Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
In Vivo ; 33(3): 897-901, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31028214

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of the study was to determine the rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) cases in men submitted to early second round mpMRI/TRUS (multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound) fusion biopsy (TPBx). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2016 to December 2018, 256 men with a PI-RADS (Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System) score 3 (80 cases) or 4 (176 cases) and negative repeat transperineal saturation biopsy plus TPBx, underwent a new TPBx (four cores) for the persistent clinical suspicion of cancer. The accuracy of mpMRI ADC (apparent diffusion coefficient) values in the diagnosis of csPCa were evaluated. RESULTS: Overall detection rate of csPCa was equal to 10.1% (26/256 cases): 2.5% (2/80) versus 13.6% (24/176) had a PI-RADS score equal to 3 versus 4, respectively. The presence of csPCa was significantly correlated with an ADC value of 0.747×10-3 mm2/sec. CONCLUSION: A negative TBPx missed a csPCa in 13.6% of PI-RADS score 4 that was diagnosed by an early second round TBPx; the evaluation of ADC maps could select mpMRI lesions deserving a repeat TPBx.


Subject(s)
Image-Guided Biopsy , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Aged , Biomarkers, Tumor , Digital Rectal Examination , Early Detection of Cancer , Humans , Image-Guided Biopsy/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Prostatic Neoplasms/metabolism , ROC Curve
2.
J Urol ; 200(4): 774-778, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29679618

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to diagnose clinically significant prostate cancer and compared it with the diagnostic accuracy of transperineal saturation prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2011 to February 2018 repeat saturation prostate biopsy (the reference test) was done due to suspicion of cancer in 1,032 men with a median age of 63 years in whom median prostate specific antigen was 8.6 ng/ml. All patients underwent 3.0 Tesla pelvic multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging before saturation prostate biopsy. Additional targeted fusion prostate biopsy was done of lesions with a PI-RADS™ (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System) score of 3 or greater. RESULTS: T1c prostate cancer was found in 372 of the 1,032 patients (36%). Of these cases 272 (73.1%) were classified as clinically significant prostate cancer. Saturation prostate biopsy vs targeted fusion prostate biopsy and a PI-RADS score of 3 or greater vs targeted fusion prostate biopsy and a PI-RADS score of 4 or greater diagnosed 95.6% vs 83.8% vs 60.3% of clinically significant prostate cancers (p <0.0001). Saturation prostate biopsy missed 12 of 272 clinically significant prostate cancers (4.5%) vs 44 (16.2%) and 108 of 272 (39.7%) missed by targeted fusion prostate biopsy and a PI-RADS score of 3 or greater and a score of 4 or greater, respectively (p <0.0001). As a triage test multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging would have spared 49.3% vs 73.6% of patients using a PI-RADS cutoff of 3 or greater vs 4 or greater. CONCLUSIONS: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging could significantly reduce the number of unnecessary repeat prostate biopsies in about 50% of cases in which a PI-RADS score of 3 or greater is used. At the same time patients should be informed of the 16.2% and 39.7% false-negative rates of clinically significant prostate cancer for targeted fusion prostate biopsy of PI-RADS 3 or greater and 4 or greater lesions, respectively.


Subject(s)
Biopsy, Needle/methods , Image-Guided Biopsy/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Aged , Cohort Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Invasiveness/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity
3.
Anticancer Res ; 38(4): 2395-2398, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29599367

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of multiparametric magnetic imaging resonance (mpMRI) in men submitted to repeat saturation prostate biopsy (SPBx). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2011 to June 2017, 800 men underwent repeat SPBx; the cost-effectiveness of mpMRI if used as a 'triage test' to avoid unnecessary repeat prostate biopsy was retrospectively calculated using the Italian Public National Health System Day Service. RESULTS: SPBx vs. MRI fusion targeted biopsy diagnosed 215 (89.5%) vs. 184 (76.6%) out of 240, respectively. The overall cost of the 800 prostate biopsies was 138,221 €; the use of mpMRI as triage test would have spared 364/800 procedures, equivalent to 60,905 € (44% of the entire cost), whilst missing 15/205 (7.3%) cases of clinically significant cancer. CONCLUSION: mpMRI used as a triage test could reduce the need for prostate biopsies by about 45%, thereby improving cost-effectiveness, however, patients should be informed of the false-negative rate associated with mpMRI.


Subject(s)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging/economics , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Prostate/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Reoperation , Aged , Biopsy/economics , Biopsy/methods , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Image-Guided Biopsy/economics , Image-Guided Biopsy/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Prostatic Neoplasms/economics , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Reoperation/economics , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Sensitivity and Specificity
4.
Anticancer Res ; 37(6): 3291-3294, 2017 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28551679

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: To evaluate the detection rate for clinically-significant prostate cancer (PCa) of transperineal (TP) vs. transrectal (TR) multiparametric MRI/TRUS (magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound) fusion targeted-biopsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2016 to December 2016, 150 men underwent repeat saturation transperineal prostate biopsy (SPBx; median 30 cores) combined with targeted mpMRI/TRUS TR and TP fusion biopsies (4 cores for each procedure) of suspicious MRI lesions (PI-RADS 3/5). RESULTS: Overall, in 55/150 (36.6%) men a clinically-significant PCa was found and in 49 (89.1%) of them mpMRI was positive. SPBx, mpMRI/TRUS TR and TP fusion targeted-biopsy diagnosed 52 (94.5%), 43 (78.1%) and 49 (89.1%) PCa, respectively; TR fusion biopsy missed 8 (53.3%) while TP missed 2 (13.3%) cancers of the anterior zone. CONCLUSION: Multiparametric MRI/TRUS TP in comparison to TR fusion biopsy detected a greater percentage of small but clinically significant PCa of the anterior zone (86.7% vs. 46.7%; p=0.0001).


Subject(s)
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Endosonography , Image-Guided Biopsy/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Aged , Biopsy, Large-Core Needle , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Predictive Value of Tests , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Tumor Burden
5.
Semin Ultrasound CT MR ; 33(5): 396-409, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22964406

ABSTRACT

High-resolution multidetector computed tomography with multiplanar reformations and 3-D postprocessing often provides the detail necessary for preoperative assessment of facial injuries. Maxillofacial fractures are classified in the following manner: upper face fractures, midface fractures (the most frequent), Le Fort fractures, and lower face or mandible fractures. The facial skeleton is a framework of vertical and horizontal buttresses that ensures a better resistance to trauma, but serves also as reference for maxillofacial surgery to restore facial size and shape. Radiologists should know how to diagnose and report the main types of facial fracture.


Subject(s)
Facial Bones/diagnostic imaging , Facial Bones/injuries , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods , Skull Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Humans
6.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech ; 20(3): e105-9, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20551788

ABSTRACT

Differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and other hypervascular liver lesions, such as hepatocellular adenoma (HCA), is important because of the drastically different therapeutic approach. However, FNH can be well distinguished only if it shows a typical aspect; alternatively, in the case of atypical FNH, imaging findings are not specific enough to provide a secure diagnosis and histologic verification of the lesion is required. In addition, HCA cannot be identified conclusively by any current available imaging technique and it can be at best suspected strongly, and this suspicion may lead to liver resection. Herein we report a case of a patient with an unusual FNH nodule presenting at ultrasonographic scanning as an isoechoic mass arising from hepatic segment 4b; the diagnostic indecision between FNH and HCA was not definitively solved even after computed tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging and the patient was scheduled for a laparoscopic resection. The pathologic examination diagnosed an atypical FNH nodule. The clinical doubt between FNH and HCA remains a problem affecting the clinicians, and more effort should be made in the direction of a better preoperative differentiation of such different conditions. Surgical resection should not be considered as the failure of the preoperative diagnostic attempt, but as the mainstay for a definitive and sure diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Adenoma, Liver Cell/diagnosis , Focal Nodular Hyperplasia/diagnosis , Laparoscopy , Liver Neoplasms/diagnosis , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Adenoma, Liver Cell/surgery , Diagnosis, Differential , Diagnostic Imaging , Female , Focal Nodular Hyperplasia/surgery , Hepatectomy , Humans , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...