IC14, an anti-CD14 antibody, inhibits endotoxin-mediated symptoms and inflammatory responses in humans.

CD14 is a receptor for cell wall components of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria that has been implicated in the initiation of the inflammatory response to sepsis. To determine the role of CD14 in LPS-induced effects in humans, 16 healthy subjects received an i.v. injection of LPS (4 ng/kg) preceded (-2 h) by i.v. IC14, a recombinant chimeric mAb against human CD14, at a dose of 1 mg/kg over 1 h, or placebo. In subjects receiving IC14, saturation of CD14 on circulating monocytes and granulocytes was >90% at the time of LPS injection. IC14 attenuated LPS-induced clinical symptoms and strongly inhibited LPS-induced proinflammatory cytokine release, while only delaying the release of the anti-inflammatory cytokines soluble TNF receptor type I and IL-1 receptor antagonist. IC14 also inhibited leukocyte activation, but more modestly reduced endothelial cell activation and the acute phase protein response. The capacity of circulating monocytes and granulocytes to phagocytose Escherichia coli was only marginally reduced after infusion of IC14. These data provide the first proof of principle that blockade of CD14 is associated with reduced LPS responsiveness in humans in vivo.

Relationship between plasma levels of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and LPS-binding protein in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.

Plasma endotoxin and lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) levels were measured in a group of 253 patients at the onset of severe sepsis and/or septic shock. Endotoxin levels were significantly greater than control levels (n=33; mean +/- SD, 5.1+/-7.3 pg/mL) in 78.3% of patients. Median endotoxin levels in patients with sepsis were 300 pg/mL (25%-75% interquartile range, 110-726 pg/mL). LBP levels were elevated in 97% of patients compared with normal control values of 4.1+/-1.65 microgram/mL. Median LBP levels in patients with sepsis were 31.2 microgram/mL (interquartile range, 22.5-47.7 microgram/mL). Median endotoxin levels at study entry were more highly elevated (515 vs. 230 pg/mL; P<.01), and LBP levels were less highly elevated (28.0 vs. 33.2 microgram/mL; P<.05) in nonsurvivors than survivors over the 28-day study period. No correlation was found between endotoxin and LBP levels. The quantitative level of both endotoxin and LBP may have prognostic significance in patients with severe sepsis.

Confirmatory interleukin-1 receptor antagonist trial in severe sepsis: a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. The Interleukin-1 Receptor Antagonist Sepsis Investigator Group.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the therapeutic efficacy and safety of recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (rhIL-1ra) in the treatment of patients with severe sepsis. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial with a planned, midstudy, interim analysis. SETTING: Ninety-one academic medical center intensive care units in North America and Europe. PATIENTS: Patients with severe sepsis or septic shock (n = 696) received standard supportive care and antimicrobial therapy for sepsis, in addition to rhIL-1ra or placebo. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive either rhIL-1ra (100 mg) or placebo (vehicle) by intravenous bolus, followed by a 72-hr continuous intravenous infusion of either rhIL-1ra (2.0 mg/kg/hr) or placebo. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The study was terminated after an interim analysis found that it was unlikely that the primary efficacy end points would be met. The 28-day, all-cause mortality rate was 33.1% (116/350) in the rhIL-1ra treatment group, while the mortality rate in the placebo group was 36.4% (126/346), yielding a 9% reduction in mortality rate (p = .36). The patients were well matched at the time of study entry; 52.9% of placebo-treated patients were in shock while 50.9% of rhIL-1ra-treated patients were in shock at the time of study entry (p = .30). The mortality rate did not significantly differ between treatment groups when analyzed on the basis of site of infection, infecting microorganism, presence of bacteremia, shock, organ dysfunction, or predicted risk of mortality at the time of study entry. No excess number of adverse reactions or microbial superinfections were attributable to rhIL-1ra treatment in this study. CONCLUSIONS: A 72-hr, continuous intravenous infusion of rhIL-1ra failed to demonstrate a statistically significant reduction in mortality when compared with standard therapy in this multicenter clinical trial. If rhIL-1ra treatment has any therapeutic activity in severe sepsis, the incremental benefits are small and will be difficult to demonstrate in a patient population as defined by this clinical trial.

Use of predicted risk of mortality to evaluate the efficacy of anticytokine therapy in sepsis. The rhIL-1ra Phase III Sepsis Syndrome Study Group.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate a novel anticytokine therapy in patients with sepsis syndrome, and the relationship between a patient's baseline mortality risk and survival benefit. DESIGN: Data from a recent phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trial with patients randomized to three treatment arms: an intravenous loading dose of recombinant human interleukin-1-receptor antagonist (rhIL-1ra) or placebo, followed by a continuous infusion of rhIL-1ra (1.0 mg/kg/hr, or 2.0 mg/kg/hr), or placebo for 72 hrs. SETTING: Sixty-three investigative centers in eight countries. PATIENTS: The study population consisted of 893 patients: 302 placebo patients; 298 patients treated with 1.0 mg/kg/hr of rhIL-1ra; and 293 patients treated with 2.0 mg/kg/hr of rhIL-1ra. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: An independent, sepsis-specific, log-normal regression model that predicts the risk of mortality over 28 days was applied to all patients enrolled into the rhIL-1ra sepsis study. The ability of the Predicted Risk of Mortality model to predict 28-day mortality in the placebo patients was determined and the relationship between mortality risk and efficacy of rhIL-1ra was investigated. The trial data were also analyzed using two other risk-assessment models for comparison with Predicted Risk of Mortality. A significant increase in survival time was demonstrated for all patients treated with rhIL-1ra (n = 893, p < .02 Predicted Risk of Mortality log-normal), but patients with a Predicted Risk of Mortality of < 24% derived little benefit. Retrospective examination of time-to-death data demonstrated that rhIL-1ra reduced risk of death in the first 2 days for patients with > or = 24% Predicted Risk of Mortality (n = 580, p < .005 Predicted Risk of Mortality log-normal). This same effect was not present in patients with a Predicted Risk of Mortality of < 24% on entry into the study. The Predicted Risk of Mortality model predicted a 28-day mortality rate of 35% for placebo patients compared with 34% observed and accurately stratified patients along the full range of risks. There was a wide distribution of individual patient risks for 28-day mortality for all patients, as well as within categorical subgroups, such as shock and organ system dysfunction. Two alternate risk models were assessed and the Acute Physiology Score of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III also demonstrated a statistically significant survival benefit for rhIL-1ra (p = .04 Predicted Risk of Mortality log-normal) for all patients treated. CONCLUSIONS: Using an appropriate analytic model, a statistically significant increase in survival time from rhIL-1ra was measured. A direct relationship was found between a patient's Predicted Risk of Mortality at study entry to efficacy of rhIL-1ra. Individual risk or severity assessment may be a useful tool for evaluating the clinical benefit of new therapeutic approaches to sepsis and for monitoring outcomes at the bedside.

Interleukin-1 contributes to increased concentrations of soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor type I in sepsis.

Studies were done in baboons and humans to assess the role of interleukin (IL)-1 on the release of soluble tumor necrosis factor receptors (sTNFRs) during sepsis. In baboons, IL-1 alpha induced increased levels of sTNFR types I and II. Infusion of Escherichia coli into baboons also led to higher sTNFR levels. Treatment with IL-1 receptor antagonist (ra) attenuated the rise in sTNFR-I, which was positively correlated with a partial preservation of renal function by IL-1ra. In patients with sepsis, treatment with IL-1ra also was associated with lower levels of sTNFR-1 but did not influence plasma creatinine levels. IL-1ra did not affect sTNFR-II in baboons or humans. These data suggest that IL-1 produced during sepsis is involved in increases in sTNFR-I. Such increases during rapidly fatal septic shock may in part be explained by an effect on the renal clearance of sTNFR-I.

Interleukin-1 receptor blockade does not affect endotoxin-induced changes in plasma thyroid hormone and thyrotropin concentrations in man.

Interleukin-1 (IL-1) has been implicated as a mediator of the euthyroid sick syndrome. The effects of IL-1 can be blocked by the naturally occurring IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra). In the present study, iv administration of endotoxin was used as a human model of the euthyroid sick syndrome. To assess the role of endogenous IL-1 in endotoxin-induced changes in plasma thyroid hormone and TSH concentrations, 18 healthy postabsorptive humans were studied on a control study day, followed 3 days later by a study day on which they were randomly assigned to one of three treatments: a 6-h infusion of recombinant human IL-1ra alone (133 mg/h), endotoxin alone (lot EC-5; 20 U/kg), or both endotoxin and IL-1ra. Administration of IL-1ra alone did not affect the plasma concentrations of thyroid hormones or TSH compared with those on the control day. Endotoxin injection was associated with decreases in T4 (P = 0.06 vs. the control day), free T4 (P = 0.02), T3 (P < 0.001), and TSH (P < 0.0001) and a rise in rT3 (P < 0.001), reproducing the major features of the euthyroid sick syndrome. Coinfusion of IL-1ra did not influence these endotoxin-induced changes. Our results suggest that endogenous IL-1 does not play an important role in the alterations in plasma thyroid hormone and TSH concentrations induced by mild endotoxemia in healthy humans.

Role of interleukin-1 and the therapeutic potential of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist in sepsis.

Clinical trials of anticytokines in sepsis have not been as straightforward as had been anticipated from results in animal models of sepsis and the role of cytokines in sepsis is now in question. Retrospective analysis of the results of a phase III trial of interleukin-1 (IL-1) receptor antagonist suggests that sepsis-induced adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), renal dysfunction, and shock are valuable markers of patients in whom IL-1 is a pathogenic mediator and in whom IL-1ra can reduce mortality. A re-examination of the effects of IL-1ra in animal models of sepsis supports the validity of this analysis. A new phase III clinical trial will confirm or disprove the hypothesis that IL-1 is a mediator of pathology, and IL-1ra is a valuable therapy for sepsis complicated by ARDS, DIC, renal dysfunction, or shock.

Recombinant human interleukin 1 receptor antagonist in the treatment of patients with sepsis syndrome. Results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Phase III rhIL-1ra Sepsis Syndrome Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To further define the safety and efficacy of recombinant human interleukin 1 receptor antagonist (rhIL-1ra) in the treatment of sepsis syndrome. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, multinational clinical trial. POPULATION: A total of 893 patients with sepsis syndrome received an intravenous loading dose of rhIL-1ra, 100 mg, or placebo followed by a continuous 72-hour intravenous infusion of rhIL-1ra (1.0 or 2.0 mg/kg per hour) or placebo. OUTCOME MEASURE: Twenty-eight-day all-cause mortality. RESULTS: There was not a significant increase in survival time for rhIL-1ra treatment compared with placebo among all patients who received the study medication (n = 893; generalized Wilcoxon statistic, P = .22) or among patients with shock at study entry (n = 713; generalized Wilcoxon statistic, P = .23), the two primary efficacy analyses specified a priori for this trial. Results from secondary analyses suggest an increase in survival time with rhIL-1ra treatment among patients with dysfunction of one or more organs (n = 563; linear dose-response, P = .009). Retrospective analysis demonstrated an increase in survival time with rhIL-1ra treatment among patients with a predicted risk of mortality of 24% or greater (n = 580; linear dose-response, P = .005) as well as among patients with both dysfunction of one or more organs and a predicted risk of mortality of 24% or greater (n = 411; linear dose-response, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: There was not a statistically significant increase in survival time for rhIL-1ra treatment compared with placebo among all patients who received the study medication or among patients with shock at study entry. Secondary and retrospective analyses of efficacy suggest that treatment with rhIL-1ra results in a dose-related increase in survival time among patients with sepsis who have organ dysfunction and/or a predicted risk of mortality of 24% or greater.

Initial evaluation of human recombinant interleukin-1 receptor antagonist in the treatment of sepsis syndrome: a randomized, open-label, placebo-controlled multicenter trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of human recombinant interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) in the treatment of patients with sepsis syndrome. DESIGN: Prospective, open-label, placebo-controlled, phase II, multicenter clinical trial using three different doses of human recombinant IL-1ra. SETTING: Twelve academic medical center intensive care units in the United States. PATIENTS: Ninety-nine patients with sepsis syndrome or septic shock who received standard supportive care and antimicrobial therapy, in addition to infusion with escalating doses of IL-1ra or placebo. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received an intravenous loading dose of either human recombinant IL-1ra (100 mg) or placebo, followed by a 72-hr intravenous infusion of either one of three doses of IL-1ra (17, 67, or 133 mg/hr) or placebo. All patients were evaluated for 28-day, all-cause mortality. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A dose-dependent, 28-day survival benefit was associated with IL-1ra treatment (p = .015), as indicated by the following mortality rates: 11 (44%) deaths among 25 placebo patients; eight (32%) deaths among 25 patients receiving IL-1ra 17 mg/hr; six (25%) deaths among 24 patients receiving IL-1ra 67 mg/hr; and four (16%) deaths among 25 patients receiving IL-1ra 133 mg/hr. A dose-related survival benefit was observed with infusion of IL-1ra in patients with septic shock at study entry (n = 65; p = .002) and in patients with Gram-negative infection (n = 45; p = .04). Patients with an increased circulating interleukin-6 (IL-6) concentration of > 100 pg/mL at study entry demonstrated a dose-related survival benefit with IL-1ra treatment (p = .009). In patients with an increased IL-6 concentration at study entry, the magnitude of the decrease in IL-6 concentration 24 hrs after the initiation of therapy was correlated with increasing the IL-1ra treatment dose (p = .052). A significant dose-related reduction in the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score was achieved by the end of infusion (p = .038). A renal elimination mechanism for IL-1ra was suggested by the positive correlation between IL-1ra plasma clearance and estimated creatinine clearance (p = .001; r2 = .51). Human recombinant IL-1ra was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: This initial evaluation suggests that human recombinant IL-1ra is safe and may provide a dose-related survival advantage to patients with sepsis syndrome. A larger, definitive clinical trial is needed to confirm these findings.

Pharmacokinetics, safety and immunomodulatory effects of human recombinant interleukin-1 receptor antagonist in healthy humans.

A phase I study of human recombinant interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) was conducted in healthy males between the ages of 18 and 30. Twenty-five volunteers received a single, 3 h continuous intravenous infusion of doses ranging between 1 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg IL-1ra. At 3 h into the infusion, plasma IL-1ra levels were 3.1 micrograms/ml and 29 micrograms/ml for the 1 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg doses, respectively. Post-infusion plasma IL-1ra levels declined rapidly, exhibiting an initial half-life of 21 min and a terminal half-life of 108 min. Clinical, hematological, biochemical, endocrinological and immunomodulatory effects were monitored over 72 h and compared to those of four subjects receiving a 3 h infusion of saline. There were no clinically significant differences between the drug and saline groups in symptoms, physical examinations, complete blood counts, mononuclear cell phenotypes, blood chemistry profiles, serum iron and serum cortisol levels. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) obtained after completion of the IL-1ra infusion synthesized significantly less interleukin 6 ex vivo than PBMC from saline-injected controls. These data suggest that transient blockade of interleukin 1 receptors is safe and does not significantly affect homeostasis.

Dose effectiveness and safety of butorphanol in acute migraine headache.

This study was undertaken to compare the effectiveness and safety of three dosage levels of butorphanol in 52 patients with acute, severe migraine headache. After baseline evaluation, patients were given a dose of butorphanol 1.0, 2.0, or 3.0 mg intramuscularly on a double-blind basis. Assessments of pain intensity and pain relief using 100 mm linear analog scales (LAS), vital signs, and medication side effects were made at 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after the dose. All three treatment groups were similar in baseline characteristics. Each dose of butorphanol demonstrated a significant decrease in pain intensity LAS compared to baseline and increase in pain relief LAS over the observation period. The majority of analgesic response was observed at the first (i.e., 15-min) assessment. Doses of 2.0 and 3.0 mg produced significantly greater analgesia than did 1.0 mg at all posttreatment evaluations. No significant difference was apparent between the 2.0- and 3.0-mg doses. Adverse cardiovascular and respiratory depressant effects were not observed. An analgesic response to butorphanol 2.0 and 3.0 mg is clearly and rapidly evident and near maximum 30-45 minutes after administration. We conclude that in these doses butorphanol provides effective and safe analgesia for patients with acute migraine headache.

Aerosolized metaproterenol in the treatment of asthmatics with severe airflow obstruction. Comparison of two delivery methods.

The bronchodilator response to metaproterenol delivered by metered-dose inhaler (MDI) with a spacer device (Aerochamber [A]) and by jet nebulizer was studied in 44 asthmatic patients who presented to the emergency department with acute severe (FEV1 less than 50 percent predicted) airflow obstruction. The delivery method was randomized, double-blinded and placebo controlled. The A group received one puff of metaproterenol every five minutes for a total of three puffs (1.95 mg). The jet nebulizer group received 15 mg of metaproterenol by continuous nebulization over ten minutes. Only about 2.75 mg of the original 15 mg delivered by jet nebulizer was calculated to be available for inhalation due to the inefficiencies of the delivery system. The mean percentage of improvement in FVC and FEV1 in the A group was 33.5 and 49.0 percent, respectively. The mean percentage of improvement in FVC and FEV1 in the jet nebulizer group was 22.8 and 33.0 percent, respectively. There was no significant difference in the mean percentage of improvement values between the two groups. We were unable to demonstrate a difference in bronchodilator response to metaproterenol delivered by MDI-A and jet nebulizer in emergency department asthmatics with acute severe airflow obstruction.

Blood pressure effects of thyrotropin-releasing hormone and epinephrine in anaphylactic shock.

To compare the effects of a single dose of thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH), epinephrine, and control (normal saline) on mean arterial pressure (MAP) and survival over a one-hour observation period, we carried out a randomized, blinded study using a rabbit model of anaphylaxis. Epinephrine resulted in an increased MAP over normal saline and TRH at one minute after treatment (P less than .001). TRH resulted in an increased MAP over normal saline at two minutes (P less than .017) and over epinephrine at four minutes (P less than .011) after treatment. No differences in MAP were detected beyond four minutes after treatment. There was no difference in survival between treated and control animals (alpha less than .168). Although no difference in survival existed, TRH had a slower onset, but more sustained effect on MAP than did epinephrine and normal saline.