Perceptions and Expectations Regarding the Step 1 Score Change Among Surgical and Non-Surgical Program Directors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

There are currently no studies examining differences in perceptions and expected impact of the Step 1 score change to pass/fail between surgical and non-surgical program directors (PDs). We conducted a systematic review in May 2023 of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and PSYCInfo to evaluate studies examining PDs' perspectives regarding the Step 1 score change. We performed random-effects meta-analyses to determine differences in perspectives among surgical and non-surgical PDs. Surgical PDs (76.8% [95% CI, 72.1%-82.0%], I2 = 52%) reported significantly greater rates of disagreement with the score change compared to non-surgical (65.1% [95% CI, 57.9%-73.1%], I2 = 69.7%) (P = .01). Surgical PDs also reported significantly greater rates of agreement that the score change will increase the difficulty in objectively comparing applicants (88.1% [95% CI, 84.6%-91.7%], I2 = 16.4%), compared to non-surgical (81.0% [95% CI, 75.6%-86.8%], I2 = 72.6%) (P = .04). There was less heterogeneity among non-surgical PDs (88.7% [95% CI, 86.2%-91.2%], I2 = 0%), compared to surgical (84.7% [95% CI, 79.0%-90.8%], I2 = 67.3%), regarding expected increases in emphasis on Step 2, although the difference in rates of agreement was not statistically significant. Overall, there is significant heterogeneity in the literature regarding expected changes in the residency application review process. Most PDs reported significant disagreement with the score change, greater expected difficulty in objectively evaluating applicants, and greater emphasis on Step 2, with surgical PDs reporting greater rates of disagreement, greater expected difficulty, and heterogeneity regarding expected increases in emphasis on Step 2, compared to non-surgical. Additionally, there is significant heterogeneity in the overall literature regarding expected changes in the residency application review process. Further research is needed to establish evidence-based guidelines that improve the overall residency application process for all stakeholders.

Providers' Knowledge and Perceptions of Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review.

Bariatric surgery remains underutilized despite its proven efficacy in the management of obesity. Provider perceptions of bariatric surgery are important to consider when discussing utilization rates. PubMed, SCOPUS, and OVID databases were searched in April 2023, and 40 published studies discussing providers' knowledge and perceptions of bariatric surgery were included. There were generally positive perceptions of the efficacy of bariatric surgery, although overestimations of surgical risks and postoperative complications were common. Providers' previous training was associated with knowledge and perceptions of bariatric surgery and familiarity with perioperative management across studies. These perceptions were also associated with referral rates, suggesting that inadequate provider knowledge may contribute to bariatric surgery underutilization. We advocate for increased bariatric surgery-related education throughout all stages of medical training and across specialties.

Patient and the Public's Perceptions of Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Bariatric surgery is an effective therapeutic modality for obesity and related comorbidities, yet it remains significantly underutilized. Patient perceptions and expectations may influence the decisions of eligible patients in pursuing surgery. METHODS: PubMed, SCOPUS, and OVID databases were searched in July 2022 to identify published studies discussing patient and the public's perceptions of bariatric surgery. RESULTS: The literature shows participants often reported bariatric surgery to be a life-changing intervention known to induce weight loss, improve obesity-related comorbidities, and improve quality of life. However, a significant proportion of survey respondents perceived bariatric surgery as unsafe or risky. Patients belonging to racial minority groups cited higher concern with mortality risk, lower weight loss expectations, and different motivations to pursue bariatric surgery. Female patients were significantly more likely to have more positive perceptions of, and higher expectations of weight loss from, bariatric surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The literature highlighted discordance between patient perceptions and the demonstrated clinical safety and efficacy profile of bariatric surgery. Overestimations of the risks, unrealistic expectations, and unfamiliarity with bariatric surgery outcomes were common findings. These perceptions of bariatric surgery may contribute to its underutilization among eligible patients. Perceptions and motivations often varied by race, region, sex, and age, which demonstrates the necessity of patient-centered education in the prereferral stage. The literature also demonstrated misconceptions of bariatric surgery among the public. Further research should explore the impact of education on the perceptions of patients and the public.

Association of Postoperative Dieting, Exercise, Dietitian, and Surgeon Follow up With Bariatric Surgery Outcomes.

Although postoperative diet modification, exercise, and regular dietitian and surgeon follow-up are often recommended after bariatric surgery (BS), their impact on weight loss is unclear. A Retrospective chart review was conducted for patients who received sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) between August 2000 and November 2017 with telephone follow-up. Multivariable logistic regression models were used for analyses. There were 514 patients included in our study. Most were female (76.3%), mean age was 46.9 years (Standard Deviation [SD] = 11.8), and mean weight loss was 11.6 (SD = 6.5) BMI points at a mean follow-up of 7 years (SD = 4.3). Current surgeon follow-up OR = 2.08 (P < .01) was positively associated with postoperative weight loss, while current dietitian follow-up=OR .41 (P < .01) was negatively associated. Current weight loss supplement use OR = .45 (P = .03) was associated with reduced willingness to undergo surgery again. Increasing preoperative BMI OR = 1.06 (P = .04) and increasing age OR = 1.04 (P = .02) were associated with improved quality of life (QoL) due to BS. Lack of surgeon follow-up and regular dietician consultation was associated with suboptimal weight loss after BS. Older age was positively associated with improved QoL, while current weight loss supplement use was associated with lower likelihood of undergoing surgery again, both independent of weight loss.

History of abuse and bariatric surgery outcomes: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Although there is evidence to support the relationship between abuse history and obesity, the association between abuse history and outcomes after bariatric surgery is not well-established. We aimed to summarize the current literature examining this relationship, as well as provide clinical recommendations to optimize postoperative outcomes. METHODS: PubMed and SCOPUS databases were queried to identify relevant published studies. RESULTS: Overall, 20 studies were included. Rates of the various types of abuse reported in the bariatric surgery population varied widely across studies, as did the methodology used to assess it. The majority of studies found no significant associations between abuse history and postoperative weight loss outcomes. The literature examining the relationship between abuse history and postoperative psychiatric outcomes was less conclusive. CONCLUSIONS: Most current evidence demonstrates that abuse history is not associated with weight loss outcomes after bariatric surgery. Literature on postoperative psychiatric outcomes is mixed, and more robust studies are needed to further investigate the relationship between abuse history and postoperative psychiatric outcomes. Importantly, abuse history should not preclude patients from undergoing bariatric surgery. Of note, patients may benefit from careful monitoring for emotional distress and worsening of psychiatric comorbidities after surgery and psychiatric counseling and treatment when indicated.

Factors Associated With Bariatric Surgery Referral Patterns: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Bariatric surgery (BS) has been shown to effectively treat morbid obesity and improve obesity-related comorbidities. Nonetheless, BS remains underutilized among qualified patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, SCOPUS, and OVID databases were searched to identify published comparative studies examining BS referral patterns. Data on barriers to BS referrals were examined and summarized. RESULTS: Barriers to referrals stemmed largely from a lack of familiarity with safety, efficacy, and postoperative care amongst providers. Providers with previous referrals were more likely to report higher knowledge, comfort in referring patients, and ability to provide postoperative care. Provider initiated discussion of BS was positively associated with referrals. Female and younger patients were more likely to receive referrals. Furthermore, access to appropriate peri-operative resources, local bariatric programs, and insurance eligibility were associated with referral rates. Encouragingly, providers across specialties report eagerness to gain exposure and training in BS. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of provider familiarity with BS efficacy, safety and postoperative care likely contributes to low utilization rates of BS. Further potential barriers in access to BS are logistic factors such as insurance coverage, limited local perioperative resources, and clinic time constraints for patient counseling. Promotion of BS amongst providers and both surgical and non-surgical trainees will likely have a significant impact on referral rates and access to this life-saving procedure. Future studies should further investigate the barriers to BS and delineate the effect size of each barrier on referral rates to efficiently increase access.