefusion F protein vaccine in people aged ≥60 years in Japan: results of a Markov model analysis.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), a common respiratory pathogen, can lead to severe symptoms, especially in older adults (OA). A recently developed RSV prefusion F protein (RSVPreF3 OA) vaccine confers high protection against RSV lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD) over two full RSV seasons. The aim of this study was to assess the potential public health impact of RSVPreF3 OA vaccination in the Japanese OA population. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A static Markov model was used to estimate the number of symptomatic RSV cases, hospitalizations and deaths in the Japanese population aged ≥ 60 years over a 3-year time horizon. Japan-specific RSV epidemiology and healthcare resource use parameters were used; vaccine efficacy was derived from a phase 3 randomized study (AReSVi-006, NCT04886596). Vaccination coverage was set to 50%. RESULTS: Without vaccination, >5 million RSV acute respiratory illness (ARI) would occur (2.5 million LRTD and 2.8 million upper respiratory tract infections) leading to ~ 3.5 million outpatient visits, >534,000 hospitalizations and ~ 25,500 RSV-related deaths over 3 years. Vaccination could prevent > 1 million RSV-ARI cases, 728,000 outpatient visits, 143,000 hospitalizations and 6,840 RSV-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: RSVPreF3 OA vaccination is projected to have a substantial public health impact by reducing RSV-related morbidity and mortality in the OA population.

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is one of the most frequent disease-causing agents that leads to common cold symptoms. In older adults, infection with RSV can result in severe complications including bronchitis/bronchiolitis, lung infection (pneumonia) and in rare cases death. Older people and people with chronic heart or lung disease are more likely to experience complications. We estimated that more than 5 million RSV cases occur in older adults (≥60 years) over a three-year period (1.8 million over one year). Many older adults (≥60 years) will see their treating physician because of an acute RSV infection or will be hospitalized.Recently, a vaccine has been registered which protects older adults against RSV disease: the RSV prefusion F protein Older Adult (RSVPreF3 OA) vaccine. Vaccination with RSVPreF3 OA could prevent RSV infection in the older adult population and reduce the number of outpatient visits and hospitalizations; the impact is particularly high in Japan, where 35% of people are 60 years or older. We used a public health impact model to estimate how many RSV cases, hospitalizations and deaths could be prevented if 50% of people aged ≥ 60 years received the RSVPreF3 OA vaccine: We found that the vaccine could prevent about 1 million RSV infections, more than 728,000 outpatient visits, approximately 143,000 hospitalizations and 6,840 RSV-related deaths over a three-year period.Adding RSVPreF3 OA vaccine to the national immunization program in Japan could protect older adults against RSV disease and reduce the burden on patients and the healthcare system.

The Role of Indication-Based Pricing in Future Pricing and Reimbursement Policies: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVES: Indication-based pricing (IBP) has received growing attention because of the expected increase in the number of new medicines with multiple indications. In our systematic review, we assess the potential benefits, barriers, current experiences, and future perspectives of different IBP mechanisms. METHODS: We searched publications in English, Spanish, or French assessing the impact, international experience, and future context of IBP systems on PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, EconLit, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment from 2000 to 2020. This was complemented by a gray literature search in Google Scholar. RESULTS: A total of 29 publications that specifically addressed the topic of IBP were retained. The most commonly reported benefits of IBP were a better alignment of medicines' value and price, optimization of research and development incentives and increase of competition, and improvement of patients' access to treatments. Data collection and proper infrastructures, and the risk of high administrative burden and associated costs, were seen as the main barriers for proper IBP implementation. International experience lacks concrete examples of IBP. A single weighted average price according to volume, value, or a combination of both, appears to be the most used methodology, followed by different confidential net prices per indication. Different brands with distinct price per indication are less common, although it is considered a pure IBP system. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of IBP impact is still scarce, and there is a need for pilot projects and experiences to monitor its real consequences. An appropriate price and reimbursement model for multi-indication medicines should be a priority, but political will and proper data collection systems remain crucial.