Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 58(4): 478-86, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24571536

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The nine equivalents of nursing manpower use score (NEMS) is used to evaluate critical care nursing workload and occasionally to define hospital reimbursements. Little is known about the caregivers' accuracy in scoring, about factors affecting this accuracy and how validity of scoring is assured. METHODS: Accuracy in NEMS scoring of Swiss critical care nurses was assessed using case vignettes. An online survey was performed to assess training and quality control of NEMS scoring and to collect structural and organizational data of participating intensive care units (ICUs). Aggregated structural and procedural data of the Swiss ICU Minimal Data Set were used for matching. RESULTS: Nursing staff from 64 (82%) of the 78 certified adult ICUs participated in this survey. Training and quality control of scoring shows large variability between ICUs. A total of 1378 nurses scored one out of 20 case vignettes: accuracy ranged from 63.7% (intravenous medications) to 99.1% (basic monitoring). Erroneous scoring (8.7% of all items) was more frequent than omitted scoring (3.2%). Mean NEMS per case was 28.0 ± 11.8 points (reference score: 25.7 ± 14.2 points). Mean bias was 2.8 points (95% confidence interval: 1.0-4.7); scores below 37.1 points were generally overestimated. Data from units with a greater nursing management staff showed a higher bias. CONCLUSION: Overall, nurses assess the NEMS score within a clinically acceptable range. Lower scores are generally overestimated. Inaccurate assessment was associated with a greater size of the nursing management staff. Swiss head nurses consider themselves motivated to assure appropriate scoring and its validation.


Subject(s)
Critical Care , Intensive Care Units , Nurses/supply & distribution , Adult , Critical Care/standards , Critical Care/statistics & numerical data , Data Collection , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units/standards , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , Nurses/statistics & numerical data , Nursing Staff, Hospital , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Quality Control , Sex Distribution , Switzerland , Workforce
2.
Qual Saf Health Care ; 18(3): 205-8, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19468003

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Limited information exists in regard to drug omissions and unjustified medications in the hospital discharge summary (DS). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence and types of drug omissions and unjustified medications in the DS, and to assess their potential impact on patient health. METHODS: A prospective observational review of the DSs of all patients discharged from our Internal Medicine Department over a 3-month period. Data assessment was made by internists using a structured form. RESULTS: Of the 577 evaluated DSs, 66% contained at least one inconsistency accounting for a total of 1012 irregularities. There were 393 drug omissions affecting 251 patients, 32% of which were potentially harmful. Seventeen per cent of all medications (619/3691) were unjustified, affecting 318 patients. The unjustified medication was potentially harmful in 16% of cases, occurred significantly more frequent in women than in men (61% vs 50%; p = 0.008) and increased linearly with the number of drugs prescribed (p<0.001). Drug omission had a twofold higher potential to cause harm than unjustified medication. CONCLUSIONS: Drug omissions and unjustified medications are frequent, and systemic changes are required to substantially reduce these inconsistencies.


Subject(s)
Medical Records/standards , Medication Errors , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , Prescription Drugs , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Switzerland
3.
Praxis (Bern 1994) ; 96(13): 495-8, 2007 Mar 28.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17432296

ABSTRACT

We present the case of a 74-years old man with subtotal gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma, whose postoperative course is complicated by a prolonged fever. Despite extensive diagnostics, the origin of the postoperative fever remains unexplained for 47 days, when the patient is transferred to the ICU because of lethargy, hemodynamic instability, lung edema and abdominal symptoms. The diagnosis of Addison crisis is established and under substitution with hydrocortisone all the symptoms rapidly resolve. Postoperative fever is relatively frequent and infectious causes account for about half of the cases only. An infectious origin has imperatively to be excluded when the fever arises later than 48 hrs after surgery. In case of prolonged fever we suggest to extend the differential diagnosis to other than infectious causes by means of special lists (e.g fever of unknown origin).


Subject(s)
Addison Disease/diagnosis , Fever of Unknown Origin/etiology , Postoperative Complications , Acute Disease , Addison Disease/complications , Addison Disease/drug therapy , Aged , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Hydrocortisone/administration & dosage , Hydrocortisone/therapeutic use , Male , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...