Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Reprod Med ; 33(7): 608-11, 1988 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3172061

ABSTRACT

One hundred fifty-three closed claims involving perinatal injury or death filed from 1980 through 1982 with the St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company were studied. The claims included were those in which an indemnity was paid or $1,000 or more was expended on the legal defense. Five obstetricians reviewed these cases to identify obstetric and neonatal risk factors. In addition, cases were classified as to the presence or absence of medical negligence. Most of the complications leading to claims arose during labor and delivery. Many claims resulted from the failure to evaluate or treat in a manner consistent with accepted standards of care. Many lacked documentation of the physician's recognition of the risk factors involved. Low Apgar scores at both one and five minutes were the newborn risk factors seen most commonly. In the opinion of the reviewers, medical negligence occurred in 47% of the cases. Indemnity payment occurred with most of the claims judged to be associated with medical negligence. Payment to the claimant was made in a number of cases in which the reviewer thought no malpractice occurred. These results suggest that improvements may be needed in prenatal and perinatal health care as well as in the legal system used to address the problem of perinatal medical negligence.


Subject(s)
Insurance, Liability , Malpractice , Obstetrics , Birth Injuries , Female , Gynecology , Humans , Infant Mortality , Infant, Newborn , Insurance Claim Review , Minnesota , Pregnancy
2.
Am J Perinatol ; 2(4): 320-4, 1985 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-4052185

ABSTRACT

The files of 220 obstetric closed-claim cases were reviewed by five obstetricians to determine whether information could be collected an analyzed to identify common predisposing factors to claims and to suggest preventative measures. The data suggests these cases contain common easily identified obstetric risk factors, most of which occurred in labor and delivery (66%). Fifty-four percent of the risks were recognized, 32% correctly managed, and a high percentage of risks were considered by the reviewers to be directly related to the obstetric outcome leading to the claim (66%). The authors feel obstetric closed claims can be studied and suggestions made to aid obstetricians in providing care. Identification of common obstetric risks and correct management of these risks is poor in these cases. Recognition and management guidelines are imperative in ensuring good obstetric outcome. These two physician-controlled factors played important parts in the majority of cases reviewed. It would appear from this study that obstetric malpractice closed claims are amenable to study; physicians and their patients would benefit from better data collection systems to identify risks in individual pregnancies; physicians need readily available resources to aid their management of patients; only through modification of physician behavior can suits be avoided.


Subject(s)
Malpractice , Obstetrics , Pregnancy Complications , Delivery, Obstetric/methods , Female , Humans , Obstetric Labor Complications , Pregnancy , Puerperal Disorders/prevention & control , Risk , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...