Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cell Cycle ; 6(2): 131-5, 2007 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17245130

ABSTRACT

Until recently, the connection between aging and DNA repair has rested on two classes of observation. First, DNA damage and unrepaired double-strand breaks (DSBs) accumulate with age. Second, several defects in DNA repair genes are associated with early onset of age-related diseases and other signs of premature aging. Now, a third link has emerged: The mechanisms by which cells repair DSB damage can change dramatically with age, shifting from simpler end-joining processes in younger organisms to homologous mechanisms in which missing genetic information is restored through use of a template. So far this third link between aging and DNA repair has only been observed in a small number of experimental systems, and cannot yet claim the generality of the other two. Here we review the evidence for this phenomenon and present new data testing models for the underlying causes. If the generality of age-related changes in DSB repair pathway usage can be established, it will provide a new insight into the underlying molecular basis of aging and how evolution has shaped these processes.


Subject(s)
Aging/genetics , DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded , DNA Repair/genetics , Animals , Cellular Senescence/genetics , DNA Damage/genetics , DNA Replication/physiology , Humans
2.
Curr Biol ; 16(20): 2009-15, 2006 Oct 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17055979

ABSTRACT

A DNA double-strand break (DSB) can be repaired by any of several alternative and competing mechanisms. The repaired sequences often differ from the original depending on which mechanism was used so that the cell's "choice" of repair mechanism can have profound genetic consequences. DSBs can accumulate with age , and human diseases that mimic some of the effects of aging, such as increased susceptibility to cancer, are associated with certain defects in DSB repair . The premeiotic germ cells of Drosophila provide a useful model for exploration of the connection between aging and DNA repair because these cells are subject to mortality and other age-related changes , and their DNA repair process is easily quantified. We used Rr3, a repair reporter system in Drosophila, to show that the relative usage of DSB repair mechanisms can change substantially as an organism ages. Homologous repair increased linearly in the male germline from 14% in young individuals to more than 60% in old ones, whereas two other pathways showed a corresponding decrease. Furthermore, the proportion of longer conversion tracts (>156 bp) also increased nearly 2-fold as the flies aged. These findings are relevant to the more general question of how DNA damage and repair are related to aging.


Subject(s)
Aging/genetics , DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded , DNA Repair/physiology , Age Factors , Aging/physiology , Animals , Crosses, Genetic , Drosophila , Electrophoresis, Agar Gel , Endodeoxyribonucleases/metabolism , Female , Male , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Spermatogonia/physiology
3.
Genetics ; 172(2): 1055-68, 2006 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16299390

ABSTRACT

Double-strand DNA breaks can be repaired by any of several alternative mechanisms that differ greatly in the nature of the final repaired products. We used a reporter construct, designated "Repair reporter 3" (Rr3), to measure the relative usage of these pathways in Drosophila germ cells. The method works by creating a double-strand break at a specific location such that expression of the red fluorescent protein, DsRed, in the next generation can be used to infer the frequency at which each pathway was used. A key feature of this approach is that most data come from phenotypic scoring, thus allowing large sample sizes and considerable precision in measurements. Specifically, we measured the proportion of breaks repaired by (1) conversion repair, (2) nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), or (3) single-strand annealing (SSA). For conversion repair, the frequency of mitotic crossing over in the germ line indicates the relative prevalence of repair by double Holliday junction (DHJ) formation vs. the synthesis-dependent strand annealing (SDSA) pathway. We used this method to show that breaks occurring early in germ-line development were much more frequently repaired via single-strand annealing and much less likely to be repaired by end joining compared with identical breaks occurring later in development. Conversion repair was relatively rare when breaks were made either very early or very late in development, but was much more frequent in between. Significantly, the changes in relative usage occurred in a compensatory fashion, such that an increase in one pathway was accompanied by decreases in others. This negative correlation is interpreted to mean that the pathways for double-strand break repair compete with each other to handle a given breakage event.


Subject(s)
DNA Damage/physiology , DNA Repair/physiology , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Signal Transduction/genetics , Animals , Animals, Genetically Modified , Crosses, Genetic , DNA, Cruciform/physiology , Female , Genes, Reporter , Luminescent Proteins/genetics , Male
4.
Genetics ; 161(2): 711-20, 2002 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12072467

ABSTRACT

We show evidence that DNA double-strand breaks induced in the Drosophila germ line can be repaired very efficiently by the single-strand annealing (SSA) mechanism. A double-strand break was made between two copies of a 1290-bp direct repeat by mobilizing a P transposon. In >80% of the progeny that acquired this chromosome, repair resulted in loss of the P element and loss of one copy of the repeat, as observed in SSA. The frequency of this repair was much greater than seen for gene conversion using an allelic template, which is only approximately 7%. A similar structure, but with a smaller duplication of only 158 bp, also yielded SSA-like repair events, but at a reduced frequency, and gave rise to some products by repair pathways other than SSA. The 1290-bp repeats carried two sequence polymorphisms that were examined in the products. The allele nearest to a nick in the putative heteroduplex intermediate was lost most often. This bias is predicted by the SSA model, although other models could account for it. We conclude that SSA is the preferred repair pathway in Drosophila for DNA breaks between sequence repeats, and it competes with gene conversion by the synthesis-dependent strand annealing (SDSA) pathway.


Subject(s)
DNA Repair , Drosophila/genetics , Animals , DNA Transposable Elements , Gene Duplication , Molecular Sequence Data , Polymorphism, Genetic , Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...