The Isolated Chicken Eye test to replace the Draize test in rabbits.

In 1944, Draize et al., published a paper entitled "Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes". The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development published their first guideline on eye irritation in 1981, using rabbits. In the early eighties the development of alternative non-animal tests to replace the Draize eye test started. The first attempts to validate alternative tests for eye irritation were considered to be relatively simple by comparing in vitro and in vivo irritation index scores. In the early nineteen-eighties, we introduced the use of isolated eyes as an alternative test for the Draize eye irritation test. What was expected to be a process of several years, however, turned out to be a decades spanning process still not fully completed. For a large part, this can be attributed to the nature of the in vivo test in rabbits, which is more complicated and compromised than originally believed. This paper describes, most chronologically, the development, performance, validation and application of the Isolated Eye Test and, in broader perspective, the international validation and acceptance of this alternative test by regulatory authorities and agencies.

Evaluation of C-reactive protein as an inflammatory biomarker in rabbits for vaccine nonclinical safety studies.

INTRODUCTION: Inflammatory reactions are one of the potential safety concerns that are evaluated in the framework of vaccine safety testing. In nonclinical studies, the assessment of the inflammation relies notably on the measurement of biomarkers. C-reactive protein (CRP) is an acute-phase plasma protein of hepatic origin that could be used for that purpose in toxicity studies with rabbits. METHODS: To evaluate the utility of CRP as an additional inflammatory biomarker in adjuvant or vaccine toxicity studies, rabbits were injected on Day 0 with saline, aluminium phosphate, aluminium hydroxide, Adjuvant System (AS)01, AS03, AS15, or diphtheria-tetanus-whole cell pertussis-hepatitis B vaccine (DTPw-HB). Body weights, haematology parameters, CRP and fibrinogen levels were measured daily up to Day 7. Macroscopic changes at the injection site were also evaluated up to Day 7. At Day 7, a histopathological examination of the injection site was performed. RESULTS: Like fibrinogen, CRP levels rapidly increased after the injection of Adjuvant Systems or DTPw-HB, peaking at Day 1, and returning to baseline in less than a week. The magnitude of the CRP increase was consistently higher than that of fibrinogen with a larger fold increase from background, providing a more sensitive evaluation. The number of circulating heterophils was also increased on Day 1 after the injection of Adjuvant Systems or DTPw-HB. The highest increases in CRP levels were observed after the injection of DTPw-HB or AS03, and were also associated with the persistence of mixed inflammatory cell infiltrates (including heterophils) at the injection sites on Day 7. No increases in CRP levels and in circulating heterophils were observed after injection of the aluminium salt adjuvants. DISCUSSION: Our study supports the use of CRP as an accurate biomarker of acute inflammation in rabbits for vaccine toxicity studies and highlights an association between increased CRP levels and the recruitment of heterophils.

Histopathology in the isolated chicken eye test and comparison of different stainings of the cornea.

The isolated chicken eye (ICE) test, developed at our Institute, is accepted by the OECD for identification of severe eye irritants. The OECD ICE Guideline (No. 438) encourages preservation of the treated eyes for possible histopathology of the cornea, which is believed to strengthen evidence of absence or presence of irritation and to help clarify borderline effects by assessment of the corneal Depth-of-Injury. Histopathology of the cornea in addition to the normal slit-lamp microscope assessment of corneal effects has already been performed routinely in ICE tests at our Institute, using two standard stainings (H&E and PAS). In this study, three other stainings (AZAN, EVG and Trichrome), more specific for collagen-rich membranes such as basement- and Bowman's membranes were examined with corneas exposed to four model compounds ranging from non- to severely irritating (corrosive). PAS appeared to be the superior staining method. Surprisingly, the well-known eye corrosive sodium hydroxide (NaOH, solid) did not visibly compromise the integrity of Bowman's or the basement membrane. Based on our experience, histopathology of the treated cornea is confirmative in relation to the standard assessment of eye irritation by slit-lamp observation in the ICE and in certain cases can help to evaluate borderline effects. Besides establishing the depth of injury, additional investigation of corneal limbal stem cell damage after chemical exposure might be appropriate to determine reversibility or irreversibility of eye effects.