Usefulness of Blood Pressure Variability Indices Derived From 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Detecting Autonomic Failure.

Background Increased blood pressure ( BP ) variability and nondipping status seen on 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring are often observed in autonomic failure ( ATF ). Methods and Results We assessed BP variability and nocturnal BP dipping in 273 patients undergoing ambulatory BP monitoring at Southwestern Medical Center between 2010 and 2017. SD , average real variability, and variation independent of mean were calculated from ambulatory BP monitoring. Patients were divided into a discovery cohort (n=201) and a validation cohort (n=72). ATF was confirmed by formal autonomic function test. In the discovery cohort, 24-hour and nighttime average real variability, SD , and variation independent of mean did not differ significantly between ATF (n=25) and controls (n=176, all P>0.05). However, daytime SD, daytime coefficient of variation, and daytime variation independent of mean of systolic BP ( SBP ) were all significantly higher in patients with ATF than in controls in both discovery and validation cohorts. Nocturnal BP dipping was more blunted in ATF patients than controls in both cohorts (both P<0.01). Using the threshold of 16 mm Hg, daytime SD SBP yielded a sensitivity of 77% and specificity of 82% in detecting ATF in the validation cohort, whereas nondipping status had a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 44%. The area under the receiver operator characteristic of daytime SD SBP was greater than the area under the receiver operator characteristic of nocturnal SBP dipping (0.79 [0.66-0.91] versus 0.73 [0.58-0.87], respectively). Conclusions Daytime SD of SBP is a better screening tool than nondipping status in detecting autonomic dysfunction.

The association of abnormal findings on transthoracic echocardiography with 2011 Appropriate Use Criteria and clinical impact.

Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) were developed to promote high-value care. We describe the prevalence of clinically significant abnormal TTE findings overall and in subgroups defined by appropriate and inappropriate AUC, and their association with clinical impact. 548 consecutive TTEs at an academic medical center were retrospectively reviewed for AUC, clinical impact, and TTE abnormalities. TTE reports within 1 year of the index TTE were reviewed to determine if abnormalities were new, unchanged, or resolved. Clinical impact was classified into no change, active change, or continuation of care. 91% of TTEs were appropriate, 5% were inappropriate, and 4% were uncertain by AUC. 46% of all TTEs and 57% of first-time TTEs had no significant TTE abnormalities. Appropriate TTEs had a higher prevalence of ≥1 TTE abnormality than inappropriate TTEs (56 vs. 33%, p = 0.029). Among repeat TTEs, 72 % had ≥1 TTE abnormality, however only 25% had a new abnormality. The prevalence of a new abnormality was similar between inappropriate and appropriate repeat TTEs (25 vs. 26%, p = 1.0). The prevalence of ≥1 abnormality was similar between TTEs that resulted in active change and no change in care (70 vs. 64%, p = 0.06). Although most TTEs were appropriate as defined by AUC, the majority had no significant abnormalities. Although most TTEs were appropriate by AUC, >50% of all TTEs and 25% of repeat TTEs had no significant abnormalities. Appropriate TTEs had a higher prevalence of abnormalities, however the prevalence of abnormalities was similar between TTEs that resulted in active change versus no change in care.

Appropriate use and clinical impact of transthoracic echocardiography.

IMPORTANCE: Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) accounts for almost half of all cardiac imaging services and is a widely available and versatile tool. Appropriate use criteria (AUC) for echocardiography were developed to improve patient care and health outcomes. Prior studies have shown that most TTEs are appropriate by AUC. However, the associations among TTE, AUC, and their clinical impact have not been well explored. OBJECTIVES: To describe the proportion of TTEs that affect clinical care in an academic medical center overall and in subgroups defined as appropriate and inappropriate by AUC. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective review of medical records from 535 consecutive TTEs at an academic medical center was performed. The TTEs were classified according to 2011 AUC by 2 cardiologists blinded to clinical impact and were assessed for clinical impact by 2 cardiologists blinded to AUC. Clinical impact was assigned to 1 of the following 3 categories: (1) active change in care, (2) continuation of current care, or (3) no change in care. PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred thirty-five patients undergoing TTE. EXPOSURE: Transthoracic echocardiography. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Prevalence of appropriate, inappropriate, and uncertain TTEs and prevalence of clinical impact subcategories. RESULTS: Overall, 31.8% of TTEs resulted in an active change in care; 46.9%, continuation of current care; and 21.3%, no change in care. By 2011 AUC, 91.8% of TTEs were appropriate; 4.3%, inappropriate; and 3.9%, uncertain. We detected no statistically significant difference between appropriate and inappropriate TTEs in the proportion of TTEs that led to active change in care (32.2% vs 21.7%; P= .29). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Although 9 in 10 TTEs were appropriate by 2011 AUC, fewer than 1 in 3 TTEs resulted in an active change in care, nearly half resulted in continuation of current care, and slightly more than 1 in 5 resulted in no change in care. The low rate of active change in care (31.8%) among TTEs mostly classified as appropriate (91.8%) highlights the need for a better method to optimize TTE utilization to use limited health care resources efficiently while providing high-quality care.

The metabolic cost of lowering blood pressure with hydrochlorothiazide.

BACKGROUND: The landmark Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering treatment to prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) placed a new spotlight on thiazide diuretics as the first-line therapy for hypertension. This is concerning as thiazide-diuretics may contribute to comorbidities associated with the current epidemic of obesity. Previous randomized clinical trials have linked thiazide diuretic treatment to insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome, and increased incidence of type 2 diabetes. METHODS: This proof of concept, longitudinal, randomized, double-blind study evaluated the effects of the angiotensin II receptor blocker Valsartan and the specific thiazide diuretic Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) on hepatic triglyceride level (primary outcome), as well as triglyceride levels within other organs including the heart, skeletal muscle, and pancreas. Additionally, we evaluated whether myocardial function, insulin sensitivity, and insulin secretion were affected by these treatments. RESULTS: Hepatic TG levels increased by 57% post HCTZ treatment: ∆hTG HCTZ = 4.12% and remained unchanged post Valsartan treatment: ∆hTG V = 0.06%. The elevation of hepatic TG levels after HCTZ treatment was additionally accompanied by a reduction in insulin sensitivity: ∆SI HCTZ = -1.14. Treatment with Valsartan resulted in improved insulin sensitivity: ∆SI V = 1.24. Treatment-induced changes in hepatic TG levels and insulin sensitivity were statistically significant between groups (phTG = 0.0098 and pSI = 0.0345 respectively). Disposition index, DI, remained unchanged after HCTZ treatment: ∆DI HCTZ = -141 but it was increased by a factor of 2 after treatment with Valsartan: ∆DI V =1018). However, the change between groups was not statistically significant. Both therapies did not modify abdominal visceral and subcutaneous fat mass as well as myocardial structure and function. Additionally, myocardial, pancreatic, and skeletal muscle triglyceride deposits remained unchanged in both therapeutic arms. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings are two-fold and relate to hepatic steatosis and insulin sensitivity. HCTZ treatment worsened hepatic steatosis measured as hepatic triglyceride content and reduced insulin sensitivity. Valsartan treatment did not affect hepatic triglyceride levels and improved insulin sensitivity. The results of this study reinforce the message that in patients at risk for type 2 diabetes it is particularly important to choose an antihypertensive regimen that lowers blood pressure without exacerbating patient's metabolic profile.

Noninvasive quantification of pancreatic fat in humans.

OBJECTIVE: To validate magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) as a tool for non-invasive quantification of pancreatic triglyceride (TG) content and to measure the pancreatic TG content in a diverse human population with a wide range of body mass index (BMI) and glucose control. METHODS: To validate the MRS method, we measured TG content in the pancreatic tissue of 12 lean and 12 fatty ZDF rats (ages 5-14 weeks) both by MRS and the gold standard biochemical assay. We used MRS to measure pancreatic TG content in vivo in 79 human volunteers. Additionally, to assess the reproducibility of the method, in 33 volunteers we obtained duplicate MRS measurements 1-2 weeks apart. RESULTS: MRS quantifies pancreatic TG content with high reproducibility and concordance to the biochemical measurement (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient = 0.91). In humans, median pancreatic TG content was as follows: (1) normal weight and normoglycemic group 0.46 f/w%, (2) overweight or obese but normoglycemic group 3.16 f/w%, (3) impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance group (BMI matched with group 2) 5.64 f/w%, and (4) untreated type 2 diabetes group (BMI matched with group 2) 5.54 f/w% (Jonckheere-Terpstra trend test across groups p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Human pancreatic steatosis, as measured by MRS, increases with BMI and with impaired glycemia. MRS is a quantitative and reproducible non-invasive clinical research tool which will enable systematic studies of the relationship between ectopic fat accumulation in the pancreas and development of type 2 diabetes.