Comparing fetal biometric growth velocity versus estimated fetal weight for prediction of neonatal small for gestational age.

OBJECTIVE: Growth velocities derived from fetal biometrics have been proposed to improve prediction of small for gestational age (SGA) neonates. We sought to determine if ultrasound growth velocities for abdominal circumference (AC) and estimated fetal weight (EFW) improve the prediction of SGA infants when compared to using EFW alone. STUDY DESIGN: This is a secondary analysis from a prospective study of women referred for growth ultrasounds during the third trimester. Growth velocities for AC and EFW were derived from the difference in Z-scores between measurements at the anatomy survey (18-22 weeks gestation) and later growth ultrasound (26-36 weeks gestation). Change in AC and EFW growth velocities <10th percentile were compared with prenatally suspected SGA from Hadlock EFW <10th percentile for prediction of SGA neonates. The primary outcome was defined as the sensitivity and specificity of the growth velocities and Hadlock EFW in predicting SGA neonates. Logistic regression modeling was used to determine if the growth velocities improved prediction of neonatal SGA. Area under the ROC curves (AUC) were determined and compared. RESULTS: Of 612 singleton pregnancies meeting inclusion criteria, 68 (11.1%) resulted in SGA neonates. Hadlock EFW <10th percentile had higher sensitivity and specificity when compared to AC growth velocity and EFW growth velocity. Only AC growth velocity and Hadlock EFW had significant odds ratios for association with neonatal SGA. The AUC were 0.54, 0.53, and 0.61 using AC growth velocity, EFW growth velocity, and Hadlock EFW, respectively. The AUC did not significantly improve when the growth velocities were combined with Hadlock EFW (0.63). Adjustment of Z-scores for gestational age at anatomy scan or third trimester growth scan did not significantly change these results (AUC = 0.69). CONCLUSION: EFW determined by Hadlock formula has the highest predictive value in detecting SGA neonates when compared to both AC and EFW growth velocities.

Enhancing Adherence to Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines at a Student-Run Free Clinic.

Women who lack health insurance have much lower rates of cervical cancer screening and higher rates of cervical cancer than insured women. The current screening rate for insured patients is 86.9%, while the rate for uninsured women is 68.2%. Student-run free clinics may help increase the rates of cervical cancer screening in uninsured women. As screening rates in this setting are uncertain, this study was performed to determine rates of cervical cancer screening at a student-run free clinic, and therefore determine its effectiveness in increasing screening rates in uninsured women. A retrospective chart review was conducted among female patients ages 21-64 at a student-run free clinic to determine how many patients were up-to-date with cervical cancer screening per American Cancer Society (ACS) guidelines. A total of 239 women were included in the retrospective chart review. At their most recent visit, 87.9% of clinic patients were up-to-date on cervical cancer screening. This screening rate is higher than both the reported uninsured (68.2%) and insured (86.9%) national screening rates in the United States. Although there are multiple barriers that prevent uninsured patients from undergoing cervical cancer screenings, screening rates at our student-run free clinic are higher than national screening rates. This higher screening rate can be attributed to a standardized screening system, access to resources including Pap tests provided by community partners, and the clinic's ability to longitudinally follow patients. However, there remain areas for improvement, such as reducing no-show rates and ensuring that staff screen for cervical cancer at each visit.

Addressing Breast Cancer Screening Disparities Among Uninsured and Insured Patients: A Student-Run Free Clinic Initiative.

Mammography rates among the uninsured are less than half of those among insured patients as reported by American Cancer Society (Breast cancer facts & figures 2017-2018, American Cancer Society, Inc., Atlanta, 2017). This may stem from high costs of and limited access to a usual place for health care, which may portend delayed breast cancer diagnoses and poorer outcomes among uninsured women. Student-run free clinics provide opportunities for uninsured patients to establish a medical home, thereby increasing access to preventative health care. The purpose of this study is to determine the rates of breast cancer screening at a student-run free clinic and compare them to national averages. A retrospective chart review was conducted using patients of BRIDGE Healthcare Clinic who were women ages 40-75 years between January 2012 and March 2018. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, date of mammogram, and screening results. A total of 194 women 40 years or older were included in the review. Overall, of the 157 women who were 45 years or older at their most recent visit, 75.5% were up-to-date according to guidelines set forth by the American Cancer Society. These values are well above the reported national rates in insured and uninsured women (21%, 53%, respectively) as reported by American Cancer Society (Breast cancer facts & figures 2017-2018, American Cancer Society, Inc., Atlanta, 2017). Of the patients who obtained screening mammograms, 84.5% utilized BRIDGE Healthcare Clinic's program. Volunteer providers are often the sole source of health care for a substantial portion of uninsured patients, who may have unmet preventative health needs. As such, the findings of this study suggest that student-run free clinics play an important role in increasing uninsured patients' access to mammograms. The breast cancer screening program described herein may serve as an example for implementation by other student-run free clinics.