Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 279(8): 3847-3855, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34671858

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To study and analyse the radiological and surgical findings of 24 cochlear implantees with SMS type II cochleovestibular malformation and to compare their outcomes in terms of hearing and speech gains pre- and postoperatively. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of cochlear implanted candidates over a period of 8 year 6 months from 3 institutions was undertaken and 24 patients suffering from prelingual profound congenital sensori-neural hearing loss along with the presence of SMS type II cochleovestibular malformation were studied. Preoperative radiology, surgical difficulties and complication, and postoperative hearing and speech outcomes up to a period of 2 years, using IT-MAIS and SIR scores were noted. Statistical comparison pre- and postimplantation was done using Wilcoxon signed rank test and a p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: In 24 cases, we encountered four cases of SMS type IIa malformation with a smaller modiolus, while the rest 20 were type SMS type IIb with partially defective modiolus. Intraoperatively, CSF leak was observed in 11 patients. Complete electrode insertion and good electrical response (NRT) was detected in all. No facial nerve anomaly was encountered. IT-MAIS and SIR scores increased from a preoperative mean of 5.6 and 1.16-34.56 and 3.88 after 2 years postsurgery, respectively and this difference was found to be statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Our experience with SMS Type II malformations show promising and motivating results with less chances of complications. Proper evaluation and surgical planning preoperatively can lead to an uneventful surgery with good outcomes. A simple and uniform classification system of these anomalies is a must for appropriate prognostication and right decision making.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural , Speech Perception , Cochlea/surgery , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/surgery , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Speech Perception/physiology , Treatment Outcome
2.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 73(3): 333-339, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34471622

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To study and analyse the radiological and surgical findings of 25 cochlear implantees with SMS type-I cochleovestibular malformation and to compare their outcomes in terms of hearing and speech gains pre- and post-operatively. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of cochlear implanted candidates over a period of 8 year from 3 institutions was undertaken and 25 patients suffering from pre-lingual profound congenital sensori-neural hearing loss along with presence of SMS type I cochleovestibular malformation were studied. Pre-operative radiology, surgical difficulties and complication, and post-operative hearing and speech outcomes upto a period of 2 years, using IT-MAIS scores were noted. Statistical comparison pre- and post-implantation was done using Wilcoxon signed rank test and a p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: In 25 cases, we encountered 2 posterior SCC dysplasia, 15 enlarged vestibular aqueducts (LVA), 2 dilated vestibules, 4 superior SCC dysplasia, 2 cases with both posterior and superior SCC dysplasia and of those 1 had a dilated vestibule also. Intra-operatively, CSF leak was observed in 10 patients. Complete electrode insertion and good electrical response (NRT) was detected in all. No facial nerve anomaly was encountered. IT-MAIS scores increased from a pre-operative mean of 4.32 to 34.56 two years post-operatively and this difference was found to be statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Our experience with SMS Type I malformations show promising and motivating results with less chances of complications, similar to implant candidates with normal anatomy. The outcomes in this group of patients are definitely not affected by any malformations in semicircular canals, vestibule or vestibular aqueduct.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...