Coronary Microvascular Disease Assessed by 82-Rubidium Positron Emission Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Is Associated With Small Vessel Disease of the Kidney and Brain.

Background Coronary microvascular disease (CMD) may be part of a systemic small vessel disease that also manifests as neurological impairment and kidney disease. However, clinical evidence supporting a potential link is scarce. We assessed whether CMD is associated with an increased risk of small vessel disease in the kidney and brain. Methods and Results A retrospective multicenter (n=3) study of patients clinically referred to 82-rubidium positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging was conducted between January 2018 and August 2020. Exclusion criterion was reversible perfusion defects >5%. CMD was defined as myocardial flow reserve (MFR) ≤2. The primary outcome, microvascular event, was defined by hospital contact for chronic kidney disease, stroke, or dementia. Among 5122 patients, 51.7% were men, median age 69.0 [interquartile range, 60.0-75.0] years, 11.0% had left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%, and 32.4% had MFR ≤2. MFR was associated with baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate after multivariable adjustment (ß=0.04 [95% CI, 0.03-0.05]; P<0.001). During a median follow-up of 3.05 years, 383 (7.5%) patients suffered an event (253 cerebral and 130 renal), more frequently in patients with MFR ≤2 versus MFR >2 (11.6% versus 5.5%, P<0.001). MFR ≤2 was associated to outcome with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.30 (95% CI, 1.88-2.81, P<0.001) and an adjusted HR of 1.62 (95% CI, 1.32-2.00, P<0.001). Results were consistent across subgroups defined by presence of irreversible perfusion defects, estimated glomerular filtration rate, diabetes, left ventricular ejection fraction, and previous revascularization. Conclusions This is the first large-scale cohort study to link CMD to microvascular events in the kidney and brain. Data support the hypothesis that CMD is part of a systemic vascular disorder.

Effectiveness of Home-Based Mobile Guided Cardiac Rehabilitation as Alternative Strategy for Nonparticipation in Clinic-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Among Elderly Patients in Europe: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Although nonparticipation in cardiac rehabilitation is known to increase cardiovascular mortality and hospital readmissions, more than half of patients with coronary artery disease in Europe are not participating in cardiac rehabilitation. Objective: To assess whether a 6-month guided mobile cardiac rehabilitation (MCR) program is an effective therapy for elderly patients who decline participation in cardiac rehabilitation. Design, Setting, and Participants: Patients were enrolled in this parallel multicenter randomized clinical trial from November 11, 2015, to January 3, 2018, and follow-up was completed on January 17, 2019, in a secondary care system with 6 cardiac institutions across 5 European countries. Researchers assessing primary outcome were masked for group assignment. A total of 4236 patients were identified with a recent diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome, coronary revascularization, or surgical or percutaneous treatment for valvular disease, or documented coronary artery disease, of whom 996 declined to start cardiac rehabilitation. Subsequently, 179 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria consented to participate in the European Study on Effectiveness and Sustainability of Current Cardiac Rehabilitation Programmes in the Elderly trial. Data were analyzed from January 21 to October 11, 2019. Interventions: Six months of home-based cardiac rehabilitation with telemonitoring and coaching based on motivational interviewing was used to stimulate patients to reach exercise goals. Control patients did not receive any form of cardiac rehabilitation throughout the study period. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome parameter was peak oxygen uptake (Vo2peak) after 6 months. Results: Among 179 patients randomized (145 male [81%]; median age, 72 [range, 65-87] years), 159 (89%) were eligible for primary end point analysis. Follow-up at 1 year was completed for 151 patients (84%). Peak oxygen uptake improved in the MCR group (n = 89) at 6 and 12 months (1.6 [95% CI, 0.9-2.4] mL/kg-1/min-1 and 1.2 [95% CI, 0.4-2.0] mL/kg-1/min-1, respectively), whereas there was no improvement in the control group (n = 90) (+0.2 [95% CI, -0.4 to 0.8] mL/kg-1/min-1 and +0.1 [95% CI, -0.5 to 0.7] mL/kg-1/min-1, respectively). Changes in Vo2peak were greater in the MCR vs control groups at 6 months (+1.2 [95% CI, 0.2 to 2.1] mL/kg-1/min-1) and 12 months (+0.9 [95% CI, 0.05 to 1.8] mL/kg-1/min-1). The incidence of adverse events was low and did not differ between the MCR and control groups. Conclusions and Relevance: These results suggest that a 6-month home-based MCR program for patients 65 years or older with coronary artery disease or a valvular intervention was safe and beneficial in improving Vo2peak when compared with no cardiac rehabilitation. Trial Registration: trialregister.nl Identifier: NL5168.

[Sudden cardiac death among young athletes--should we screen?]. / Pludselig uventet hjertedød hos yngre idraetsudøvere--skal der screenes?

Sudden death involving athletes is always tragic and receives widespread public attention. The European Society of Cardiology has proposed cardiovascular screening of young competitive athletes. A report from the Danish Society of Cardiology recently concluded that screening cannot be recommended in Denmark at present. This conclusion was based mainly on inadequate documentation of the effect of screening and on considerations regarding cost-effectiveness. We recommend other prophylactic measures and further research on this issue.