Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
J Radiol Prot ; 39(3): 809-824, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31234160

ABSTRACT

Interventional radiology and cardiology are widespread employed techniques for diagnosis and treatment of several pathologies because they avoid the majority of the side-effects associated with surgical treatments, but are known to increase the radiation exposure to patient and operators. In recent years many studies treated the exposure of the operators performing cardiological procedures. The aim of this work is to study the exposure condition of the medical staff in some selected interventional radiology procedures. The Monte Carlo simulations have been employed with anthropomorphic mathematical phantoms reproducing the irradiation scenario of the medical staff with two operators and the patient. A personal dosemeter, put on apron, was modelled for comparison with measurements performed in hospitals, done with electronic dosemeters, in a reduced number of interventional radiology practices. Within the limits associated to the use of numerical anthropomorphic models to mimic a complex interventional procedure, the personal dose equivalent, H p (10), was evaluated and normalised to the simulated Kerma-Area Product, KAP, value, indeed the effective dose has been calculated. The H p (10)/KAPvalue of the first operator is about 10 µSv/Gy.cm2, when ceiling shielding is not used. This value is calculated on the trunk and it varies of +/-30% moving the dosemeter to the waist or to the neck. The effective dose, normalised to the KAP value, varies between 0.03 and 0.4 µSv/Gy.cm2. Considering all the unavoidable approximation of this kind of investigations, the comparisons with hospital measurement and literature data showed a good agreement allowing to use of the present results for dosimetric characterisation of interventional radiology procedures.


Subject(s)
Medical Staff , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Radiology, Interventional , Computer Simulation , Humans , Monte Carlo Method , Phantoms, Imaging
2.
Phys Med ; 32(9): 1111-7, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27554367

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to provide some practical recommendations to reduce eye lens dose for workers exposed to X-rays in interventional cardiology and radiology and also to propose an eye lens correction factor when lead glasses are used. METHODS: Monte Carlo simulations are used to study the variation of eye lens exposure with operator position, height and body orientation with respect to the patient and the X-ray tube. The paper also looks into the efficiency of wraparound lead glasses using simulations. Computation results are compared with experimental measurements performed in Spanish hospitals using eye lens dosemeters as well as with data from available literature. RESULTS: Simulations showed that left eye exposure is generally higher than the right eye, when the operator stands on the right side of the patient. Operator height can induce a strong dose decrease by up to a factor of 2 for the left eye for 10-cm-taller operators. Body rotation of the operator away from the tube by 45°-60° reduces eye exposure by a factor of 2. The calculation-based correction factor of 0.3 for wraparound type lead glasses was found to agree reasonably well with experimental data. CONCLUSIONS: Simple precautions, such as the positioning of the image screen away from the X-ray source, lead to a significant reduction of the eye lens dose. Measurements and simulations performed in this work also show that a general eye lens correction factor of 0.5 can be used when lead glasses are worn regardless of operator position, height and body orientation.


Subject(s)
Cardiology/methods , Lens, Crystalline/radiation effects , Radiation Protection/methods , Radiology, Interventional/methods , Algorithms , Computer Simulation , Equipment Design , Humans , Lead , Monte Carlo Method , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Dosage , Radiometry/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Workforce , X-Rays
3.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 170(1-4): 21-6, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26163384

ABSTRACT

In the context of the decrease in the eye lens dose limit for occupational exposure to 20 mSv per year stated by the recent revision of the European Basic Safety Standards Directive 2013/59/EURATOM, the European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS) has organised in 2014, for the first time, an intercomparison exercise for eye lens dosemeters. The main objective was to assess the capabilities of the passive eye lens dosemeters currently in use in Europe for occupational monitoring in medical fields. A total of 20 European individual monitoring services from 15 different countries have participated. The dosemeters provided by the participants were all composed of thermoluminescent detectors, of various types and designs. The irradiations were carried out with several photon fields chosen to cover the energy and angle ranges encountered in medical workplace. Participants were asked to report the doses in terms of Hp(3) using their routine protocol. The results provided by each participant were compared with the reference delivered doses. All the results were anonymously analysed. Results are globally satisfactory since, among the 20 participants, 17 were able to provide 90 % of their response in accordance with the ISO 14146 standard requirements.


Subject(s)
Lens, Crystalline/radiation effects , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Dosimeters , Radiation Monitoring/instrumentation , Radiation Protection/methods , Calibration , Europe , European Union , Humans , Photons , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Radiation Protection/instrumentation
4.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 170(1-4): 45-8, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26464527

ABSTRACT

Recent studies highlight the fact that the new eye lens dose limit can be exceeded in interventional radiology procedures and that eye lens monitoring could be required for these workers. The recommended operational quantity for monitoring of eye lens exposure is the personal dose equivalent at 3 mm depth Hp(3) (ICRU 51). However, there are no available conversion coefficients in international standards, while in the literature coefficients have only been calculated for monoenergetic beams and for ISO 4037-1 X-ray qualities. The aim of this article is to provide air kerma to Hp(3) conversion coefficients for a cylindrical phantom made of ICRU-4 elements tissue-equivalent material for RQR radiation qualities (IEC-61267) from 40 to 120 kV and for angles of incidence from 0 to 180°, which are characteristic of medical workplace. Analytic calculations using interpolation techniques and Monte Carlo modelling have been compared.


Subject(s)
Lens, Crystalline/radiation effects , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Radiation Monitoring/standards , Radiation Protection/methods , Air , Algorithms , Calibration , Computer Simulation , Humans , Monte Carlo Method , Occupational Exposure , Phantoms, Imaging , Photons , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Dosimeters , Radiation Monitoring/instrumentation , Radiation Protection/instrumentation , X-Rays
5.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 165(1-4): 289-93, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25809107

ABSTRACT

The ICRP has recently recommended reducing the occupational exposure dose limit for the lens of the eye to 20 mSv y(-1), averaged over a period of 5 y, with no year exceeding 50 mSv, instead of the current 150 mSv y(-1). This reduction will have important implications for interventional cardiology and radiology (IC/IR) personnel. In this work, lens dose received by a staff working in IC is studied in order to determine whether eye lens dose monitoring or/and additional radiological protection measures are required. Eye lens dose exposure was monitored in 10 physicians and 6 nurses. The major IC procedures performed were coronary angiography and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. The personnel were provided with two thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLDs): one calibrated in terms of Hp(3) located close to the left ear of the operator and a whole-body dosemeter calibrated in terms of Hp(10) and Hp(0.07) positioned on the lead apron. The estimated annual eye lens dose for physicians ranged between 8 and 60 mSv, for a workload of 200 procedures y(-1). Lower doses were collected for nurses, with estimated annual Hp(3) between 2 and 4 mSv y(-1). It was observed that for nurses the Hp(0.07) measurement on the lead apron is a good estimate of eye lens dose. This is not the case for physicians, where the influence of both the position and use of protective devices such as the ceiling shield is very important and produces large differences among doses both at the eyes and on the thorax. For physicians, a good correlation between Hp(3) and dose area product is shown.


Subject(s)
Cardiology/methods , Lens, Crystalline/radiation effects , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Radiation Protection/methods , Radiology, Interventional/methods , Angioplasty/methods , Calibration , Coronary Angiography , Eye Protective Devices , Humans , Lead , Nurses , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Occupational Injuries/prevention & control , Physicians , Protective Clothing , Protective Devices , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Exposure/prevention & control , Radiometry , Risk
6.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 33(1): 60-2, 2004 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15140824

ABSTRACT

The authors present the case of a 17-year-old White male patient complaining of enlargement in the gingival region and the fundus of the left maxillary anterior vestibular sulcus. The clinicopathological diagnosis was plexiform unicystic ameloblastoma. With this report, the authors illustrate the importance and complexity of a differential diagnosis of lesions with a cystic aspect in the anterior region of the maxilla, among them inflammatory radicular cysts, odontogenic keratocysts, adenomatoid odontogenic and unicystic ameloblastoma.


Subject(s)
Ameloblastoma/diagnostic imaging , Maxillary Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Adolescent , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Male , Odontogenic Cysts/diagnostic imaging , Odontogenic Tumors/diagnostic imaging , Radicular Cyst/diagnostic imaging , Radiography
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...