Genetic evidence for a phosphorylation-independent signal transduction mechanism within the Bacillus subtilis stressosome.

The stressosome is a 1.8 MDa cytoplasmic complex that controls diverse bacterial signaling pathways. Its role is best understood in Bacillus subtilis, where it activates the σB transcription factor in response to a variety of sharp environmental challenges, including acid, ethanol, heat or salt stress. However, details of the signaling mechanism within the stressosome remain uncertain. The core of the complex comprises one or more members of the RsbR co-antagonist family together with the RsbS antagonist protein, which binds the RsbT kinase in the absence of stress. As part of the response, RsbT first phosphorylates the RsbRA co-antagonist on T171 and then RsbS on S59; this latter event correlates with the stress-induced release of RsbT to activate downstream signaling. Here we examine the in vivo consequence of S59 phosphorylation in a model strain whose stressosome core is formed solely with the RsbRA co-antagonist and RsbS. A phosphorylation-deficient S59A substitution in RsbS blocked response to mild stress but had declining impact as stress increased: with strong ethanol challenge response with S59A was 60% as robust as with wild type RsbS. Genetic analysis narrowed this S59-independent activation to the stressosome and established that significant signaling still occurred in a strain bearing both the T171A and S59A substitutions. We infer that S59 phosphorylation increases signaling efficiency but is not essential, and that a second (or underlying) mechanism of signal transduction prevails in its absence. This interpretation nullifies models in which stressosome signaling is solely mediated by control of RsbT kinase activity toward S59.

Two surfaces of a conserved interdomain linker differentially affect output from the RST sensing module of the Bacillus subtilis stressosome.

The stressosome is a 1.8-MDa cytoplasmic complex that conveys environmental signals to the σ(B) stress factor of Bacillus subtilis. A functionally irreducible complex contains multiple copies of three proteins: the RsbRA coantagonist, RsbS antagonist, and RsbT serine-threonine kinase. Homologues of these proteins are coencoded in different genome contexts in diverse bacteria, forming a versatile sensing and transmission module called RST after its common constituents. However, the signaling pathway within the stressosome itself is not well defined. The N-terminal, nonheme globin domains of RsbRA project from the stressosome and are presumed to channel sensory input to the C-terminal STAS domains that form the complex core. A conserved, 13-residue α-helical linker connects these domains. We probed the in vivo role of the linker using alanine scanning mutagenesis, assaying stressosome output in B. subtilis via a σ(B)-dependent reporter fusion. Substitutions at four conserved residues increased output 4- to 30-fold in unstressed cells, whereas substitutions at four nonconserved residues significantly decreased output. The periodicity of these effects supports a model in which RsbRA functions as a dimer in vivo, with the linkers forming parallel paired helices via a conserved interface. The periodicity further suggests that the opposite, nonconserved faces make additional contacts important for efficient stressosome operation. These results establish that the linker influences stressosome output under steady-state conditions. However, the stress response phenotypes of representative linker substitutions provide less support for the notion that the N-terminal globin domain senses acute environmental challenge and transmits this information via the linker helix.

An α/ß hydrolase and associated Per-ARNT-Sim domain comprise a bipartite sensing module coupled with diverse output domains.

The RsbQ α/ß hydrolase and RsbP serine phosphatase form a signaling pair required to activate the general stress factor σ(B) of Bacillus subtilis in response to energy limitation. RsbP has a predicted N-terminal Per-ARNT-Sim (PAS) domain, a central coiled-coil, and a C-terminal protein phosphatase M (PPM) domain. Previous studies support a model in which RsbQ provides an activity needed for PAS to regulate the phosphatase domain via the coiled-coil. RsbQ and the PAS domain (RsbP-PAS) therefore appear to form a sensory module. Here we test this hypothesis using bioinformatic and genetic analysis. We found 45 RsbQ and RsbP-PAS homologues encoded by adjacent genes in diverse bacteria, with PAS and a predicted coiled-coil fused to one of three output domains: PPM phosphatase (Gram positive bacteria), histidine protein kinase (Gram negative bacteria), and diguanylate cyclase (both lineages). Multiple alignment of the RsbP-PAS homologues suggested nine residues that distinguish the class. Alanine substitutions at four of these conferred a null phenotype in B. subtilis, indicating their functional importance. The F55A null substitution lay in the Fα helix of an RsbP-PAS model. F55A inhibited interaction of RsbP with RsbQ in yeast two-hybrid and pull-down assays but did not significantly affect interaction of RsbP with itself. We propose that RsbQ directly contacts the PAS domains of an RsbP oligomer to provide the activating signal, which is propagated to the phosphatase domains via the coiled-coil. A similar mechanism would allow the RsbQ-PAS module to convey a common input signal to structurally diverse output domains, controlling a variety of physiological responses.

Substitutions in the presumed sensing domain of the Bacillus subtilis stressosome affect its basal output but not response to environmental signals.

The stressosome is a multiprotein, 1.8-MDa icosahedral complex that transmits diverse environmental signals to activate the general stress response of Bacillus subtilis. The way in which it senses these cues and the pathway of signal propagation within the stressosome itself are poorly understood. The stressosome core consists of four members of the RsbR coantagonist family together with the RsbS antagonist; its cryo-electron microscopy (cryoEM) image suggests that the N-terminal domains of the RsbR proteins form homodimers positioned to act as sensors on the stressosome surface. Here we probe the role of the N-terminal domain of the prototype coantagonist RsbRA by making structure-based amino acid substitutions in potential interaction surfaces. To unmask the phenotypes caused by single-copy rsbRA mutations, we constructed strains lacking the other three members of the RsbR coantagonist family and assayed system output using a reporter fusion. Effects of five individual alanine substitutions in the prominent dimer groove did not match predictions from an earlier in vitro assay, indicating that the in vivo assay was necessary to assess their influence on signaling. Additional substitutions expected to negatively affect domain dimerization had substantial impact, whereas those that sampled other prominent surface features had no consequence. Notably, even mutations resulting in significantly altered phenotypes raised the basal level of system output only in unstressed cells and had little effect on the magnitude of subsequent stress signaling. Our results provide evidence that the N-terminal domain of the RsbRA coantagonist affects stressosome function but offer no direct support for the hypothesis that it is a signal sensor.

In vivo phosphorylation patterns of key stressosome proteins define a second feedback loop that limits activation of Bacillus subtilis σB.

The Bacillus subtilis stressosome is a 1.8 MDa complex that orchestrates activation of the σ(B) transcription factor by environmental stress. The complex comprises members of the RsbR co-antagonist family and the RsbS antagonist, which together form an icosahedral core that sequesters the RsbT serine-threonine kinase. Phosphorylation of this core by RsbT is associated with RsbT release, which activates downstream signalling. RsbRA, the prototype co-antagonist, is phosphorylated on T171 and T205 in vitro. In unstressed cells T171 is already phosphorylated; this is a prerequisite but not the trigger for activation, which correlates with stress-induced phosphorylation of RsbS on S59. In contrast, phosphorylation of RsbRA T205 has not been detected in vivo. Here we find (i) RsbRA is additionally phosphorylated on T205 following strong stresses, (ii) this modification requires RsbT, and (iii) the phosphorylation-deficient T205A substitution greatly increases post-stress activation of σ(B) . We infer that T205 phosphorylation constitutes a second feedback mechanism to limit σ(B) activation, operating in addition to the RsbX feedback phosphatase. Loss of RsbX function increases the fraction of phosphorylated RsbS and doubly phosphorylated RsbRA in unstressed cells. We propose that RsbX both maintains the ready state of the stressosome prior to stress and restores it post-stress.

Physical and antibiotic stresses require activation of the RsbU phosphatase to induce the general stress response in Listeria monocytogenes.

Among pathogenic strains of Listeria monocytogenes, the sigma(B) transcription factor has a pivotal role in the outcome of food-borne infections. This factor is activated by diverse stresses to provide general protection against multiple challenges, including those encountered during gastrointestinal passage. It also acts with the PrfA regulator to control virulence genes needed for entry into intestinal lumen cells. Environmental and nutritional signals modulate sigma(B) activity via a network that operates by the partner switching mechanism, in which protein interactions are controlled by serine phosphorylation. This network is well characterized in the related bacterium Bacillus subtilis. A key difference in Listeria is the presence of only one input phosphatase, RsbU, instead of the two found in B. subtilis. Here, we aim to determine whether this sole phosphatase is required to convey physical, antibiotic and nutritional stress signals, or if additional pathways might exist. To that end, we constructed L. monocytogenes 10403S strains bearing single-copy, sigma(B)-dependent opuCA-lacZ reporter fusions to determine the effects of an rsbU deletion under physiological conditions. All stresses tested, including acid, antibiotic, cold, ethanol, heat, osmotic and nutritional challenge, required RsbU to activate sigma(B). This was of particular significance for cold stress activation, which occurs via a phosphatase-independent mechanism in B. subtilis. We also assayed the effects of the D80N substitution in the upstream RsbT regulator that activates RsbU. The mutant had a phenotype consistent with low and uninducible phosphatase activity, but nonetheless responded to nutritional stress. We infer that RsbU activity but not its induction is required for nutritional signalling, which would enter the network downstream from RsbU.

Bypass suppression analysis maps the signalling pathway within a multidomain protein: the RsbP energy stress phosphatase 2C from Bacillus subtilis.

The network controlling the general stress response in Bacillus subtilis requires both the RsbP phosphatase and the RsbQ alpha/beta hydrolase to convey signals of energy stress. RsbP contains three domains: an N-terminal PAS, a central coiled-coil and a C-terminal PP2C phosphatase. We report here a genetic analysis that established the functional interactions of the domains and their relationship to RsbQ. Random mutagenesis of rsbP yielded 17 independent bypass suppressors that had activity in an rsbQ null strain background. The altered residues clustered in three regions of RsbP: the coiled-coil and two predicted helices of the phosphatase domain. One helix (alpha0) is unique to a subfamily of bacterial PP2C phosphatases that possess N-terminal sensing domains. The other (alpha1) is distinct from the active site in all solved PP2C structures. The phenotypes of the suppressors and directed deletions support a model in which the coiled-coil negatively controls phosphatase activity, perhaps via the alpha0-alpha1 helices, with RsbQ hydrolase activity and the PAS domain jointly comprising a positive sensing module that counters the coiled-coil. We propose that the alpha0 helix characterizes an extended PP2C domain in many bacterial signalling proteins, and suggest it provides a means to communicate information from diverse input domains.

Distinctive topologies of partner-switching signaling networks correlate with their physiological roles.

Regulatory networks controlling bacterial gene expression often evolve from common origins and share homologous proteins and similar network motifs. However, when functioning in different physiological contexts, these motifs may be re-arranged with different topologies that significantly affect network performance. Here we analyze two related signaling networks in the bacterium Bacillus subtilis in order to assess the consequences of their different topologies, with the aim of formulating design principles applicable to other systems. These two networks control the activities of the general stress response factor sigma(B) and the first sporulation-specific factor sigma(F). Both networks have at their core a "partner-switching" mechanism, in which an anti-sigma factor forms alternate complexes either with the sigma factor, holding it inactive, or with an anti-anti-sigma factor, thereby freeing sigma. However, clear differences in network structure are apparent: the anti-sigma factor for sigma(F) forms a long-lived, "dead-end" complex with its anti-anti-sigma factor and ADP, whereas the genes encoding sigma(B) and its network partners lie in a sigma(B)-controlled operon, resulting in positive and negative feedback loops. We constructed mathematical models of both networks and examined which features were critical for the performance of each design. The sigma(F) model predicts that the self-enhancing formation of the dead-end complex transforms the network into a largely irreversible hysteretic switch; the simulations reported here also demonstrate that hysteresis and slow turn off kinetics are the only two system properties associated with this complex formation. By contrast, the sigma(B) model predicts that the positive and negative feedback loops produce graded, reversible behavior with high regulatory capacity and fast response time. Our models demonstrate how alterations in network design result in different system properties that correlate with regulatory demands. These design principles agree with the known or suspected roles of similar networks in diverse bacteria.

The SsrA-SmpB ribosome rescue system is important for growth of Bacillus subtilis at low and high temperatures.

Bacillus subtilis has multiple stress response systems whose integrated action promotes growth and survival under unfavorable conditions. Here we address the function and transcriptional organization of a five-gene cluster containing ssrA, previously known to be important for growth at high temperature because of the role of its tmRNA product in rescuing stalled ribosomes. Reverse transcription-PCR experiments detected a single message for the secG-yvaK-rnr-smpB-ssrA cluster, suggesting that it constitutes an operon. However, rapid amplification of cDNA ends-PCR and lacZ fusion experiments indicated that operon transcription is complex, with at least five promoters controlling different segments of the cluster. One sigma(A)-like promoter preceded secG (P(1)), and internal sigma(A)-like promoters were found in both the rnr-smpB (P(2)) and smpB-ssrA intervals (P(3) and P(HS)). Another internal promoter lay in the secG-yvaK intercistronic region, and this activity (P(B)) was dependent on the general stress factor sigma(B). Null mutations in the four genes downstream from P(B) were tested for their effects on growth. Loss of yvaK (carboxylesterase E) or rnr (RNase R) caused no obvious phenotype. By contrast, smpB was required for growth at high temperature (52 degrees C), as anticipated if its product (a small ribosomal binding protein) is essential for tmRNA (ssrA) function. Notably, smpB and ssrA were also required for growth at low temperature (16 degrees C), a phenotype not previously associated with tmRNA activity. These results extend the known high-temperature role of ssrA and indicate that the ribosome rescue system is important at both extremes of the B. subtilis temperature range.

The blue-light receptor YtvA acts in the environmental stress signaling pathway of Bacillus subtilis.

The general stress response of the bacterium Bacillus subtilis is regulated by a partner-switching mechanism in which serine and threonine phosphorylation controls protein interactions in the stress-signaling pathway. The environmental branch of this pathway contains a family of five paralogous proteins that function as negative regulators. Here we present genetic evidence that a sixth paralog, YtvA, acts as a positive regulator in the same environmental signaling branch. We also present biochemical evidence that YtvA and at least three of the negative regulators can be isolated from cell extracts in a large environmental signaling complex. YtvA differs from these associated negative regulators by its flavin mononucleotide (FMN)-containing light-oxygen-voltage domain. Others have shown that this domain has the photochemistry expected for a blue-light sensor, with the covalent linkage of the FMN chromophore to cysteine 62 composing a critical part of the photocycle. Consistent with the view that light intensity modifies the output of the environmental signaling pathway, we found that cysteine 62 is required for YtvA to exert its positive regulatory role in the absence of other stress. Transcriptional analysis of the ytvA structural gene indicated that it provides the entry point for at least one additional environmental input, mediated by the Spx global regulator of disulfide stress. These results support a model in which the large signaling complex serves to integrate multiple environmental signals in order to modulate the general stress response.

Signalling network with a bistable hysteretic switch controls developmental activation of the sigma transcription factor in Bacillus subtilis.

The sporulation process of the bacterium Bacillus subtilis unfolds by means of separate but co-ordinated programmes of gene expression within two unequal cell compartments, the mother cell and the smaller forespore. sigmaF is the first compartment-specific transcription factor activated during this process, and it is controlled at the post-translational level by a partner-switching mechanism that restricts sigmaF activity to the forespore. The crux of this mechanism lies in the ability of the anti-sigma factor SpoIIAB (AB) to form alternative complexes either with sigmaF, holding it in an inactive form, or with the anti-anti-sigma factor SpoIIAA (AA) and a nucleotide, either ATP or ADP. In the complex with AB and ATP, AA is phosphorylated on a serine residue and released, making AB available to capture sigmaF in an inactive complex. Subsequent activation of sigmaF requires the intervention of the SpoIIE serine phosphatase to dephosphorylate AA, which can then attack the AB-sigmaF complex to induce the release of sigmaF. By incorporating biochemical, biophysical and genetic data from the literature we have constructed an integrative mathematical model of this partner-switching network. The model predicts that the self-enhancing formation of a long-lived complex of AA, AB and ADP transforms the network into an essentially irreversible hysteretic switch, thereby explaining the sharp, robust and irreversible activation of sigmaF in the forespore compartment. The model also clarifies the contributions of the partly redundant mechanisms that ensure correct spatial and temporal activation of sigmaF, reproduces the behaviour of various mutants and makes strong, testable predictions.

Core of the partner switching signalling mechanism is conserved in the obligate intracellular pathogen Chlamydia trachomatis.

Chlamydia trachomatis is an obligate intracellular bacterial pathogen that can cause sexually transmitted and ocular diseases in humans. Its biphasic developmental cycle and ability to evade host-cell defences suggest that the organism responds to external signals, but its genome encodes few recognized signalling pathways. One such pathway is predicted to function by a partner switching mechanism, in which key protein interactions are controlled by serine phosphorylation. From genome analysis this mechanism is both ancient and widespread among eubacteria, but it has been experimentally characterized in only a few. C. trachomatis has no system of genetic exchange, so here an in vitro approach was used to establish the activities and interactions of the inferred partner switching components: the RsbW switch protein/kinase and its RsbV antagonists. The C. trachomatis genome encodes two RsbV paralogs, RsbV(1) and RsbV(2). We found that each RsbV protein was specifically phosphorylated by RsbW, and tandem mass spectrometry located the phosphoryl group on a conserved serine residue. Mutant RsbV(1) and RsbV(2) proteins in which this conserved serine was changed to alanine could activate the yeast two-hybrid system when paired with RsbW, whereas mutant proteins bearing a charged aspartate failed to activate. From this we infer that the phosphorylation state of RsbV(1) and RsbV(2) controls their interaction with RsbW in vivo. This experimental demonstration that the core of the partner switching mechanism is conserved in C. trachomatis indicates that its basic features are maintained over a large evolutionary span. Although the molecular target of the C. trachomatis switch remains to be identified, based on the predicted properties of its input phosphatases we propose that the pathway controls an important aspect of the developmental cycle within the host, in response to signals external to the C. trachomatis cytoplasmic membrane.

In vivo phosphorylation of partner switching regulators correlates with stress transmission in the environmental signaling pathway of Bacillus subtilis.

Exposure of bacteria to diverse growth-limiting stresses induces the synthesis of a common set of proteins which provide broad protection against future, potentially lethal stresses. Among Bacillus subtilis and its relatives, this general stress response is controlled by the sigmaB transcription factor. Signals of environmental and energy stress activate sigmaB through a multicomponent network that functions via a partner switching mechanism, in which protein-protein interactions are governed by serine and threonine phosphorylation. Here, we tested a central prediction of the current model for the environmental signaling branch of this network. We used isoelectric focusing and immunoblotting experiments to determine the in vivo phosphorylation states of the RsbRA and RsbS regulators, which act in concert to negatively control the RsbU environmental signaling phosphatase. As predicted by the model, the ratio of the phosphorylated to unphosphorylated forms of both RsbRA and RsbS increased in response to salt or ethanol stress. However, these two regulators differed substantially with regard to the extent of their phosphorylation under both steady-state and stress conditions, with RsbRA always the more highly modified. Mutant analysis showed that the RsbT kinase, which is required for environmental signaling, was also required for the in vivo phosphorylation of RsbRA and RsbS. Moreover, the T171A alteration of RsbRA, which blocks environmental signaling, also blocked in vivo phosphorylation of RsbRA and impeded phosphorylation of RsbS. These in vivo results corroborate previous genetic analyses and link the phosphorylated forms of RsbRA and RsbS to the active transmission of environmental stress signals.

A multicomponent protein complex mediates environmental stress signaling in Bacillus subtilis.

Activity of the general stress transcription factor sigma(B) of Bacillus subtilis is regulated directly by a partner-switching mechanism in which key protein interactions are governed by serine phosphorylation. Signals of energy or environmental stress are conveyed to sigma(B) by independent pathways, each terminating with a differentially regulated serine phosphatase, whose activity is required to control the partner-switching regulators. We present genetic and biochemical evidence that activation of the RsbU environmental signaling phosphatase is modulated by a second, atypical partner switch that comprises redundant negative regulatory proteins in a large, multicomponent signaling complex. In the current model, negative regulation of the RsbU phosphatase depends solely on the RsbS antagonist protein. Here, we perform a critical genetic test that invalidates this model and demonstrates that the RsbS antagonist alone is insufficient to prevent environmental signaling. Also required is one of a family of four co-antagonist proteins, here renamed RsbRA, RsbRB, RsbRC, and RsbRD, each with a carboxyl-terminal domain closely resembling the entire RsbS protein. Because any single member of the RsbR family, together with RsbS, was sufficient for environmental signaling, we conclude that the RsbR proteins serve as redundant co-antagonists necessary for RsbS antagonist function. Moreover, purification of RsbRA from cell extracts by nickel affinity and gel-filtration chromatography found a multicomponent complex containing the RsbRA and RsbRB co-antagonists together with the RsbS antagonist. We propose that this complex serves as a machine to transmit stress signals to sigma(B), and that the properties of the complex may contribute to environmental stress sensing.

Insulation of the sigmaF regulatory system in Bacillus subtilis.

The transcription factors sigmaF and sigmaB are related RNA polymerase sigma factors that govern dissimilar networks of adaptation to stress conditions in Bacillus subtilis. The two factors are controlled by closely related regulatory pathways, involving protein kinases and phosphatases. We report that insulation of the sigmaF pathway from the sigmaB pathway involves the integrated action of both the cognate kinase and the cognate phosphatase.

The PrpC serine-threonine phosphatase and PrkC kinase have opposing physiological roles in stationary-phase Bacillus subtilis cells.

Loss of the PrpC serine-threonine phosphatase and the associated PrkC kinase of Bacillus subtilis were shown to have opposite effects on stationary-phase physiology by differentially affecting cell density, cell viability, and accumulation of beta-galactosidase from a general stress reporter fusion. These pleiotropic effects suggest that PrpC and PrkC have important regulatory roles in stationary-phase cells. Elongation factor G (EF-G) was identified as one possible target of the PrpC and PrkC pair in vivo, and purified PrpC and PrkC manifested the predicted phosphatase and kinase activities against EF-G in vitro.

Two genes from Bacillus subtilis under the sole control of the general stress transcription factor sigmaB.

The general stress response of Bacillus subtilis is triggered by a variety of environmental and metabolic stresses which activate the sigmaB transcription factor. Among the more than 100 genes controlled by sigmaB (the csb genes), the functions identified thus far include resistance to oxidative stress, resistance to protein denaturation and resistance to osmotic stress. To understand the breadth of functions in which csb genes participate, the transcriptional organization and predicted products of two such genes previously identified in a screen for sigmaB-dependent lacZ fusions were analysed. The csb-22::Tn917lacZ and csb-34::Tn917lacZ fusions are unusual among csb genes in that their expression appears to be completely dependent upon sigmaB. By plasmid-integration experiments, fusion analyses and site-directed mutagenesis, stress-inducible, sigmaB-dependent promoters for both these fusions were identified. The csb-34 fusion marked an ORF (yxcC or csbC) which by sequence analysis lay in a monocistronic transcriptional unit. This ORF encoded a predicted 461-residue product which had high identity with Class I sugar transporters of the major facilitator superfamily. It was speculated that the csbC product could serve either a nutritional or an osmotic protection function. In contrast, the csb-22 fusion identified an ORF (ywmG or csbD) which appeared to be the second gene of a two-gene operon. This ORF encoded a predicted 62-residue product which resembled a small Escherichia coli protein of unknown function. The sigmaB. dependent promoter lay immediately upstream from csbD and appeared to be an internal promoter for the operon.