Response predictors to cardiac resynchronization therapy in chronic heart failure: a 10-year-cardiovascular center experience.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been established as an effective therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Randomized clinical trials have shown its impact on mortality and HF hospitalizations, as well as improvement of symptoms and quality of life. OBJECTIVES: Finding clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic variables that may predict the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). METHODS: We performed a single-center, observational, analytic, and retrospective study that included 102 patients with heart failure (HF) diagnosis who underwent CRT according to guideline-directed therapy from January 2010 to April 2020 in a third-level center. CRT response was defined as an improvement of New York Heart Association functional class in at least 1 category associated with a recovery of ≥ 5% in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). RESULTS: Our study population was 102 patients of which 61 (59.8%) were men. The mean age at HF diagnosis was 54 ± 18.7 years. Ischemic heart disease was the etiology in 37 (36.3%) cases. Fifty-one (50%) patients were classified as responders. Responders had wider QRS, and lower LVEF and right ventricular fractional area change at baseline. After CRT, responders had a greater reduction of QRS duration, and improvement in LVEF, global longitudinal strain, and echocardiographic dyssynchrony parameters. Multivariate regression analysis showed that left bundle branch block (LBBB), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), and baseline difference of pre-ejection periods were predictors of a positive response to CRT in this population. CONCLUSIONS: LBBB, TAPSE, LVEDV, and pre-ejection time difference are independent variables that can predict adequate response to CRT.

ANTECEDENTES: La terapia de resincronización cardíaca (TRC) se ha establecido como una terapia efectiva para la insuficiencia cardíaca con fracción de eyección reducida. Ensayos clínicos aleatorizados han demostrado su impacto en la mortalidad y hospitalizaciones por insuficiencia cardíaca, así como la mejora de los síntomas y la calidad de vida. OBJETIVOS: Determinar las variables clínicas, electrocardiográficas y ecocardiográficas que puedan predecir la respuesta a la terapia de resincronización cardíaca (TRC). MÉTODO: Estudio unicéntrico, observacional, analítico, retrospectivo, que incluyó 102 pacientes con diagnóstico de IC sometidos a TRC y terapia dirigida por guías, de enero de 2010 a abril de 2020, en un centro de tercer nivel. La respuesta a TRC fue definida como mejoría de la clase funcional de la New York Heart Association en al menos 1 categoría, asociado con una recuperación ≥ 5% en la fracción de expulsión del ventrículo izquierdo (FEVI). RESULTADOS: Incluimos a 102 pacientes, 61 (59.8%) fueron hombres. El promedio de edad al diagnóstico de IC fue 54 ± 18.7 años. La cardiopatía isquémica fue la etiología en 37 (36.3%) pacientes. 51 (50%) pacientes, fueron clasificados como respondedores. Los respondedores presentaron QRS amplio, menor FEVI y menor fracción de acortamiento del ventrículo derecho al inicio del estudio. Después de la TRC, los respondedores tuvieron una mayor reducción en la duración del QRS, mejoría en la FEVI, strain longitudinal global y parámetros de disincronía ecocardiográfica. El análisis de regresión multivariado mostró que el bloqueo de rama izquierdo (BRI), el volumen telediastólico del ventrículo izquierdo (VTDVI) la excursión sistólica del plano anular tricuspídeo (TAPSE) y la diferencia basal del período expulsivo fueron predictores de respuesta positiva a TRC. CONCLUSIONES: BRI, TAPSE, VTDVI y la diferencia basal de períodos preexpulsivos son variables independientes que predicen respuesta adecuada a TRC.

Peripheral Immunophenotype in IgG4-Related Disease and Its Association with Clinical Phenotypes and Disease Activity.

Diverse immune cell subsets have been described in IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD). If there is a different immunophenotype according to clinical phenotype and activity status is not known. Levels of IL-4-, IL-13-, IL-5-, and IL-21-producing CD4+ T cells (Th2 subsets), CD4+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CD4+CTLs), T helper 9 cells, T follicular helper cells (Tfh; Tfh1/Tfh2/Tfh17/Tf regulatory [Tfr]), Foxp3+ regulatory T cells, Type 1 regulatory T cells (Tr1), T helper 3 regulatory cells (Th3), IL-10-producing regulatory B cells (Bregs), IL-10-expressing regulatory plasmacytoid dendritic (pDC IL-10+) cells, and M1 and M2 monocytes were determined by flow cytometry in 43 IgG4-RD patients and 12 controls. All immune subsets were higher in patients vs. controls. CD4+/IL-4+, CD4+/IL-5+, CD4+CTLs, Tfh2, Tfh17, Tfr, and M1 monocyte cell number was different among IgG4-RD clinical phenotypes. The pancreato-hepato-biliary phenotype was characterized by a higher CD4+CTLs, Tfh17, Tfh2, and Tfr and lower M1 cell number. An increased CD4+CTLs and Th3 cell number distinguished the head and neck-limited phenotype, while the retroperitoneal/aortic and Mikulicz/systemic phenotypes were characterized by increased Th2 subsets. Tfh17, Tr1, Th3, pDC, M1, and M2 monocytes were augmented in active patients. In summary, the clinical heterogeneity of IgG4-RD might be driven by the participation of different immunophenotypes and, consequently, by a different fibroinflammatory process.

Common hematological values predict unfavorable outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

COVID-19 can range from asymptomatic to life-threatening. Early identification of patients who will develop severe disease is crucial. A number of scores and indexes have been developed to predict severity. However, most rely on measurements not readily available. We evaluated hematological and biochemical markers taken on admission and determined how predictive they were of development of critical illness or death. We observed that higher values of readily available tests, including neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio; derived neutrophil index; and troponin I were associated with a higher risk of death or critical care admission (P < 0.001). We show that common hematological tests can be helpful in determining early in the course of illness which patients are likely to develop severe forms, as well as allocating resources to those patients early, while avoiding overuse of limited resources in patients with reduced risk of progression to severe disease.

Expression of TOB/BTG family members in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

In recent years, the role of anti-proliferative TOB proteins in the regulation of immune response by inhibiting T cell activation has been demonstrated. Nevertheless, no previous studies have explored their expression in patients with IBD. The aim of the study was to characterize the gene and protein expression of the TOB/BTG family in intestinal tissue of patients with IBD. This is an observational and cross-sectional study that included 63 IBD patients. Gene expression of TOB/BTG family was measured by RT-PCR. Protein expression of TOB/CD16 and BTG/Ki-67 was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. TOB/BTG family mRNAs were detected and quantitated by RT-qPCR in rectal and ileum biopsies from UC patients and CD patients, respectively, and non-inflammatory control tissues. Results showed that TOB1 and BTG1 gene expression was decreased in the colonic mucosa from patients with UC compared with the control group. The TOB2 and BTG2 genes were over-expressed in the colonic mucosa of patients with UC in remission compared with the active UC and control group. The high TOB2 gene expression was associated with histological remission (P = .01). TOB1/CD16, TOB2/CD16, BTG1/Ki-67, BTG2/Ki-67 and BTG4/Ki-67 single and double positive cells were mostly NK, macrophages, epithelial cells, connective tissue cells and perivascular inflammatory infiltrates in tissues from patients with UC and CD. This is the first depiction of the TOB/BTG family gene and protein expression in rectal and ileum tissues by a CD16+ subpopulation in IBD.