Dorsal root entry zone lesioning for brachial plexus avulsion - technical evolution and long-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Brachial plexus avulsion (BPA) injuries can cause severe deafferentation pain. This has been successfully treated with dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) lesioning. Distortions in anatomy following a BPA injury can make identifying neural structures challenging. We describe a modification to the operative technique that improves the surgical view and the advanced intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) employed to identify DREZ. We have analysed the long-term outcomes for pain, quality of life, and complications in patients undergoing DREZ lesioning. METHODS: This is a single-centre retrospective case series including patients who underwent DREZ lesioning with IONM for brachial plexus avulsion between 2012 and 2022. Analysed data included pre- and postoperative pain (VAS), quality of life score for chronic pain, and complications. The evolution of the surgical approach is discussed. RESULTS: 44 consecutive patients underwent a DREZ lesioning procedure with intraoperative monitoring and mapping. In these patients the mean VAS score improved from 8.9 (7-10) to 1.87 (0-6) (p < 0.0001) at the time of discharge. 31 patients were followed-up for more than 12 months with a mean duration of follow-up of 41 months and their results were as follows: the mean VAS improved from 9.0 (7-10) to 4.1 (0-9) (p < 0.0001) at the last follow-up and the mean QOL values improved from 3.7 (2-6) to 7.4 (4-10) (p < 0.0001). The long-term outcomes were 'good' in 39%, 'fair' in 29% and 'poor' in 32% of patients. 55% of the patients were able to stop or reduce pain medications. CONCLUSIONS: Modifications of surgical technique provide better exposure of DREZ, and IONM aids in identifying DREZ in the presence of severe intra-dural changes. Long-term outcomes of DREZ lesioning indicate not only a reduction in pain but also a significant improvement in quality of life.

Open Thoracic Cordotomy for Cancer Pain with Intraoperative Neuromonitoring: A Case Series and Critical Review of the Literature.

OBJECTIVE: Cordotomy is a viable option for patients with intractable cancer pain and limited survival. Open thoracic cordotomy is offered when patients are not candidates for percutaneous cordotomy. After the open procedure, traditionally performed purely based on anatomic landmarks, up to 22% of patients experience postoperative limb weakness. The objective of this study is to report our experience with neurophysiology-guided open cordotomy along with a critical review of the literature. METHODS: Between 2019 and 2022, 5 open thoracic cordotomies were performed in our center. Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring was used in all cases to guide the lesion and standard single-level laminectomy or hemilaminectomy was performed for exposure. Outcome measures were retrospectively reviewed focusing on pain control and neurologic status. Existing literature on cordotomy was critically reviewed. RESULTS: There was satisfactory pain relief with preservation of motor function in all 5 cases. Temperature sensation was preserved in all but 1 patient, who lost it after the previous ipsilateral percutaneous cordotomy (PCC). No procedural complications were experienced. We found that the neurophysiology monitoring lesion was guided anterior compared with what would have been lesioned on an anatomic basis. CONCLUSIONS: Open thoracic cordotomy is a safe and effective procedure for intractable cancer-related pain. Technical advancements significantly reduced mortality and major morbidity of PCC. Our series suggests that neurophysiology monitoring alters the location of the lesion and may help better targeting of pain fibers within the spinothalamic tract and preserve other long tracts. The safety profile of open cordotomy with neurophysiology compares favorably with the PCC.

Protocol for an observational cohort study investigating biomarkers predicting seizure recurrence following a first unprovoked seizure in adults.

INTRODUCTION: A first unprovoked seizure is a common presentation, reliably identifying those that will have recurrent seizures is a challenge. This study will be the first to explore the combined utility of serum biomarkers, quantitative electroencephalogram (EEG) and quantitative MRI to predict seizure recurrence. This will inform patient stratification for counselling and the inclusion of high-risk patients in clinical trials of disease-modifying agents in early epilepsy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: 100 patients with first unprovoked seizure will be recruited from a tertiary neuroscience centre and baseline assessments will include structural MRI, EEG and a blood sample. As part of a nested pilot study, a subset of 40 patients will have advanced MRI sequences performed that are usually reserved for patients with refractory chronic epilepsy. The remaining 60 patients will have standard clinical MRI sequences. Patients will be followed up every 6 months for a 24-month period to assess seizure recurrence. Connectivity and network-based analyses of EEG and MRI data will be carried out and examined in relation to seizure recurrence. Patient outcomes will also be investigated with respect to analysis of high-mobility group box-1 from blood serum samples. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by North East-Tyne & Wear South Research Ethics Committee (20/NE/0078) and funded by an Association of British Neurologists and Guarantors of Brain clinical research training fellowship. Findings will be presented at national and international meetings published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NIHR Clinical Research Network's (CRN) Central Portfolio Management System (CPMS)-44976.

Getting going on time: reducing neurophysiology set-up times in order to contribute to improving surgery start and finish times.

At the Walton Centre we conduct a relatively large number of complex and lengthy elective (booked) spinal operations. Recently, we have had a particular problem with half or more of these sessions finishing late, resulting in staff discontent and greater use of on-call staff.These operations require patient monitoring by neurophysiology clinical scientists. Before the surgeon can start the operation, in-theatre neurophysiological measurements are required to establish a baseline. We reasoned that reducing this set-up time would reduce the risk of surgery starting late, and so the whole session finishing later than expected.In this project we redesigned the neurophysiology parts of in-theatre patient preparation. We conducted five Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles over 3 months, reducing the duration of pre-surgery preparation from a mean of 70 min to around 50 min. We saw improvements in surgical start times and session finish times (both earlier by roughly comparable amounts). The ultimately impact is that we saw on-time session finishes improve from around 50% to 100%. Following this project, we have managed to sustain the changes and the improved performance.The most impactful change was to conduct in-theatre neurophysiology patient preparation simultaneously with anaesthesia, rather than waiting for this to finish; when we performed this with a pair of clinical scientists, we were able to complete neurophysiology patient preparation by the time the anaesthetist was finished, therefore not introducing delays to the start of surgery. A final change was to remove a superfluous preparatory patient-baseline measurement.This is a very challenging and complex environment, with powerful stakeholders and many factors and unpredictable events affecting sessions. Nevertheless, we have shown that we can make improvements within our span of influence that improve the wider process. While using pairs of staff requires greater resource, we found the benefit to be worthwhile.