[Analysis of evaluation process of research projects submitted to the Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria, Spain]. / Análisis del proceso evaluador de los proyectos de investigación en el Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria.

BACKGROUND: At the present time it seems very clear that research improvement is both an unquestionable fact and the right way to develop technological innovation, services and patents. However, such improvement and corresponding finances needs to be done under fine and rigorous evaluation process as an assessment tool under which all the research projects applying to a public or private call for proposals should be submitted to assure a coherence point according to the investment to be made. At this end, the main target of this work has been focused to analysis and study the evaluation process traditionally made by Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria (FIS) as well as to propose most adequate modifications. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A sample of 431 research projects corresponding to year 1998 proposal was analysed. The evaluation from FIS and ANEP (National Evaluation and Prospective Agency) was evaluated and scored (evaluation quality) in its main contents by 3 independent evaluators, the showed results submitted to a comparative frame between these agencies at indoor (FIS) and outdoor (FIS/ANEP) level. RESULTS: FIS evaluation had 20 commissions or areas of knowledge. The analysis indoor (FIS) clearly showed that evaluation quality was correlated to the assigned commission (F = 3.71; p < 0.001) and to the time last of the researched proposal (F = 3.42; p < 0.05) but no related to the evaluator. On the other hand, the quality of ANEP evaluation showed a correlated dependency of the three mentioned facts. In all terms, the ANEP evaluation was better than FIS for the three years time projects, but in did not show significant differences in one or two years time projects. In all cases, the evaluation with final results as negative (financing denied) showed an average quality higher than positive evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: The obtained results advice about the convenience of making some changes in the evaluative structure and to review the sort of FIS technical commissions focusing an improvement of the evaluation process.

[Familial and hereditary mesangial glomerulonephritis with IgA deposits (author's transl)]. / Glomerulonefritis mesangial con depósitos de IgA, familiar y hereditaria.

Idiopathic mesangial glomerulonephritis with IgA deposits was observed in two relatives, father and son, in a family of 5 members. In the father the disease started at age 43 with relapsing macroscopic hematuria, proteinuria, renal failure and hypertension, with a progressive course in the ensuing four years. The affected son, the oldest of three brothers, developed relapsing macroscopic hematuria at age 16; two years later renal function was normal and there was no hypertension, but microhematuria persisted without proteinuria. The mother and the other two brothers had no clinical or biological signs of renal disease. Serum immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA, and IgM) and complement (C3, C4, C3 proactivator) were normal in the patients and their relatives. Histocompatibility typing demonstrated the presence of HLA-Bw35 in the father and the two unaffected sons, being negative in the mother and the affected son. The analysis of HLA-Bw35 in 23 patients with IgA mesangial glomerulonephritis gave positive results in 30% of them, while the control group had a positivity of 15% (p non significant with the X2 test). The present observations suggest that IgA mesangial glomerulonephritis is a potentially familial and hereditary renal disease. HLA-Bw35 antigen appears not to be a genetic marker of the disease in our geographical area.