Non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory viral detection and whole genome sequencing from COVID-19 rapid antigen test devices: a laboratory evaluation study.

BACKGROUND: There has been high uptake of rapid antigen test device use for point-of-care COVID-19 diagnosis. Individuals who are symptomatic but test negative on COVID-19 rapid antigen test devices might have a different respiratory viral infection. We aimed to detect and sequence non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory viruses from rapid antigen test devices, which could assist in the characterisation and surveillance of circulating respiratory viruses in the community. METHODS: We applied archival clinical nose and throat swabs collected between Jan 1, 2015, and Dec 31, 2022, that previously tested positive for a common respiratory virus (adenovirus, influenza, metapneumovirus, parainfluenza, rhinovirus, respiratory syncytial virus [RSV], or seasonal coronavirus; 132 swabs and 140 viral targets) on PCR to two commercially available COVID-19 rapid antigen test devices, the Panbio COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device and Roche SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Self-Test. In addition, we collected 31 COVID-19 rapid antigen test devices used to test patients who were symptomatic at The Royal Melbourne Hospital emergency department in Melbourne, Australia. We extracted total nucleic acid from the device paper test strips and assessed viral recovery using multiplex real-time PCR (rtPCR) and capture-based whole genome sequencing. Sequence and genome data were analysed through custom computational pipelines, including subtyping. FINDINGS: Of the 140 respiratory viral targets from archival samples, 89 (64%) and 88 (63%) were positive on rtPCR for the relevant taxa following extraction from Panbio or Roche rapid antigen test devices, respectively. Recovery was variable across taxa: we detected influenza A in nine of 18 samples from Panbio and seven of 18 from Roche devices; parainfluenza in 11 of 20 samples from Panbio and 12 of 20 from Roche devices; human metapneumovirus in 11 of 16 from Panbio and 14 of 16 from Roche devices; seasonal coronavirus in eight of 19 from Panbio and two of 19 from Roche devices; rhinovirus in 24 of 28 from Panbio and 27 of 28 from Roche devices; influenza B in four of 15 in both devices; and RSV in 16 of 18 in both devices. Of the 31 COVID-19 devices collected from The Royal Melbourne Hospital emergency department, 11 tested positive for a respiratory virus on rtPCR, including one device positive for influenza A virus, one positive for RSV, four positive for rhinovirus, and five positive for SARS-CoV-2. Sequences of target respiratory viruses from archival samples were detected in 55 (98·2%) of 56 samples from Panbio and 48 (85·7%) of 56 from Roche rapid antigen test devices. 98 (87·5%) of 112 viral genomes were completely assembled from these data, enabling subtyping for RSV and influenza viruses. All 11 samples collected from the emergency department had viral sequences detected, with near-complete genomes assembled for influenza A and RSV. INTERPRETATION: Non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory viruses can be detected and sequenced from COVID-19 rapid antigen devices. Recovery of near full-length viral sequences from these devices provides a valuable opportunity to expand genomic surveillance programmes for public health monitoring of circulating respiratory viruses. FUNDING: Australian Government Medical Research Future Fund and Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.

Evaluating preanalytical sample storage parameters for nucleic acid-based detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

OBJECTIVES: To ensure accurate diagnosis of infectious diseases, preanalytical factors should be considered when assessing specimen quality and subsequent test result. Accordingly, we aimed to systematically assess the effect of storage time, temperature and buffer on the analytical sensitivity of detecting the sexually transmitted pathogen, Neisseria gonorrhoeae across multiple molecular diagnostic platforms. METHODS: Cultured N. gonorrhoeae was spiked into generic and commercial storage buffers and stored at four temperatures and five time points, ranging from -20°C to 37°C, over 30 days. Samples were processed using the Alinity m STI, Xpert CT/NG and Aptima Combo 2 nucleic acid amplification assays and an in-house quantitative PCR assay. A reduction in analytical sensitivity was defined as a significant (p<0.05) increase in cycle threshold (Ct) value relative to control samples. RESULTS: In total, 2756 samples were processed, with N. gonorrhoeae detected in 99.2% of samples. With respect to time, analytical sensitivity was maintained from day 2 (113/120; 94.2%) up to day 30 (110/120; 91.7%) relative to baseline samples. With respect to temperature, analytical sensitivity was maintained from -20°C (147/150; 98.0%) up to 37°C (136/150; 90.7%) relative to baseline samples. Generic buffers, Viral Transport Medium and Amies Liquid Media showed a reduction in analytical sensitivity compared with their commercial counterparts, Aptima Multitest Swab Transport Media and Abbott Alinity transport buffer using select diagnostic assays; this reduction appeared temperature dependent, with the largest differences in median Ct values observed at 37°C (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Increased prevalence of sample self-collection for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) warrants an evaluation of preanalytical sample storage variables on diagnostic testing performance. Here, across a range of time points, temperatures and storage buffers, N. gonorrhoeae was successfully detected, supporting flexibility in sample storage, and by extension the feasibility of analysing self-collected samples to improve access to STI testing.

Use of a point-of-care test to rapidly assess levels of SARS-CoV-2 nasal neutralising antibodies in vaccines and breakthrough infected individuals.

Despite SARS-CoV-2 vaccines eliciting systemic neutralising antibodies (nAbs), breakthrough infections still regularly occur. Infection helps to generate mucosal immunity, possibly reducing disease transmission. Monitoring mucosal nAbs is predominantly restricted to lab-based assays, which have limited application to the public. In this multi-site study, we used lateral-flow surrogate neutralisation tests to measure mucosal and systemic nAbs in vaccinated and breakthrough infected individuals in Australia and Singapore. Using three lateral flow assays to detect SARS-CoV-2 nAbs, we demonstrated that nasal mucosal nAbs were present in 71.4 (95% CI 56.3-82.9%) to 85.7% (95% CI 71.8-93.7%) of individuals with breakthrough infection (positivity rate was dependent upon the type of test), whereas only 20.7 (95% CI 17.1-49.4%) to 34.5% (95% CI 19.8-52.7%) of vaccinated individuals without breakthrough infection had detectible nasal mucosal nAbs. Of the individuals with breakthrough infection, collective mucosal anti-S antibody detection in confirmatory assays was 92.9% (95% CI 80.3-98.2%) of samples, while 72.4% (95% CI 54.1-85.5%) of the vaccinated individuals who had not experienced a breakthrough infection were positive to anti-S antibody. All breakthrough infected individuals produced systemic anti-N antibodies; however, these antibodies were not detected in the nasal cavity. Mucosal immunity is likely to play a role in limiting the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and lateral flow neutralisation tests provide a rapid readout of mucosal nAbs at the point-of-care.

Rapid detection of monkeypox virus using a CRISPR-Cas12a mediated assay: a laboratory validation and evaluation study.

BACKGROUND: The 2022 outbreak of mpox (formerly known as monkeypox) led to the spread of monkeypox virus (MPXV) in over 110 countries, demanding effective disease management and surveillance. As current diagnostics rely largely on centralised laboratory testing, our objective was to develop a simple rapid point-of-care assay to detect MPXV in clinical samples using isothermal amplification coupled with CRISPR and CRISPR-associated protein (Cas) technology. METHODS: In this proof-of-concept study, we developed a portable isothermal amplification CRISPR-Cas12a-based assay for the detection of MPXV. We designed a panel of 22 primer-guide RNA sets using pangenome and gene-agnostic approaches, and subsequently shortlisted the three sets producing the strongest signals for evaluation of analytical sensitivity and specificity using a fluorescence-based readout. The set displaying 100% specificity and the lowest limit of detection (LOD) was selected for further assay validation using both a fluorescence-based and lateral-flow readout. Assay specificity was confirmed using a panel of viral and bacterial pathogens. Finally, we did a blind concordance study on genomic DNA extracted from 185 clinical samples, comparing assay results with a gold-standard quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay. We identified the optimal time to detection and analysed the performance of the assay relative to qPCR using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. We also assessed the compatibility with lateral-flow strips, both visually and computationally, where strips were interpreted blinded to the fluorescence results on the basis of the presence or absence of test bands. FINDINGS: With an optimal run duration of approximately 45 min from isothermal amplification to CRISPR-assay readout, the MPXV recombinase polymerase amplification CRISPR-Cas12a-based assay with the selected primer-guide set had an LOD of 1 copy per µL and 100% specificity against tested viral pathogens. Blinded concordance testing of 185 clinical samples resulted in 100% sensitivity (95% CI 89·3-100) and 99·3% specificity (95% CI 95·7-100) using the fluorescence readout. For optimal time to detection by fluorescence readout, we estimated the areas under the ROC curve to be 0·98 at 2 min and 0·99 at 4 min. Lateral-flow strips had 100% sensitivity (89·3-100) and 98·6% specificity (94·7-100) with both visual and computational assessment. Overall, lateral-flow results were highly concordant with fluorescence-based readouts (179 of 185 tests, 96·8% concordant), with discrepancies associated with low viral load samples. INTERPRETATION: Our assay for the diagnosis of mpox displayed good performance characteristics compared with qPCR. Although optimisation of the assay will be required before deployment, its usability and versatility present a potential solution to MPXV detection in low-resource and remote settings, as well as a means of community-based, on-site testing. FUNDING: Victorian Medical Research Accelerator Fund and the Australian Government Department of Health.

Feasibility of a refurbished shipping container as a transportable laboratory for rapid SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics.

Background: Australia's response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic relies on widespread availability of rapid, accurate testing and reporting of results to facilitate contact tracing. The extensive geographical area of Australia presents a logistical challenge, with many of the population located distant from a laboratory capable of robust severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection. A strategy to address this is the deployment of a mobile facility utilizing novel diagnostic platforms. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a fully contained transportable SARS-CoV-2 testing laboratory using a range of rapid point-of-care tests. Method: A 20 ft (6.1 m) shipping container was refurbished (GeneWorks, Adelaide, South Australia) with climate controls, laboratory benches, hand-wash station and a class II biosafety cabinet. Portable marquees situated adjacent to the container served as stations for registration, sample acquisition and personal protective equipment for staff. Specimens were collected and tested on-site utilizing either the Abbott ID NOW or Abbott Panbio rapid tests. SARS-CoV-2 positive results from the rapid platforms or any participants reporting symptoms consistent with COVID-19 were tested on-site by GeneXpert Xpress RT-PCR. All samples were tested in parallel with a standard-of-care RT-PCR test (Panther Fusion SARS-CoV-2 assay) performed at the public health reference laboratory. In-laboratory environmental conditions and data management-related factors were also recorded. Results: Over a 3 week period, 415 participants were recruited for point-of-care SARS-CoV-2 testing. From time of enrolment, the median result turnaround time was 26 min for the Abbott ID NOW, 32 min for the Abbott Panbio and 75 min for the Xpert Xpress. The environmental conditions of the refurbished shipping container were found to be suitable for all platforms tested, although humidity may have produced condensation within the container. Available software enabled turnaround times to be recorded, although technical malfunction resulted in incomplete data capture. Conclusion: Transportable container laboratories can enable rapid COVID-19 results at the point of care and may be useful during outbreak settings, particularly in environments that are physically distant from centralized laboratories. They may also be appropriate in resource-limited settings. The results of this pilot study confirm feasibility, although larger trials to validate individual rapid point-of-care testing platforms in this environment are required.

Surveillance testing using salivary RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 in managed quarantine facilities in Australia: A laboratory validation and implementation study.

Background: Regular repeat surveillance testing is a strategy to identify asymptomatic individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infections in high-risk work settings to prevent onward community transmission. Saliva sampling is less invasive compared to nasal/oropharyngeal sampling, thus making it suitable for regular testing. In this multi-centre evaluation, we aimed to validate RT-PCR using salivary swab testing of SARS-CoV-2 for large-scale surveillance testing and assess implementation amongst staff working in the hotel quarantine system in Victoria, Australia. Methods: A multi-centre laboratory evaluation study was conducted to systematically validate the in vitro and clinical performance of salivary swab RT-PCR for implementation of SARS-CoV-2 surveillance testing. Analytical sensitivity for multiple RT-PCR platforms was assessed using a dilution series of known SARS-CoV-2 viral loads, and assay specificity was examined using a panel of viral pathogens other than SARS-CoV-2. In addition, we tested capacity for large-scale saliva testing using a four-sample pooling approach, where positive pools were subsequently decoupled and retested. Regular, frequent self-collected saliva swab RT-PCR testing was implemented for staff across fourteen quarantine hotels. Samples were tested at three diagnostic laboratories validated in this study, and results were provided back to staff in real-time. Findings: The agreement of self-collected saliva swabs for RT-PCR was 84.5% (95% CI 68.6 to 93.8) compared to RT-PCR using nasal/oropharyngeal swab samples collected by a healthcare practitioner, when saliva samples were collected within seven days of symptom onset. Between 7th December 2020 and 17th December 2021, almost 500,000 RT-PCR tests were performed on saliva swabs self-collected by 102 staff working in quarantine hotels in Melbourne. Of these, 20 positive saliva swabs were produced by 13 staff (0.004%). The majority of staff that tested positive occurred during periods of community transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant. Interpretation: Salivary RT-PCR had an acceptable level of agreement compared to standard nasal/oropharyngeal swab RT-PCR within early symptom onset. The scalability, tolerability and ease of self-collection highlights utility for frequent or repeated testing in high-risk settings, such as quarantine or healthcare environments where regular monitoring of staff is critical for public health, and protection of vulnerable populations. Funding: This work was funded by the Victorian Department of Health.

Characterisation of Treponema pallidum lineages within the contemporary syphilis outbreak in Australia: a genomic epidemiological analysis.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of syphilis has increased markedly in the past decade in high-income countries, including Australia. To date, however, genomic studies of Treponema pallidum have focused mainly on the northern hemisphere. Here, we aimed to characterise the lineages of T pallidum driving the current syphilis epidemic in Australia. METHODS: In this genomic epidemiological analysis, using phylogenomic and phylodynamic analyses, we analysed 456 high-quality T pallidum genomes collected from clinical samples in Australia between Oct 19, 2005, and Dec 31, 2020, and contextualised this information with publicly available sequence data. We also performed detailed genomic characterisation of putative antimicrobial resistance determinants, in addition to correlating single-locus typing of the TP0548 allele with the T pallidum phylogeny. FINDINGS: Phylogenomic analyses identified four major sublineages circulating in Australia and globally, two belonging to the SS14 lineage, and two belonging to the Nichols lineage. Australian sublineages were further delineated into twelve subgroups, with five of the six largest subgroups associated with men who have sex with men, and the sixth lineage was predominantly associated with heterosexual people. Most Australian T pallidum genomes (398 [87%] of 456) were genotypically macrolide resistant, and TP0548 typing correlated significantly with T pallidum genomic subgroups. INTERPRETATION: These findings show that the current syphilis epidemic in Australia is driven by multiple lineages of T pallidum, rather than one distinct outbreak. Major subgroups of T pallidum in Australia have emerged within the past 30 years, are closely related to global lineages, and circulate across different sexual networks. In conjunction with improved testing and treatment, these data could better inform the control of syphilis in Australia. FUNDING: National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian Research Council.

Identification of novel bioactive compounds from Olea europaea by evaluation of chemical compounds in the OliveNet™ library: in silico bioactivity and molecular modelling, and in vitro validation of hERG activity.

BACKGROUND: As highlighted in the OliveNet™ library, Olea europaea consists of a diverse collection of chemical compounds. We have classified over 600 compounds into 13 main classes and 47 subclasses. Various compounds, including oleuropein and hydroxytyrosol, have been investigated for their potential beneficial effects in multiple human pathologies. However, the vast majority of compounds remain largely unexplored and approximately 50% are currently non-commercially available. METHOD: Here, we utilise conventional software to characterise the absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity profile of OliveNet™ compounds. Molecular docking was performed for assessment of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibition and interactions with the human ether-à-go-go-related gene (hERG) channel. Potential hERG ion channel inhibition was calibrated using in vitro patch clamp assays and steered molecular dynamics (SMD) simulations were used to examine membrane permeability of a subset of compounds. RESULTS: Our findings indicated that 313 out of 675 olive compounds were predicted to be absorbed by the gastrointestinal tract. Hydroxytyrosol required the least amount of force to pass through the lipid bilayer compared to elenolic acid diglucoside in SMD simulations. Based on the ADMET and molecular docking data, the hERG inhibitory activities of verbascoside, oleuropein, and hydroxytyrosol were investigated using patch clamp assays and they were identified as non-inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: While the favourable properties of well-known compounds were confirmed, we identified oleuropein aglycone decarboxymethyl dialdehyde acetal form, decarboxymethyl elenolic acid dialdehyde, acetal of decarboxymethyl elenolic acid dialdehyde, methyl malate-ß-hydroxytyrosol ester, hydroxytyrosil elenolate, D-(+)-erythro-1-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxy)-214-phenyl-1,2,3-propantriol, (+)-1-acetoxypinoresinol-4″-O-methyl ether, and 3-[1-(hydroxymethyl)-(E)-1-propenyl] glutaric acid as potential candidates for synthesis and further evaluation.