Improved implementation of medical tests - barriers and opportunities.

Applying the concept of a value proposition to medical testing is just one of the many ways to identify and monitor the value of tests. A key part of this concept focusses on processes that should take place after a test is introduced into routine local practice, namely test implementation. This process requires identification of the clinical pathway, the stakeholders and the benefits or disbenefits that accrue to those stakeholders. There are various barriers and challenges to test implementation. Implementation requires the process of clinical audit which involves measurement of outcomes external to the laboratory but this is not widely performed in laboratory medicine. A second key challenge is that implementation requires liaison with stakeholders outside of the laboratory including clinicians and other healthcare professional such as finance managers. Many laboratories are remote from clinical care and other stakeholders making such liaison difficult. The implementation process is based on data which again will be primarily on processes outside of the laboratory. However the recent enthusiasm for so-called real world data and new data mining techniques may represent opportunities that will facilitate better test implementation. A final barrier is that a range of new tools not currently in the education curriculum of the laboratory professional is required for implementation such as those of preparing a business case to support the introduction of a test and health economic analysis. The professional bodies in laboratory medicine could assist with education in these areas.

Health economic evaluations of medical tests: Translating laboratory information into value - A case study example.

Health-care providers and funders are focused on identifying value in all their services and that includes laboratories. This means that in order to gain a share of scarce resources, laboratory professionals must also understand and assess the value of tests and that includes their economic impact. This can be assessed using health economic modelling tools which, when used in conjunction with a detailed value proposition for the test, can translate laboratory information into value. While a variety of health economic assessment tools are available, this review will focus on the use of decision analytic models which essentially compare the outcomes from pathways with and without the new test, the value of which is being assessed. A step-by-step framework is provided to guide laboratory professionals through the essential steps of conducting the evaluation. Initial steps include mapping the clinical pathway, understanding the goal of the evaluation, identifying the key stakeholders and their needs and determining a suitable analytical model. Following collection of the actual data, the validity of the model must be checked, and the robustness of the outcomes tested through sensitivity analysis. The last step is to translate the findings into measures of value which can then inform appropriate decisions by the stakeholders. This review of basic health economic modelling should enable laboratory professionals to have an understanding of how modelling can be applied to tests in their own environment and help deliver their potential value.

How to Realize the Benefits of Point-of-Care Testing at the General Practice: A Comparison of Four High-Income Countries.

BACKGROUND: In some countries, such as the Netherlands and Norway, point-of-care testing (POCT) is more widely implemented in general practice compared to countries such as England and Australia. To comprehend what is necessary to realize the benefits of POCT, regarding its integration in primary care, it would be beneficial to have an overview of the structure of healthcare operations and the transactions between stakeholders (also referred to as value networks). The aim of this paper is to identify the current value networks in place applying to POCT implementation at general practices in England, Australia, Norway and the Netherlands and to compare these networks in terms of seven previously published factors that support the successful implementation, sustainability and scale-up of innovations. METHODS: The value networks were described based on formal guidelines and standards published by the respective governments, organizational bodies and affiliates. The value network of each country was validated by at least two relevant stakeholders from the respective country. RESULTS: The analysis revealed that the biggest challenge for countries with low POCT uptake was the lack of effective communication between the several organizations involved with POCT as well as the high workload for general practitioners (GPs) aiming to implement POCT. It is observed that countries with a single national authority responsible for POCT have a better uptake as they can govern the task of POCT roll-out and management and reduce the workload for GPs by assisting with set-up, quality control, training and support. CONCLUSION: Setting up a single national authority may be an effective step towards realizing the full benefits of POCT. Although it is possible for day-to-day operations to fall under the responsibility of the GP, this is only feasible if support and guidance are readily available to ensure that the workload associated with POCT is limited and as low as possible.

Implementation of medical tests in a Value-Based healthcare environment: A framework for delivering value.

Significant variation in the utilisation of medical tests is known to have an adverse impact on health outcomes and analysis of this variation is an important tool for quality assurance in healthcare. The introduction of a new medical test into a care pathway requires two distinct processes, termed adoption and implementation. One cause of the unwarranted variation in the use of medical tests is poor adoption and implementation. Adoption is the decision to acquire a technology and make it available to the users and is supported with evidence of clinical and cost effectiveness. Implementation is delivering the benefits promised in the business case, based on evidence of the impact of a test on each stakeholder involved in delivering the care pathway. The business case will have identified the benefits delivered to all stakeholders, as set out in a value proposition, and according to the quality domains typically addressed in quality improvement, namely clinical, process and structure (resource utilisation) outcomes. The outcome measures extend beyond those of clinical and cost effectiveness required for adoption. We describe an implementation framework which is designed to document the changes to the care pathway, the resource inputs and the expected outcomes with associated quality metrics.

Point-of-Care Testing for D-Dimer in the Diagnosis of Venous Thromboembolism in Primary Care: A Narrative Review.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is regarded as a significant cause of mortality and disability, affecting 1-2 per 1000 people annually, presenting with a relatively wide range of symptoms, which can pose a diagnostic challenge. Historically, people in whom VTE is suspected will have been taken to hospital for diagnosis and treatment; however, a high proportion of patients are found not to have VTE. Concerns have been expressed about potential delays in treatment, with the risk of additional morbidity and disability, and death. Diagnostic strategies are typically based on the use of a clinical prediction rule to determine the pre-test probability, complemented with a measurement of D-dimer, with confirmation by imaging assessment. This narrative review explores the literature on the use of point-of-care testing (POCT) for the measurement of D-dimer, as part of a clinical decision rule, for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in the primary care setting. In the two main prospective management (validation) studies that included D-dimer POCT or similar technologies, with a total cohort of 1600 participants, DVT was ruled out in 49% of patients, with a false negative rate of 1.4%, whereas PE was ruled out in 45% of patients, with a false negative rate of 1.5%. This suggests that uptake of POCT D-dimer in primary care has the potential to reduce the number of referrals to hospitals for imaging confirmatory investigation, with consequent cost savings. Thus, adopting POCT for D-dimer in primary care can offer clinical and cost benefits, particularly when quantitative POCT assays are being used. Furthermore, POCT should be undertaken in collaboration with the local laboratories to ensure the harmonisation of D-dimer methods and quality assurance to improve the diagnosis of VTE.

Where Is the Value of Laboratory Medicine and How Do You Unlock It?

BACKGROUND: The innovation pathway by which a newly discovered biomarker is developed into a medical test and used in routine clinical practice comprises a number of different processes split between 2 phases. The first follows on from biomarker discovery and involves the development of a robust analytical method, the accumulation of evidence to show its clinical and cost-effectiveness, and then adoption into clinical pathways. The second phase is one of implementation and sustainability, with active performance management to ensure that the test continues to deliver the benefits promised at the time of its adoption. CONTENT: To date there has been much more emphasis on the first phase of discovery and accumulation of evidence to demonstrate effectiveness. Insufficient attention has been paid to the second phase of translating that evidence into routine practice, with little real-world evidence to demonstrate the benefits to all of the stakeholders involved in delivering and receiving care. Changes in healthcare that include a move away from activity-based costing to a more value-based approach require more attention be paid to what happens after a test is adopted, including an understanding of the clinical pathway, the stakeholders within that pathway, and the benefits and "disbenefits" that accrue to these stakeholders. SUMMARY: The value proposition provides a guide for successful implementation of a test. Although it can address both adoption and implementation, it highlights that the requirements for test implementation are quite different to those of adoption, with an emphasis on real-world evidence and outcomes.

Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA Testing in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Value Proposition.

BACKGROUND: There is a need to improve personalized immunosuppression in organ transplantation to reduce premature graft loss. More efficient biomarkers are needed to better detect rejection, asymptomatic graft injury, and under-immunosuppression. Assessment of minimal necessary exposure to guide tapering and to prevent immune activation is also important. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) has become available for comprehensive monitoring of allograft integrity. A value proposition concept was applied to assess the potential benefits of dd-cfDNA to stakeholders (patient, transplant physician, laboratory medicine specialist, hospital management, insurance companies) involved in solid organ transplantation care. CONTENT: There is robust clinical evidence from more than 48 published studies supporting the role of dd-cfDNA for monitoring graft integrity and detection or exclusion of rejection. The value proposition framework was used to evaluate published key evidence regarding clinical validity, economic implications, and limitations of this approach. It has been shown that dd-cfDNA testing is essential for guiding earlier transplant injury intervention with potential for improved long-term outcome. SUMMARY: Monitoring dd-cfDNA offers a rapid and reproducible method to detect graft injuries at an early actionable stage without protocol biopsies and allows for more effective personalized immunosuppression. The appropriate use of dd-cfDNA testing can provide both clinical and economic benefits to all transplantation stakeholders.

A value proposition for natriuretic peptide measurement in the assessment of patients with suspected acute heart failure.

There is robust clinical trial evidence supporting the role of natriuretic peptides [NPs] in the assessment of patients presenting with suspected acute heart failure [AHF]. Despite the fact that clinical guidelines have for some time advocated NP measurement, the availability and uptake of NP testing in acute care services remains patchy and incomplete. The reasons for this are multifactorial but are underpinned by compartmentalised management and budget structures within complex healthcare delivery organisations. This paper outlines a value proposition for NP testing in the acute care setting which crosses the continuum of services and budgets. It articulates the expected benefits to each stakeholder in terms of efficiency of processes, clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness. It describes a pathway to implementation and suggests metrics that may be used to measure the effectiveness of introduction of NP testing. It is hoped that the value proposition will facilitate the uptake of NT testing fostering collaboration between laboratory, clinical, management and finance teams and by informing the development of business cases.

The value proposition for point-of-care testing in healthcare: HbA1c for monitoring in diabetes management as an exemplar.

Point-of-care testing (POCT) is a key enabling technology for disruptive and transformative innovation in healthcare, allowing tests to be performed quickly and close to the patient. This results in faster clinical decision making and new, more efficient models of care, with clinical, process and economic benefits potentially accruing to all stakeholders. Recognised barriers to the adoption of new technology such as POCT include poor understanding of current practice and thus the unmet need, the challenges of process change, and reluctance to disinvest in redundant resources resulting from improved pathway efficiency. Major contributors to this problem include a background of funding, organisation and management of healthcare that fails to recognise the complexity of a multiple stakeholder health economy seeking to become more outcomes-based and value driven. We examine the concept of a structured value proposition as a generic tool to achieve better adoption of POCT using as an example, the evidence that is available for the rapid measurement of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in the management of diabetes. We highlight the key components of the value proposition, identifying the impact of the test result on all stakeholders and the metrics which are required to define current practice (e.g. a laboratory-based HbA1c testing service), in order to develop the business case and the implementation plan required to demonstrate effective adoption of a POCT-based service. We conclude that the value proposition helps to identify the potential benefits to be gained from using POCT, and the stakeholders to whom they accrue.

Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care natriuretic peptide testing for chronic heart failure in ambulatory care: systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care natriuretic peptide tests in patients with chronic heart failure, with a focus on the ambulatory care setting. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Ovid Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Embase, Health Technology Assessment Database, Science Citation Index, and Conference Proceedings Citation Index until 31 March 2017. STUDY SELECTION: Eligible studies evaluated point-of-care natriuretic peptide testing (B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N terminal fragment pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP)) against any relevant reference standard, including echocardiography, clinical examination, or combinations of these, in humans. Studies were excluded if reported data were insufficient to construct 2×2 tables. No language restrictions were applied. RESULTS: 42 publications of 39 individual studies met the inclusion criteria and 40 publications of 37 studies were included in the analysis. Of the 37 studies, 30 evaluated BNP point-of-care testing and seven evaluated NTproBNP testing. 15 studies were done in ambulatory care settings in populations with a low prevalence of chronic heart failure. Five studies were done in primary care. At thresholds >100 pg/mL, the sensitivity of BNP, measured with the point-of-care index device Triage, was generally high and was 0.95 (95% confidence interval 0.90 to 0.98) at 100 pg/mL. At thresholds <100 pg/mL, sensitivity ranged from 0.46 to 0.97 and specificity from 0.31 to 0.98. Primary care studies that used NTproBNP testing reported a sensitivity of 0.99 (0.57 to 1.00) and specificity of 0.60 (0.44 to 0.74) at 135 pg/mL. No statistically significant difference in diagnostic accuracy was found between point-of-care BNP and NTproBNP tests. CONCLUSIONS: Given the lack of studies in primary care, the paucity of NTproBNP data, and potential methodological limitations in these studies, large scale trials in primary care are needed to assess the role of point-of-care natriuretic peptide testing and clarify appropriate thresholds to improve care of patients with suspected or chronic heart failure.

International definition of a point-of-care test in family practice: a modified e-Delphi procedure.

Background: The use of point-of-care tests (POCTs) in family practice is increasing, and the term POCT is often used in medical literature and clinical practice. Yet, no widely supported definition by several professional fields exists. Objective: To reach consensus on an international definition of a POCT in family practice. Methods: We performed a modified international e-Delphi procedure of four rounds among expert panel members from different professional backgrounds-family practitioners, laboratory specialists, policymakers, researchers and manufacturers. Results: Of 27 panel members from seven different countries, 26 participated in all rounds. Most panel members were active in POCT research or policymaking and 70% worked in family medicine. After choosing important components, structuring of answers and feedback, the following definition was chosen as the best or second best definition by 81% of panel members: a point-of-care test in family practice is a test to support clinical decision making, which is performed by a qualified member of the practice staff nearby the patient and on any part of the patient's body or its derivatives, during or very close to the time of consultation, to help the patient and physician to decide upon the best suited approach, and of which the results should be known at the time of the clinical decision making. Conclusion: The definition emerging from this study can inform family practitioners, laboratory specialists, policymakers and manufacturers on the most widely supported and recognized definition and could act as a clear starting point for the organization and execution of professional point-of-care testing in family practice worldwide.

Developing a value proposition for high-sensitivity troponin testing.

Laboratories are looking for ways that they can identify and deliver value through their service rather than just provide high quality test results. One way to demonstrate value has been described in the form of a value proposition where the application of a laboratory test is described explicitly in terms of the process of care and the patient outcomes. We have applied this concept to the use of high sensitivity troponin assays for the assessment of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. From a previously described framework we use a checklist to describe the various steps in the complete intervention or clinical pathway, demonstrating how the test should be used, highlighting key evidence in the literature that supports the intervention and list some of the measures which can be used to assess how well the intervention is being adopted and implemented. While the value proposition concept is based on the foundations of evidence based medicine it also requires collaboration between the laboratory and other stakeholders including clinicians to ensure that appropriate resources are applied across the complete clinical pathway in order to ensure its effectiveness.

Translational health economics: The key to accountable adoption of in vitro diagnostic technologies.

Adoption of new technologies, including diagnostic tests, is often considered not to deliver the expected return on investment. The reasons for this poor link between expectation and outcome include lack of evidence, variation in use of the technology, and an inability of the health system to manage the balance between investment and disinvestment associated with the change in care pathway. The challenges lie in the complex nature of healthcare provision where the investment is likely to be made in the jurisdiction of one stakeholder while the benefits (as well as dis-benefits) accrue to the other stakeholders. A prime example is found in the field of laboratory medicine and the use of diagnostic tests. The current economic tools employed in healthcare are primarily used to make policy and strategic decisions, particularly across health systems, and in purchaser and provider domains. These tools primarily involve cost effectiveness and budget impact analyses, both of which have been applied in health technology assessment of diagnostic technologies. However, they lack the granularity to translate findings down to the financial management and operational decision making at the provider department level. We propose an approach to translational health economics based on information derived from service line management and time-driven activity-based costing, identifying the resource utilisation for each of the units involved in the delivery of a care pathway, before and after adoption of new technology. This will inform investment and disinvestment decisions, along with identifying where the benefits, and dis-benefits, can be achieved for all stakeholders.

Improving the quality of point-of-care testing.

Background: It is suggested that new models of primary care should have better access to test results through the use of point-of-care testing (POCT). Objective: To determine whether quality management of POCT leads to better results. Methods: A comprehensive search of the literature on quality management of POCT in primary care, where the impact of participation in quality management programmes had been investigated with relevant outcome measures. Results: Three databases were systematically searched using key words relevant to POCT and quality management, covering from 1945 to January 2017. Titles and abstracts were reviewed for relevance and papers selected for review and data extraction. Five observational studies were found in which the performance of POCT for specific analytes in external quality assurance (EQA) programmes was used to assess improvement over a period of time, varying from 3.5 to 15 years. The tests monitored were HbA1c, urine albumin, C-reactive protein, glucose and haemoglobin. In each case, the performance of the test against defined analytical criteria was used to judge improvement in performance. Different summary performance criteria were used, including the imprecision of results over a period of time (two studies) and meeting defined target values for bias and imprecision of measurement (three studies). Performance improved with time and was associated with regular participation in EQA schemes and with the use of internal quality control (IQC) procedures. Conclusions: These findings indicate that adoption of quality management for POCT, including participation in IQC and EQA, with the support of laboratory medicine professionals, will improve the quality of the results 'produced'.