Safety and efficacy of the 0 h/3 h protocol for rapid rule out of myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: The early and accurate diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is an important medical and economic challenge. We aimed to prospectively evaluate the performance of the new European Society of Cardiology rapid 0-hour/3-hour (0 h/3 h) rule out protocol for AMI. METHODS: We enrolled 2,727 consecutive patients presenting with suspected AMI without persistent ST-segment elevation to the emergency department in a prospective international multicenter study. The final diagnosis was adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists. The performance of the 0 h/3 h rule out protocol was evaluated using 4 high-sensitivity (primary analysis) and 3 sensitive cardiac troponin (cTn) assays. RESULTS: Acute myocardial infarction was the final diagnosis in 473 patients (17.3%). Using the 4 high-sensitivity cTn assays, the 0-hour rule out protocol correctly ruled out 99.8% (95% [confidence interval] CI, 98.7%-100%), 99.6% (95% CI, 98.5%-99.9%), 100% (95% CI, 97.9%-100%), and 100% (95% CI, 98.0%-100%) of late presenters (>6 h from chest pain onset). The 3-hour rule out protocol correctly ruled out 99.9% (95% CI, 99.1%-100%), 99.5% (95% CI, 98.3%-99.9%), 100% (95% CI, 98.1%-100%), and 100% (95% CI, 98.2%-100%) of early presenters (<6 h from chest pain onset). Using the 3 sensitive cTn assays, the 0-hour rule out protocol correctly ruled out 99.6% (95% CI, 98.6%-99.9%), 99.0% (95% CI, 96.9%-99.7%), and 99.1% (95% CI, 97.2%-99.8%) of late presenters; and the 3-hour rule out protocol correctly ruled out 99.4% (95% CI, 98.3%-99.8%), 99.2% (95% CI, 97.3%-99.8%), and 99.0% (95% CI, 97.2%-99.7%) of early presenters. Overall, the 0 h/3 h rule out protocol assigned 40% to 60% of patients to rule out. None of the patients assigned rule out died during 3-months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The 0 h/3 h rule out protocol seems to allow the accurate rule out of AMI using both high-sensitivity and sensitive cTn measurements in conjunction with clinical assessment. Additional studies are warranted for external validation.

Incremental value of a single high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I measurement to rule out myocardial ischemia.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the value of a novel high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I measurement to rule out exercise-induced myocardial ischemia in patients without known coronary artery disease. METHODS: We included 714 patients without previously known coronary artery disease who were referred for rest/stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission tomography. All clinical information available to the treating cardiologist was used to quantify the clinical judgment regarding the presence of exercise-induced myocardial ischemia using a visual analogue scale twice: once before and once after bicycle exercise stress testing. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I measurements were obtained before stress testing in a blinded manner. The presence of exercise-induced myocardial ischemia was adjudicated on the basis of myocardial perfusion single photon emission tomography combined with coronary angiography findings. RESULTS: Exercise-induced myocardial ischemia was detected in 167 participants (23.4%). High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I levels were significantly higher in patients with exercise-induced myocardial ischemia (4.0 ng/L [95% confidence interval, 2.8-8.6] vs 2.6 ng/L [95% confidence interval, 1.8-4.1], P < .001) and remained an independent predictor of ischemia in multivariable analysis (P < .001). Combining clinical judgment before exercise testing with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I levels increased diagnostic accuracy as quantified by the area under the receiver operating curve from 0.64 to 0.73 (P < .001), which also tended to be superior to clinical judgment after exercise testing (0.69, P = .056). A single resting high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I measurement provided similar diagnostic accuracy as integrated clinical judgment after exercise testing including work load, as well as symptoms and electrocardiogram changes (0.70 vs 0.69, P = not significant). CONCLUSIONS: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I measurements seem to complement noninvasive clinical assessment in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.