Racial and ethnic differences in knowledge and willingness to participate in HIV vaccine trials in an urban population in the Southeastern US.

Racial/ethnic minorities in the Southeastern USA are disproportionately affected by HIV, and would benefit from a preventive vaccine. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 220 community college students in Atlanta to evaluate racial/ethnic differences in knowledge and willingness to participate in HIV vaccine trials. Willingness to participate did not differ by race/ethnicity, age, or gender, and was not associated with knowledge. African-Americans and Asians were more likely than Whites to: believe that an HIV vaccine exists, but is being withheld from the public; believe that AIDS was caused by a government conspiracy; feel that having other participants and investigators of their ethnic background in the trial was important. Misconceptions regarding HIV vaccines are common and differ by race/ethnicity. However, willingness to participate was not associated with knowledge or race/ethnicity. Efforts to increase participation should address the ethnic diversity of the trial personnel, and education to eliminate misconceptions about HIV vaccines and trials.

Rapid HIV testing and counseling for voluntary testing centers in Africa.

OBJECTIVE: Voluntary HIV testing and counseling (VTC) has been shown to reduce the incidence of HIV in cohabiting couples who now represent the majority of new infections in many African cities. Community and client perceptions of a 1-day voluntary testing and counseling program in Lusaka, Zambia, were assessed, and a rapid HIV-testing algorithm was evaluated for VTC centers. METHODS AND DESIGN: Between May 1995 and June 1996, outreach workers distributed written invitations door to door. The 1-day program was held 6 days/week including weekends. Transport, child care and lunch were provided. Community and client surveys followed in July 1996. RESULTS: Over 3500 couples married for a median of 4-5 years requested testing: 23% were HIV+/+, 57% were HIV-/- and 20% were discordant with one HIV+ and one HIV- partner. Sixty-eight per cent of couples surveyed had made the decision to be tested before attending the 1-day program and 80% had not previously known where to obtain HIV testing. Knowledge that couples could show discordant results rose from 29 before to 88% after pretest counseling. Clients reported high levels of satisfaction with the services and 90 out of 99 (92%) preferred to receive their results the same day. Clients at another center who waited 10 days for their results reported more fear, and 19 out of 31 (61%) would have preferred to get their results the same day. Over 99% of those who attended the program thought active promotion of voluntary HIV testing in the community was a positive thing, as did 90% of those who were invited but did not attend. Sensitivity and specificity of the rapid test algorithm were both 99.4% in this setting. CONCLUSIONS: Active promotion of voluntary HIV testing and counseling in couples is needed to reduce the spread of HIV in high-prevalence areas. The use of rapid, on-site HIV testing allows clients to receive result-specific counseling in a single visit. Ongoing quality control of a subset of samples at an outside laboratory is essential.

PIP: Voluntary, confidential HIV testing and counseling centers (VTCs) are becoming increasingly popular in African cities with high HIV prevalence. This strategy is especially effective among HIV-discordant couples. During a 12-month period during 1995-96, community outreach workers distributed written invitations to attend a VTC in Lusaka, Zambia, in which couples would receive testing and result-specific counseling in a single visit; transportation, child care, and lunch were offered. Over 3500 couples, one-third of those invited, responded to the invitation and underwent rapid HIV testing. The Dipstick HIV-1 + 2 rapid test was used for screening and the Capillus HIV-1/HIV-2 rapid test was employed for confirmation. Both partners were HIV-positive in 23% of cases and both were HIV-negative in 57%; in the remaining 20% of couples, 1 partner was HIV-positive and the other was uninfected. 68% of participating couples had decided to seek HIV testing before receiving notice of the VTC, but 80% of them did not know where to obtain such services. Couples who attended the VTC that offered same-day test results reported substantially less fear than those who had to wait 10 days for their results. 99% of those who participated in the program thought active community promotion of VTC was desirable, as did 90% of those who were invited but did not attend. The rapid test algorithm had both a sensitivity and specificity of 99.4%. Continued retesting of a subset of samples at an outside laboratory remains essential, however. This intervention is associated with an estimated cost of US $84 per HIV infection prevented.

Management of pelvic inflammatory disease by primary care physicians. A comparison with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines.

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention published recommendations for clinicians on the management of pelvic inflammatory disease, but it is unknown if providers are aware of the guidelines or follow them. GOAL: To compare pelvic inflammatory disease screening, diagnosis, treatment, and reporting practices among primary care physicians with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for pelvic inflammatory disease. STUDY DESIGN: A weighted random sample of California primary care physicians surveyed in November 1992 and January 1993. RESULTS: Of the 1,165 physicians surveyed, 553 (48%) returned completed questionnaires. Among respondents, 302 (55%) reported having treated a case of pelvic inflammatory disease during the last 12 months, and of these, 52% answered that they were unsure of or do not follow the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for pelvic inflammatory disease. Pediatricians and those with more years since residency were less likely to deviate from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for pelvic inflammatory disease, and family practitioners were more likely to deviate from the guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic inflammatory disease is commonly encountered by primary care physicians in California. Training and experience were important predictors of compliance with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations; however, substantial divergence from the guidelines occurs.