Saccadic adaptation shapes perceived size: Common codes for action and perception.

Recent findings suggest that perceptual and motor systems share common codes; for instance, perceived object location is known to correlate with motor changes in the oculomotor system. Here, we investigate whether modifying saccade amplitude affects object size perception. Participants saw in peripheral vision a test disk that could vary in size across trials. This disk was then replaced by a small target cross, which was the signal to make a saccade. After the saccade, the target cross was extinguished and replaced by a reference disk (thus seen in foveal vision). Participants had to compare the post- to the pre-saccade disk sizes. Psychometric functions were obtained before and after one session of 142 saccades made toward the cross that either stepped toward the fixation point during the saccade (backward adaptation group) or remained stationary (control group). In the experimental group, stepping the target cross toward fixation during saccades decreased movement amplitude, a phenomenon called saccadic adaptation. We observed a concurrent shift in the psychometric functions reflecting a decrease in perceived object size. Such a perceptual modification did not occur in the control group. Our results reveal that motor changes co-occur with changes in perceived object size. Unlike previous studies evaluating the impact of saccadic adaptation on perceived location, we measured here the perception of another spatial feature (the object size) that is not relevant for the sensorimotor transformation. Theoretical implications of the strong links between oculomotor parameters and object perception are discussed.

Time dependency of the SNARC effect for different number formats: evidence from saccadic responses.

In line with the suggestion that the strength of the spatial numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect was time dependent, the aim of the present study was to assess whether the association strength depends on the processing time of numerical quantity and/or of the time to initiate responses. More specifically, we examined whether and how the SNARC effect could be modulated by number format and effector type. Experiment 1 compared the effect induced by Arabic numbers and number words on the basis of saccadic responses in a parity judgment task. Indeed, previous studies have shown that Arabic numbers lead to faster processing than number words. The results replicated the SNARC effect with Arabic numbers, but not with number words. Experiment 2 was similar to Experiment 1, but this time manual responses (i.e., responses far slower than saccadic ones) were recorded. A strong SNARC effect was observed for both number formats. Further analyses revealed a correlation between mean individual response times and the strength of the SNARC effect. We proposed that the initiation times for saccadic responses may be too short for the SNARC effect to appear, in particular with the written number format for which activation of magnitude takes time. We conclude in terms of time variations resulting from processing specificities related with number format, effector type and also individual reaction and processing speed.