Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Appl Genet ; 56(3): 339-47, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25398197

ABSTRACT

Regression coefficients and genetic variances for 40,890 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for milk yield were calculated using mixed model equations, with deregressed proof (DRP) as the dependent variable. Bulls were genotyped using the Illumina BovineSNP50 v2 BeadChip and SNPs were edited according the minor allele frequency (MAF) and high incidence of missing genotype. Evaluation was conducted in two rounds. In the preliminary round, the direct genetic values (DGVs) of all genotyped bulls (2,904) were computed and the absolute difference between the DGV and the input DRP of each bull was investigated. Bulls with an absolute difference greater than the mean absolute difference plus two standard deviations were eliminated from the data set prior to the final analysis (2,766 bulls remaining). SNP regression coefficients from the final analysis had a mean absolute value of 0.506 kg and a standard deviation of 0.409 kg. The SNP with the highest regression coefficient and genetic variance was ARSBFGLNGS4939 on chromosome 14. This SNP is located within the gene DGAT1 (diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 1). Other SNPs with high regression coefficients and genetic variance are localised in proximity to DGAT1. The mean genetic variance of an individual SNP was 0.170, with a standard deviation of 0.384 and a mean heterozygosity of 0.372. The sum of genetic variances of all SNPs was only 6,968.8, probably because of the existence of genetic covariances between loci. The largest sum of genetic variances was on chromosome 14 (498.4, 7.15 % of the total). After the final analysis, the correlation between the DGV and the input DRP was 0.951 for all bulls. The variance of the predicted DGV was 98.11 % of the variance of the input estimated breeding value (EBV) and 63.65 % of the variance of the DRP.


Subject(s)
Cattle/genetics , Milk , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Animals , Breeding , Dairying , Diacylglycerol O-Acyltransferase/genetics , Gene Frequency , Genotype , Male , Models, Genetic
2.
J Sci Food Agric ; 90(11): 1765-73, 2010 Aug 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20564310

ABSTRACT

The evaluation of an animal is based on production records, adjusted for environmental effects, which gives a reliable estimation of its breeding value. Highly reliable daughter yield deviations are used as inputs for genetic marker evaluation. Genetic variability is explained by particular loci and background polygenes, both of which are described by the genomic breeding value selection index. Automated genotyping enables the determination of many single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and can increase the reliability of evaluation of young animals (from 0.30 if only the pedigree value is used to 0.60 when the genomic breeding value is applied). However, the introduction of SNPs requires a mixed model with a large number of regressors, in turn requiring new algorithms for the best linear unbiased prediction and BayesB. Here, we discuss a method that uses a genomic relationship matrix to estimate the genomic breeding value of animals directly, without regressors. A one-step procedure evaluates both genotyped and ungenotyped animals at the same time, and produces one common ranking of all animals in a whole population. An augmented pedigree-genomic relationship matrix and the removal of prerequisites produce more accurate evaluations of all connected animals.


Subject(s)
Breeding , Cattle/genetics , Genetic Variation , Genome , Quantitative Trait Loci , Animals , Genetic Markers , Genotype , Models, Genetic , Pedigree , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Quantitative Trait, Heritable
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...