sPinal coRd stimulatiOn coMpared with lumbar InStrumEntation for low back pain after previous lumbar decompression (PROMISE): a prospective multicentre RCT.

INTRODUCTION: Persistent spine pain syndrome type 2 (PSPS2) represents a significant burden to the individual and society. Treatment options include revision surgery, stabilisation surgery of the spine, neuromodulation, analgesics and cognitive behavioural therapy. Nevertheless, structured treatment algorithms are missing as high-level evidence on the various treatments is sparse. The aim of this study is to compare higher frequency neuromodulation with instrumentation surgery in patients suffering from PSPS2. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The sPinal coRd stimulatiOn coMpared with lumbar InStrumEntation for low back pain after previous lumbar decompression (PROMISE) trial is a prospective randomised rater blinded multicentre study. Patients suffering from PSPS2 with a functional burden of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) >20 points are randomised to treatment via spinal cord stimulation or spinal instrumentation. Primary outcome is back-related functional outcome according to the ODI 12 months after treatment. Secondary outcomes include pain perception (visual analogue scale), Short Form-36, EuroQOL5D, the amount of analgesics, the length of periprocedural hospitalisation and adverse events. Follow-up visits are planned at 3 and 12 months after treatment. Patients with previous lumbar instrumentation, symptomatic spinal stenosis, radiographical apparent spinal instability or severe psychiatric or systemic comorbidities are excluded from the study. In order to detect a significant difference of ≥10 points (ODI) with a power of 80%, n=72 patients need to be included. The recruitment period will be 24 months with a subsequent 12 months follow-up. The beginning of enrolment is planned for October 2022. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The PROMISE trial is the first randomised rater blinded multicentre study comparing the functional effectiveness of spinal instrumentation versus neuromodulation in patients with PSPS2 in order to achieve high-level evidence for these commonly used treatment options in this severely disabling condition. Patient recruitment will be performed at regular outpatient clinic visits. No further (print, social media) publicity is planned. The study is approved by the local ethics committee (LMU Munich, Germany) and will be conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05466110.

Protective effects of early CD4(+) T cell reduction in hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury.

AIM: CD4(+) T cells contribute to disturbances of liver microcirculation after warm ischemia/reperfusion (I/R). The aim of this study was to investigate a possible protective role of FTY720 (Sphingosine-1 phosphate receptor agonist) in this setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In an in vivo model (42 Wistar rats), ischemia of the left liver lobe was induced for 90 min under anesthesia with xylazine/ketanest. Sham-operated untreated ischemic and treatment group with FTY720 (1 mg/kg body weight intravenous) were investigated. The effect of FTY on I/R injury was assessed by in vivo microscopy 30-90 min after reperfusion (perfusion rate, vessel diameter, leukocyte-endothelial cell interactions, T cell infiltration), by measurement of serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) of interleukin (IL)-2, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-alpha, toll-like receptor 4 (TLR-4), and by histological investigation. RESULTS: After 30 min of reperfusion, the number of T cells in sinusoids was increased four-fold. In the FTY group, the number of T cells was reduced to an half of the number of the ischemia group. Likewise, the number of adherent leukocytes in sinusoids (150.8 +/- 10.9% of s.o.) was reduced in the treatment group (117.3 +/- 12.2%; p < 0.05 vs ischemia), leading to an improvement in perfusion rate in this group (85.0 +/- 4.6% of sham group) compared to nontreated animals (57.5 +/- 10.8%; p < 0.05). According to improved microcirculation, AST/ALT values and histological tissue damage were reduced in the therapy group. RT-PCR revealed an increased expression of IL-2, IL-6, and TLR-4 in the nontreated ischemic group. This expression was clearly reduced in the treatment group. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, FTY720 ameliorates the microcirculatory, biochemical, and histological manifestations of hepatic I/R injury by preventing T cell infiltration. These results indicate that T cells are pivotal mediators in hepatic I/R and may have important implications early after liver transplantation and in warm ischemia.