Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Front Allergy ; 3: 832010, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35386649

ABSTRACT

Background: Subcutaneous venom immunotherapy (VIT) represents an effective treatment against bee venom allergy. However, it involves long treatment times, high costs, and the risk of adverse events (AEs). Shorter, safer, and cheaper treatment options are therefore pursued. Objective: To determine the safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of bee venom intralymphatic immunotherapy (ILIT). Methods: In an open pilot study, 12 patients received bee venom ILIT in three sessions with 14-day intervals: 0.1-5 µg/dose. Ultrasound imaging was applied to guide an injection and to document the lymph node structure. In a second study, 67 patients from 15 centers in Europe and Australia were randomized to receive four doses of either 10- or 20-µg bee venom ILIT with 28-day intervals. Clinical endpoints included specific IgE and IgG and protection after a bee sting challenge. These studies were performed in the years 2000-2003. Results: In a proof-of-concept study, no serious AEs were observed. An increase in allergen-specific IgG1 but no IgG4 and IgE was observed. ILIT induced the protection against a bee sting challenge in 7 out of 8 challenged patients. In a multicenter study, an increase in allergen-specific IgG and IgE was observed, with the highest increase in patients receiving a higher ILIT dose. The study was terminated due to several serious AEs upon the sting challenge provocation after the completion of treatment. However, out of 45 patients challenged, 15 (65%) and 18 (82%) patients in the 10- and 20-µg group, respectively, showed an improvement of two grades or more. No correlation was observed between antibody levels and sting protection. Conclusions: While a pilot study suggested the safety and efficacy of bee venom ILIT, a high number of AEs seen after the sting challenge following a randomized study indicate that the immunology protection offered by bee venom ILIT is insufficient. Of note, the bee venom allergen extract used in the two studies were from the two different providers. While the first study used a formulation approved for use in subcutaneous VIT, the second study used a nonapproved formulation never tested in humans. Further studies on approved formulations should be performed to generate conclusive results regarding the safety and efficacy of bee venom ILIT.

2.
Arch Dermatol ; 141(3): 305-11, 2005 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15781671

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate long-term outcomes, impact of maintenance therapy and potential curability of patients with mycosis fungoides (MF) treated with psoralen plus UV-A (PUVA) monotherapy. DESIGN: Single-center retrospective cohort analysis. SETTING: Academic referral center for cutaneous lymphoma. PATIENTS: A total of 66 of 104 patients with clinical stages IA to IIA MF who achieved complete remission (CR) after PUVA monotherapy between 1979 and 1995. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Kaplan-Meier actuarial survival and disease-free survival curves were compared between stage IA and IB/IIA cases. Patients were stratified into relapse and nonrelapse groups based on whether their MF relapsed during study follow-up. Baseline characteristics and treatment were compared between these groups. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 94 months (range, 5-242 months). Thirty-three patients maintained CR for 84 months (range, 5-238 months), and 33 patients experienced relapse with a median disease-free interval of 39 months (range, 2-127 months). There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between patients in the nonrelapse and relapse groups. Those in the nonrelapse group received a higher cumulative dosage to CR (P = .03) and required longer treatment periods to achieve CR (P = .03). Disease-free survival rates at 5 and 10 years for all patients with stage IA were 56% and 30%, respectively, and for stage IB/IIA, 74% and 50%. Actuarial survival rates at 5, 10, and 15 years were 94%, 82%, and 82%, respectively, in patients with stage IA, and 80%, 69%, and 58% in patients with stage IB/IIA. The overall survival rate for the nonrelapse and relapse groups did not show any statistical difference. One third of the patients developed signs of chronic photodamage and secondary cutaneous malignancies. CONCLUSIONS: Psoralen UV-A is an effective treatment for MF, inducing long-term remissions and perhaps in some cases disease "cure." Thirty percent to 50% of patients remain disease free for 10 years, but late relapses occur. Long-term survival is not affected by relapse status, and the risk of photodamage needs to be measured against the possible benefit of greater disease elimination.


Subject(s)
Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous/drug therapy , Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous/pathology , PUVA Therapy/methods , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biopsy, Needle , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Skin Neoplasms/mortality , Survival Analysis , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
4.
Transplantation ; 77(1): 115-21, 2004 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14724445

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Transplant recipients (TR) have a dramatically increased risk for widespread epithelial neoplasms of the skin. Thus, there is a need to treat initial stages of these neoplasms such as actinic keratoses (AK) and Bowen's disease (BD) to prevent progression to invasive and potentially fatal squamous cell carcinoma. Topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been proven to be an effective treatment for AK and BD in immunocompetent patients, but no prospective trials in immunocompromised TR have been performed so far. METHODS: Twenty TR and 20 controls with histologically confirmed AK or BD underwent either a single or two consecutive treatments of topical PDT in an open trial. The application of 20% 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) for 5 hours was followed by illumination with 75 J/cm2 of visible light delivered at 80 mW/cm2 by an incoherent light source. RESULTS: The overall complete response rates in TR at 4, 12, and 48 weeks were 0.86, 0.68, and 0.48, respectively. The cure rates in both patient groups were comparable at 4 weeks but were significantly lower in TR than in controls at 12 and 48 weeks (P<0.05). Side effects included erythema, edema, and crust formation after illumination. Cosmetic results were excellent without scar formation or alterations in pigmentation. CONCLUSIONS: Topical PDT with 20% 5-ALA is an effective and safe treatment for AK and BD in immunosuppressed TR, with initial response rates comparable with those in immunocompetent patients. It is particularly useful in TR because of the possibility for repeated treatment of large lesional areas.


Subject(s)
Aminolevulinic Acid/administration & dosage , Bowen's Disease/drug therapy , Keratosis/drug therapy , Photochemotherapy , Photosensitivity Disorders/complications , Photosensitizing Agents/administration & dosage , Transplantation/adverse effects , Administration, Topical , Adult , Aged , Bowen's Disease/etiology , Bowen's Disease/pathology , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Keratosis/etiology , Keratosis/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Sunlight/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
5.
J Cutan Pathol ; 29(5): 279-81, 2002 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12100627

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: HHV-8 has been identified as the causative agent of Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) and some lymphoproliferative disorders. In addition, there are anecdotal reports on the presence of HHV-8 in other tumors, especially cutaneous epithelial and mesenchymal neoplasms. The aim of the study was to ascertain the value of identification of HHV-8 viral DNA sequences in routinely processed, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues for the diagnosis of Kaposi's sarcoma and other mesenchymal tumors. METHODS: The presence of HHV-8 sequences in archival material was studied by nested PCR using specific primers for amplification of a 233-bp long fragment of HHV-8 (ORF 26). RESULTS: Thirty-three patients with KS (18 classic/sporadic, six post-transplant and nine AIDS-related) and various mesenchymal tumors and related conditions (n = 76) were studied. HHV-8 DNA sequences were detected in 29 of the 33 cases of KS and in one case of multiple eruptive dermatofibroma (MEDF). CONCLUSIONS: Identification of HHV-8 DNA sequences in routinely processed tissue is a useful diagnostic marker for KS. Although other mesenchymal tumors are usually not associated with HHV-8, its presence is not fully specific for KS since HHV-8 sequences were also found in one case of MEDF. Therefore, PCR analysis for the detection of HHV-8 should only be used as an additional diagnostic marker for KS and in the context of other tools such as routine histology.


Subject(s)
DNA, Viral/analysis , Herpesviridae Infections/genetics , Herpesvirus 8, Human/genetics , Sarcoma, Kaposi/virology , Skin Neoplasms/virology , AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections/virology , Diagnosis, Differential , Herpesvirus 8, Human/isolation & purification , Humans , Mesenchymoma/virology , Polymerase Chain Reaction
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...