Trends in emergency department visits during cold weather seasons among patients experiencing homelessness in Ontario, Canada: a retrospective population-based cohort study.

PURPOSE: Recent anecdotal reports suggest increasing numbers of people experiencing homelessness are visiting emergency departments (EDs) during cold weather seasons due to inadequate shelter availability. We examined monthly ED visits among patients experiencing homelessness to determine whether there has been a significant increase in such visits in 2022/2023 compared to prior years. METHODS: We used linked health administrative data to identify cohorts experiencing homelessness in Ontario between October and March of the 2018/2019 to 2022/2023 years. We analyzed the monthly rate of non-urgent ED visits as a proxy measure of visits plausibly attributable to avoidance of cold exposure, examining rates among patients experiencing homelessness compared to housed patients. We excluded visits for overdose or COVID-19. We assessed level and significance of change in the 2022/2023 year as compared to previous cold weather seasons using Poisson regression. RESULTS: We identified a total of 21,588 non-urgent ED visits across the observation period among patients experiencing homelessness in Ontario. Non-urgent ED visits increased 27% (RR 1.24 [95% CI 1.14-1.34]) in 2022/2023 compared to previous cold weather seasons. In Toronto, such visits increased by 70% (RR 1.68 [95% CI 1.57-1.80]). Among housed patients, non-urgent ED visits did not change significantly during this time period. CONCLUSION: Rates of ED visits plausibly attributable to avoidance of cold exposure by individuals experiencing homelessness increased significantly in Ontario in 2022/2023, most notably in Toronto. This increase in ED visits may be related to inadequate access to emergency shelter beds and warming services in the community.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIFS: Des rapports anecdotiques récents suggèrent qu'un nombre croissant de personnes en situation d'itinérance visitent les services d'urgence (SU) pendant les saisons froides en raison de la disponibilité insuffisante d'hébergement d'urgence. Nous avons examiné les visites mensuelles aux urgences chez les personnes en situation d'itinérance afin de déterminer s'il y a eu une augmentation significative de ces visites en 2022-2023 par rapport aux années précédentes. MéTHODES: Nous avons utilisé des données administratives de santé liées pour identifier les cohortes de personnes en situation d'itinérance en Ontario entre octobre et mars des années 2018/2019 à 2022/2023. Nous avons analysé le taux mensuel de visites aux urgences non urgentes comme mesure approximative des visites vraisemblablement attribuables à l'évitement de l'exposition au froid, en examinant les taux chez les personnes en situation d'itinérance par rapport aux patients logés. Nous avons exclu les visites pour surdose ou COVID-19. Nous avons évalué le niveau et l'importance du changement dans l'année 2022/2023 par rapport aux saisons froides précédentes en utilisant la régression de Poisson. RéSULTATS: Nous avons recensé un total de 21 588 visites non urgentes aux urgences au cours de la période d'observation chez des personnes en situation d'itinérance en Ontario. Les visites aux urgences non urgentes ont augmenté de 27 % (RR 1,24 [IC à 95 % 1,14-1,34]) en 2022­2023 par rapport aux saisons froides précédentes. À Toronto, ces visites ont augmenté de 70 % (RR 1,68 [IC à 95 % 1,57-1,80]). Parmi les patients logés, les visites aux urgences non urgentes n'ont pas changé de façon significative pendant cette période. CONCLUSIONS: Les taux de visites aux urgences attribuables vraisemblablement à l'évitement de l'exposition au froid par les personnes en situation d'itinérance ont augmenté considérablement en Ontario en 2022­2023, surtout à Toronto. Cette augmentation du nombre de visites aux urgences peut être liée à un accès inadéquat aux lits des refuges d'urgence et aux services de réchauffement dans la collectivité.

Beyond Housing: Supporting the Health and Well-Being of Individuals Residing in Toronto's Temporary Shelter Hotels.

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the City of Toronto opened temporary shelter hotels with on-site supports for people previously living on the street, in encampments or in emergency shelters. The Beyond Housing program was created to enhance service offerings in the shelter hotel system and to support people not engaging with services. Using a Housing First approach, Beyond Housing offers three main interventions: (1) case management, (2) care coordination and (3) on-site and community-based mental health and social supports. This commentary explores the strengths and challenges of implementing Beyond Housing within temporary shelter hotels, and then discusses the lessons learned.

Navigator programme for hospitalised adults experiencing homelessness: protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: People experiencing homelessness suffer from poor outcomes after hospitalisation due to systemic barriers to care, suboptimal transitions of care, and intersecting health and social burdens. Case management programmes have been shown to improve housing stability, but their effects on broad posthospital outcomes in this population have not been rigorously evaluated. The Navigator Programme is a Critical Time Intervention case management programme that was developed to help homeless patients with their postdischarge needs and to link them with community-based health and social services. This randomised controlled trial examines the impact of the Navigator Programme on posthospital outcomes among adults experiencing homelessness. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a pragmatic randomised controlled trial testing the effectiveness of the Navigator Programme at an urban academic teaching hospital and an urban community teaching hospital in Toronto, Canada. Six hundred and forty adults experiencing homelessness who are admitted to the hospital will be randomised to receive support from a Homeless Outreach Counsellor for 90 days after hospital discharge or to usual care. The primary outcome is follow-up with a primary care provider (physician or nurse practitioner) within 14 days of hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes include postdischarge mortality or readmission, number of days in hospital, number of emergency department visits, self-reported care transition quality, and difficulties meeting subsistence needs. Quantitative outcomes are being collected over a 180-day period through linked patient-reported and administrative health data. A parallel mixed-methods process evaluation will be conducted to explore intervention context, implementation and mechanisms of impact. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the Unity Health Toronto Research Ethics Board. Participants will be required to provide written informed consent. Results of the main trial and process evaluation will be reported in peer-reviewed journals and shared with hospital leadership, community partners and policy makers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04961762.

Factors Associated with Readmission Among General Internal Medicine Patients Experiencing Homelessness.

BACKGROUND: People who are homeless have a higher burden of illness and higher rates of hospital admission and readmission compared to the general population. Identifying the factors associated with hospital readmission could help healthcare providers and policymakers improve post-discharge care for homeless patients. OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with hospital readmission within 90 days of discharge from a general internal medicine unit among patients experiencing homelessness. DESIGN: This prospective observational study was conducted at an urban academic teaching hospital in Toronto, Canada. Interviewer-administered questionnaires and chart reviews were completed to assess medical, social, processes of care, and hospitalization data. Multivariable logistic regression with backward selection was used to identify factors associated with a subsequent readmission and estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (N = 129) who were admitted to the general internal medicine service between November 2017 and November 2018 and who were homeless at the time of admission. MAIN MEASURES: Unplanned all-cause readmission to the study hospital within 90 days of discharge. KEY RESULTS: Thirty-five of 129 participants (27.1%) were readmitted within 90 days of discharge. Factors associated with lower odds of readmission included having an active case manager (adjusted odds ratios [aOR]: 0.31, 95% CI, 0.13-0.76), having informal support such as friends and family (aOR: 0.25, 95% CI, 0.08-0.78), and sending a copy of the patient's discharge plan to a primary care physician who had cared for the patient within the last year (aOR: 0.44, 95% CI, 0.17-1.16). A higher number of medications prescribed at discharge was associated with higher odds of readmission (aOR: 1.12, 95% CI, 1.02-1.23). CONCLUSION: Interventions to reduce hospital readmission for people who are homeless should evaluate tailored discharge planning and dedicated resources to support implementation of these plans in the community.

Understanding Housing Delays and Relocations Within the Housing First Model.

This study explores factors contributing to delays and relocations during the implementation of the Housing First model in Toronto, Ontario. While interruptions in housing tenure are expected en route to recovery and housing stability, consumer and service provider views on finding and keeping housing remain largely unknown. In-person interviews and focus groups were conducted with 48 study participants, including 23 case managers or housing workers and 25 consumers. The following three factors contributed to housing delays and transfers: (1) the effectiveness of communication and collaboration among consumers and service providers, (2) consumer-driven preferences and ambivalence, and (3) provider prioritization of consumer choice over immediate housing access. Two strategies--targeted communications and consumer engagement in housing searches--supported the housing process. Several factors affect the timing and stability of housing. Communication between and among providers and consumers, and a shared understanding of consumer choice, can further support choice and recovery.

Research Assistants Caught in Limbo: Considering Their Role in Quantitative, Longitudinal Research with Vulnerable Populations.

Research assistants (RAs) play a variety of roles that are critical in making research happen and in determining its quality and effectiveness. Yet their locus of power in the production of knowledge stands in sharp contrast to their relative powerlessness in the hierarchical research organization. This article explores the experiences of RAs engaged in a randomized controlled longitudinal field trial of a Housing First intervention for individuals experiencing homelessness and mental illness in Toronto. They encountered several unexpected effects of navigating the power ascribed to them by both study participants and community service providers. This study underscores the importance of acknowledging that RAs are the face of the research study in the field, and of better understanding implications associated with that fact, especially when marginalized populations and their providers are involved.