ABSTRACT
When human bones are found it is important to establish whether they belong to one or more individuals. Osteological examinations assessing morphological characteristics provide an important tool, in particular for a first appraisal. In the reported case, an isolated, toothless mandible that had been found in a river appeared to be too large to match a skull found in the same context. Moreover, shortly before and after the mandible had been found, two headless corpses had been recovered from the same river. The initial conclusion was, therefore, that the mandible and the skull belonged to different individuals. Forensic DNA-testing confirmed, however, that the mandible, the skull, and one of the bodies were from the same individual, who could later be identified through DNA comparison with two biological children. So far, current knowledge has only been that mandibles may erroneously be considered too small by morphological assessment to be compatible with a found skull, as reported in a paper by Reichs (1989). The reported case establishes that the opposite phenomenon may also occur. The findings show that more extensive studies investigating the correlation between mandible and cranial base in a moden population seem to be necessary.
